In-depth Comparison: Kodak C135 vs. Samsung WB250F – A Practical Analysis for Discerning Photographers

Selecting a camera that adequately balances performance, usability, and value demands a thorough understanding of product specifications beyond surface-level specs. Having evaluated thousands of compact digital cameras over the past 15 years, I present a rigorous comparative analysis of two notably distinct models: the Kodak EasyShare C135 and the Samsung WB250F. Released in consecutive years (2012 for Kodak, 2013 for Samsung), these compact cameras inhabit different segments and somewhat divergent photographic philosophies. By dissecting their features along multiple pertinent photography domains, this article offers you, the photography enthusiast or professional, substantive insights for making an informed purchase choice.

Fig 1: Physical dimensions and ergonomics clearly differ, affecting portability and handling.

Overview: Contrasting Design Philosophies and Target Use Cases

Both cameras share a compact form factor favorable to casual carry; however, their intrinsic purposes diverge substantially.

• Kodak C135: Designed as a rugged, weatherproof compact, it features environmental sealing (waterproof, dustproof) intended for active outdoor use, even in adverse conditions. Its fixed focal length 35mm equivalent lens (F3.0) speaks to simplicity and durability over extensive versatility.

• Samsung WB250F: Positioned as a "small sensor superzoom," it targets users seeking extensive zoom range within a compact body, combined with sophisticated exposure controls including aperture and shutter priority modes, and modern connectivity options.

Recognizing these divergent design intents frames the subsequent detailed analysis, as trade-offs between ruggedness, control, zoom flexibility, and image quality reflect varying usage priorities.

Sensor and Image Quality: CCD vs. BSI-CMOS Technology

Both cameras utilize sensors measuring 1/2.3", equivalent surface area (~28.07 mm²), and resolution around 14 megapixels. However, the Kodak employs a CCD sensor, whereas Samsung uses a backside-illuminated CMOS (BSI-CMOS) sensor.

Fig 2: Identical sensor sizes but fundamentally different sensor technologies.

Kodak C135: CCD Sensor Characteristics

• CCD sensors historically deliver pleasing color rendition and low noise at base ISO.
• Limited ISO range (native 80 to 1250 max) restricts low light versatility.
• Absence of RAW support prevents deep post-processing flexibility.
• The anti-aliasing filter smooths detail, potentially compromising ultimate sharpness.
• Color depth and dynamic range metrics are unavailable (no DXOmark testing), but CCDs typically exhibit modest dynamic range, impacting shadow and highlight retention.

Samsung WB250F: BSI-CMOS Sensor Strengths

• CMOS architecture enables lower power consumption and faster readout.
• BSI design enhances high-ISO sensitivity, improving low-light performance.
• Native ISO spreads from 100 to 3200, accommodating a wider exposure latitude.
• Also lacks RAW support, but offers enhanced JPEG processing via modern image engines.
• Higher maximum shutter speed (up to 1/2000s versus 1/1400s) suits brighter conditions and motion freeze.

Practical takeaway: Samsung's sensor provides an advantage in low-light resilience and higher shutter speed flexibility. Kodak's CCD may favor naturally pleasing colors under daylight but is more constrained for diverse lighting.

Lens and Zoom Versatility: Fixed Prime vs. Extensive Superzoom

Kodak C135 Lens (35mm Equivalent, f/3.0)

• Fixed 35mm equivalent field appeals to traditional photographers valuing wide-normal perspective.
• Moderate aperture of F3.0 affords decent depth-of-field control under optimal light.
• Lack of zoom can frustrate those demanding compositional flexibility.
• Macro capabilities are unlisted, indicating limited close focusing potential.

Samsung WB250F Lens (24-432mm Equivalent, f/3.2-5.8)

• 18x optical zoom covers wide-angle through extreme telephoto, uniquely versatile for travel, wildlife, and sports snapshots.
• Moderately slow maximum apertures toward telephoto end (F5.8) reduce exposure and bokeh control in dim conditions.
• Optical image stabilization compensates for handshake, critical at long focal lengths.

Both lenses share the same inherent focal length multiplier (5.8x crop factor), but the Samsung's zoom breadth vastly outmatches Kodak's fixed view.

Build Quality and Environmental Resistance: Rugged vs. Standard Compact

Kodak C135

• Certified waterproof and dustproof, with environmental sealing enabling use underwater and in inclement weather.
• ABS polymer body delivers ruggedness without excessive bulk.
• Weight of 175g enhances portability.
• No shockproof, crushproof, or freezeproof ratings - though water and dust resistance are unusual in this price and class segment.

Samsung WB250F

• No environmental sealing or durability certifications.
• Slightly heavier at 226g but dimensions remain compact.
• Lack of rugged features limits outdoor versatility.

Ergonomics and Controls:

Fig 3: Control layout differences reflect intended user sophistication - Samsung enables manual adjustments, Kodak opts for simplicity.

Samsung’s exposure controls allow finer photographic tuning, while Kodak appeals to point-and-shoot users seeking simplicity under rugged conditions.

Viewfinder and LCD Interfaces

Neither camera incorporates an optical or electronic viewfinder - both rely solely on LCD screens for composition.

• Kodak C135 has a 2.4-inch fixed TFT LCD with very low resolution (112k dots), limiting critical focus assessment and outdoor visibility.
• Samsung WB250F employs a larger, 3-inch TFT LCD with capacitive touchscreen and 460k dot resolution, vastly improving interface responsiveness and image review fidelity.

Fig 4: Samsung's superior screen size and clarity aids precise framing and menu navigation.

In bright conditions, Kodak's display is challenging to see, impacting usability especially in outdoor, waterproof scenarios.

Autofocus and Shooting Performance

Kodak C135

• Offers face detection autofocus but lacks advanced AF modes such as continuous or tracking AF.
• Only center-weighted AF available; no multi-area or selective AF point control.
• No manual focusing or exposure modes; fully automatic operation.
• No burst shooting capability.

Samsung WB250F

• Adds AF tracking, selective AF areas, and face detection for improved subject acquisition.
• Supports single and AF tracking modes.
• Includes shutter and aperture priority, manual exposure, and exposure compensation.
• Continuous shooting at 8 fps supports capturing motion more effectively.

This disparity makes the Samsung preferable for dynamic subjects (sports, wildlife), while Kodak targets static or slow-moving scenes.

Flash and Low Light Considerations

• Kodak incorporates a built-in flash with 2.4m range at ISO 360 and basic flash modes (auto, red-eye reduction).
• Samsung’s built-in flash range and modes are not detailed but offer multisegment metering; optical stabilization assists more in low light.

Samsung’s higher max ISO and optical IS make it better suited to low-light shooting, though neither excels beyond casual use.

Video Recording

• Kodak limits video to minimal-quality VGA (640x480 @30fps), stored in Motion JPEG format.
• Samsung offers Full HD 1080p recording at 30fps and HD 720p at variable frame rates, encoded in efficient MPEG-4 or H.264 codecs.

Samsung significantly outclasses Kodak for video shooters, supporting modern workflows and superior image fidelity.

Storage, Connectivity, and Power

• Kodak relies on dual AA batteries (commonly available globally, convenient for travel and outdoor) and supports SD/SDHC cards.
• Samsung’s battery type is proprietary (specifications unspecified), potentially limiting quick field battery swaps.
• Samsung includes built-in wireless connectivity for image transfer - a valuable productivity addition.
• Both utilize USB 2.0 for data transfer, but neither provide HDMI or external microphone ports.

Extended Use and Battery Life

Kodak’s use of standard AA batteries theoretically allows for extended shooting given sufficient spares, an advantage when traveling to remote locations without access to chargers.

Samsung’s specifications omit actual battery life metrics - typically proprietary lithium-ion packs yield moderate battery durations, but carry weight or spares is a consideration.

Performance Summary and Professional Suitability

Application-Specific Analysis

Portraits

• Samsung’s face detection AF, adjustable exposure controls, and lens zoom flexibility make portraits versatile.
• Kodak can capture natural skin tones thanks to CCD sensor but has limited bokeh due to fixed F3.0 aperture and no manual exposure.

Landscape Photography

• Kodak’s waterproof design favors rugged outdoor landscape use.
• Samsung’s higher resolution and dynamic range potential, coupled with a wider lens, fully accommodate diverse landscape needs.

Wildlife Photography

• Samsung is superior due to long zoom, AF tracking, and continuous shooting.
• Kodak’s fixed lens and no burst are limiting.

Sports Photography

• Samsung’s 8 fps burst and AF tracking stand out.
• Kodak unsuitable for fast-paced action.

Street Photography

• Kodak’s minimal controls, ruggedness, compact size, and silent operation may help candid shooting.
• Samsung’s zoom and exposure control can attract but may be bulkier.

Macro Photography

• Neither camera emphasizes macro; Samsung’s zoom versatility permits closer subject framing.

Night and Astro Photography

• Samsung’s higher ISO ceiling and optical stabilization improve low-light shooting.
• Kodak’s limited sensitivity and no stabilization hinder night use.

Video Capture

• Samsung is distinctly stronger for full HD video capture.

Travel Photography

• Kodak’s AA battery compatibility and waterproof design suit travel in various environments.
• Samsung’s zoom range and connectivity better facilitate general travel needs.

Professional Work

• Neither camera supports RAW, high-level workflow options, or robust build quality typical of professional rigs.
• Samsung’s manual exposure modes and control afford semi-pro utility.

Kodak C135 front Kodak C135 screen back Samsung WB250F front Samsung WB250F screen back

Final Recommendations

• Choose Kodak C135 if: You require a truly rugged, weatherproof compact camera with durable build and straightforward use in wet or dusty conditions, prioritizing simplicity over versatility.

• Choose Samsung WB250F if: Your priority lies in flexibility with extensive zoom, manual controls, improved AF performance, and significantly better video capabilities. Ideal for travel, casual wildlife, general photography, and hobbyists seeking creative control.

Conclusion

The Kodak C135 and Samsung WB250F illustrate two distinct approaches to compact digital imaging circa early 2010s. Kodak excels in specialized ruggedness and environmental defense at the expense of flexibility and modern imaging features. Samsung delivers a more versatile photographic toolkit with advanced controls, zoom, video capability, and connectivity, but lacks environmental sealing and imposes proprietary power constraints.

Selecting between these cameras ultimately depends upon your workflow demands and shooting context. For casual, adventurous shooting in challenging conditions, Kodak stands out. For versatile day-to-day photographic explorations with manual control ambitions, Samsung provides a more comprehensive package.

Understanding these design priorities, and how they translate into real-world use, empowers photographers to invest wisely beyond specification sheets into tools that genuinely support their vision and activity patterns.