Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST700
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
99 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 99 x 55 x 20mm
- Launched January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST700 Overview
Following is a detailed review of the Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST700, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Kodak and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and ST700 (16MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and ST700 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe M320 was released 24 months earlier than the ST700 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the M320 matches up versus the ST700 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST700 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare M320 & Samsung ST700. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak M320 Gallery & Samsung ST700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Samsung ST700
| M320 | ST700 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung ST700 over the Kodak M320
| ST700 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 24 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Samsung ST700
| M320 | ST700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST700 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Kodak M320 has outside dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung ST700 has dimensions of 99mm x 55mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST700 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the M320 vs the ST700.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M320 and ST700 is 95 and 99 respectively.
Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST700 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes simply by researching specs. The pic below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and ST700.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The M320 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Samsung ST700 will provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged M320 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST700 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST700 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M320 | Samsung ST700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Samsung ST700 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2011-01-05 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 80 | - |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | () |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) | - |
| Dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 99 x 55 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | KLIC-7001 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $39 | $280 |
