Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Sony T99

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 front
Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
27
Overall
33

Kodak M320 vs Sony T99 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Launched January 2009
Sony T99
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
  • 121g - 93 x 56 x 17mm
  • Launched July 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak M320 vs Sony T99 Overview

On this page, we are analyzing the Kodak M320 versus Sony T99, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Sony. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and T99 (14MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and T99 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The M320 was manufactured 18 months before the T99 making them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick view of how the M320 grades against the T99 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Sony T99

 M320 T99 

Reasons to pick Sony T99 over the Kodak M320

 T99 M320 
LaunchedJuly 2010January 2009Fresher by 18 months
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Sony T99

 M320 T99 
Focus manually No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Kodak M320 vs Sony T99 Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Kodak M320 provides exterior measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony T99 has sizing of 93mm x 56mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).

Take a look at the Kodak M320 versus Sony T99 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the M320 versus the T99.

Kodak M320 vs Sony T99 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the M320 and T99 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Sony T99 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony T99 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very hard to see the contrast in sensor sizing purely by going through specs. The visual below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the M320 and T99.

As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The M320 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Sony T99 will provide more detail due to its extra 5MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older M320 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Kodak M320 vs Sony T99 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony T99 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Sony T99 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony T99 as a Portrait photography camera
19
no manual focus
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
low resolution (9MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
does not have RAW files
28
megapixel count decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Street photography camera
Sony T99 as a Street photography camera
47
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
does not have RAW files
heavier than others (155 grams)
57
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography info
Sony T99 Sports photography info
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low resolution (9MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
does not have phase detect AF
35
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
max shutter speed is low (1/1,250 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Travel photography camera
Sony T99 as a Travel photography camera
50
built-in flash
no Time Lapse function
heavier than others (155g)
low resolution (9 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
65
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (25mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography info
Sony T99 Landscape photography info
22
no manual focus
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7")
lack of manual mode
no image stabilization
low resolution (9MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
does not have RAW files
no Time Lapse function
42
rather wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
missing Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Vlogging camera
Sony T99 as a Vlogging camera
22
wide angle not good (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
no external mic jack
heavier than others (155g)
31
rather wide (25mm)
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Optical)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external mic port
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Kodak M320 vs Sony T99 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Sony T99
 Kodak EasyShare M320Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99
General Information
Brand Kodak Sony
Model Kodak EasyShare M320 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Launched 2009-01-08 2010-07-08
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3472 x 2604 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 25 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 34-102mm (3.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/3.5-4.6
Macro focus distance 10cm 1cm
Crop factor 6.3 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 2 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/1250 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m 4.60 m
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red eye, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155g (0.34 pounds) 121g (0.27 pounds)
Physical dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 93 x 56 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7001 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1, portrait2)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $39 $179