Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
90 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Earlier Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-6
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Below is a in depth comparison of the Kodak C135 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS, both Waterproof cameras by companies Kodak and Ricoh. The image resolution of the C135 (14MP) and the WG-5 GPS (16MP) is very comparable and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe C135 was manufactured 4 years before the WG-5 GPS and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the C135 scores vs the WG-5 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare C135 & Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The entire galleries are provided at Kodak C135 Gallery & Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| C135 | WG-5 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Kodak C135
| WG-5 GPS | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2015 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 37 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.6") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 112k | Sharper display (+348k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C135 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| C135 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Kodak C135 enjoys physical measurements of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has sizing of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
See the Kodak C135 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the C135 versus the WG-5 GPS.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the C135 and WG-5 GPS is 92 and 90 respectively.
Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements purely by going through specs. The visual underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the C135 and WG-5 GPS.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to produce extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images much more aggressively. The older C135 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C135 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare C135 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2015-02-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1250 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35mm (1x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.4 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 112 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 14.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175g (0.39 pounds) | 236g (0.52 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $0 | $500 |