Comparing the Kodak EasyShare M340 vs M380: A Hands-On Guide for Photography Enthusiasts

Choosing the right compact camera can be a daunting task, especially with multiple models from the same brand offering overlapping features. Today, we take a detailed look at two ultracompact Kodak EasyShare models - the M340 and the M380 - both launched in early 2009. These cameras target casual shooters and photography enthusiasts looking for compact portability with decent zoom capabilities.

Drawing from extensive hands-on testing and technical analysis, we will break down the key differences and practical performance of these cameras across various photography styles and use cases. Whether you are a beginner looking for an easy point-and-shoot or a walker-photographer seeking a lightweight travel companion, this thorough comparison will help you find which Kodak fits your creative needs best.

How Do They Stack Up in Size and Ergonomics?

At first glance, both cameras embody the classic ultracompact style, designed to slip into your pocket for casual use or quick snapshots.

The M340 is marginally smaller and lighter, making it even more pocket-friendly. Its reduced weight benefits street photographers and travelers who prioritize minimal bulk. However, the M380, with its slightly larger size, offers a more substantial grip that some users might find steadier during longer shoots.

Neither model has a pronounced handgrip, and both rely on smooth, rounded edges, which can feel a little slippery without a wrist strap. For extended handheld shooting, you might appreciate the M380’s more solid feel.

The Control Layout and Top Panel Design: Simplicity Meets Usability

Simplicity is key with these easy-to-use cameras. Both have minimal controls and no advanced manual settings.

• The M340 sticks to an ultra-simplified layout, with a mode dial limited to auto and program shooting modes.
• The M380 introduces a few extra control points given its added zoom range, including a zoom rocker with smoother action and a dedicated playback button.

Neither camera sports a top LCD panel or advanced dials, which aligns with their beginner-friendly intentions. If you enjoy a straightforward interface designed for point-and-shoot style photography, both models perform well.

Sensor Technology: Modest But Serviceable for Everyday Photos

Both models employ a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor sized 6.17 x 4.55 mm with roughly a 28 mm² sensor area - standard fare for ultracompact cameras of the era.

In practical terms, the image quality from both cameras is similar and straightforward. The CCD sensor delivers respectable color fidelity and decent noise control at lower ISO settings, but both quickly show noise and softening past ISO 400. Neither supports RAW format, limiting post-processing flexibility.

Testing confirms that while the M340 and M380 are capable of producing pleasant prints and screen shares, they do not compete with larger-sensor cameras or even many modern smartphones in low light or detail-heavy scenarios.

Viewing and Composing: LCD Screen Showdown

Neither camera has an electronic viewfinder, so composition relies entirely on the rear LCD screen.

The M380 somewhat edges out the M340 by offering a larger 3-inch screen, which can aid in easier framing and review. However, the resolution is the same on both, delivering decent clarity but limiting usability in bright sunlight.

Neither supports touchscreen capabilities, meaning navigation through menus or focus point selection is button-based, which can feel archaic but is typical for entry-level models.

Lens and Zoom: Optical Versatility Differences

Here lies the most striking difference between these two Kodak EasyShare cameras.

The M340 offers a moderate zoom of 35 to 105 mm (equivalent focal length), suitable for wide-angle landscapes and short telephoto portrait shots. The M380 extends zoom significantly to 190 mm, making it better for distant subjects such as wildlife or casual sports photography.

The slightly wider aperture in telephoto on the M380 (f/5.6 vs. f/5.7) is negligible but its zoom increase is significant. Still, neither camera employs image stabilization, which makes longer zoom shots more prone to blur unless using a tripod or very steady hands.

Autofocus Systems: Precision vs. Speed

Autofocus is a crucial consideration, especially for subjects that move or when shooting in dynamic scenarios.

Here the M380 gains another advantage. It features an expanded array of 25 focus points versus just 5 on the M340. Moreover, the M380 supports continuous autofocus, which helps keep moving subjects in focus - important for wildlife or sports shooting.

The M340’s AF is limited to single-shot mode, adequate for static scenes but less reliable when your subject moves unpredictably.

Shooting Features and Speed

Both cameras focus on ease of use with limited manual controls.

Note the M340’s maximum shutter speed advantage goes higher (up to 1/4000 sec) compared to the M380’s 1/1448. This faster shutter can aid in bright light and motion freezing but is marginal because both cameras mainly rely on auto exposure with no manual override.

The M380 supports continuous autofocus during video and shoots 30fps video at 640x480, while the M340 sometimes drops to 15 fps depending on settings.

Flash and Low-Light Capabilities

The M340 provides a stronger flash output, suitable for filling subjects at a greater distance. However, image noise and performance at ISO 1600 are generally soft and grainy for both.

Neither camera has dedicated image stabilization or strong noise reduction, so shooting indoors with flash or low light in auto mode will produce typical compact-camera results: usable but not professional grade.

Build, Durability, and Environmental Resistance

Both models target casual use and do not offer weather sealing, waterproofing, or ruggedized builds.

• Materials: Predominantly lightweight plastic bodies.
• Sealing: No dust, water, or shock resistance.
• Reliability: Suitable for everyday carry but handle with care.

If your photography adventures often involve harsh weather or rough handling, neither camera is well-suited out of the box. Protective cases would be essential.

Battery Life and Storage

• Battery Types: M340 uses the Kodak KLIC-7001; M380 uses Kodak KLIC-7003 batteries.
• Battery Life: Both cameras have similar ratings, delivering approximately 150–200 shots per charge.
• Storage: Single SD/SDHC card slot with internal memory.
• Connectivity: USB 2.0 only; no wireless, Bluetooth, NFC, GPS, or HDMI.

The lack of wireless features means you must physically connect to transfer your images, which is less convenient compared to modern cameras. For casual photographers, this may be acceptable.

Sample Images and Real-World Usage

Let's examine some sample photos from each camera across different conditions.

Kodak M340 front Kodak M340 screen back Kodak M380 front Kodak M380 screen back

• Portraits: Both cameras render skin tones pleasantly under daylight. The M380’s longer zoom gives more creative framing possibilities.
• Landscape: Wide angle capability on the M340 (35 mm equiv.) works well for sweeping scenes. The M380’s limitation to 38 mm on the wide end offers a slightly narrower view.
• Macro and Close-up: The M340’s closer macro focusing distance (7 cm) enables better close-up shots compared to 10 cm on M380.
• Low Light: Both show significant noise beyond ISO 400. Use flash cautiously.
• Video: Both limited to VGA resolution. Suitable for casual, low-res family videos only.

Performance Ratings and Summary

How They Perform Across Photography Disciplines

• Portrait Photography: M340’s wider aperture and macro closeness aid portraits; M380 offers more zoom for distant portraits but less flattering macro.
• Landscape: M340’s wider lens supports more expansive landscapes; the M380’s zoom is less useful here.
• Wildlife & Sports: M380 excels with 5x zoom and continuous AF, better tracking action.
• Street: M340’s lighter build makes it easier to carry; both quiet but lack fast autofocus and stealthy design.
• Macro: M340 is better with closer focusing distance.
• Night/Astro: Neither suitable for night sky or astrophotography due to sensor limits.
• Video: Poor resolutions and no stabilization limit video use.
• Travel: Both portable; M340 better for minimalists, M380 for zoom versatility.
• Professional Work: Neither supports RAW or advanced controls; limited as a backup.

Who Should Buy the Kodak M340 or M380?

Understanding your photographic needs is essential in selecting between these two.

Kodak EasyShare M340 - Best For:

• Casual photographers needing a simple, ultra-compact camera.
• Those prioritizing portability with a lightweight body.
• Users focusing on portraits, close-up macros, or landscapes requiring wide-angle.
• Beginners wanting an inexpensive entry into digital point-and-shoot cameras.
• Travelers valuing pocketability and ease.

Kodak EasyShare M380 - Best For:

• Enthusiasts who need more zoom reach for wildlife, sports, or travel.
• Users appreciating continuous autofocus and faster AF point coverage.
• Photographers who want a slightly bigger screen for easier composing.
• Those willing to trade some compactness for additional versatility.
• Casual videographers requiring decent frame rates at VGA resolution.

Final Thoughts and Recommendations

Despite being released contemporaneously, the Kodak M340 and M380 target subtly different user preferences. The M340 delivers simplicity, portability, and easy handling, making it ideal for users wanting fuss-free snapshots and good close-focus ability. The M380 adds zoom versatility and autofocus improvements but at the cost of added weight and less wide-angle coverage.

Neither camera is suited for professional-level use due to limited manual controls, lack of RAW, and poor low-light performance. Yet, as basic point-and-shoot companions, both offer a reliable Kodak image style with accessible controls.

If you crave greater reach and slightly enhanced autofocus, the M380 is your pick. If you value size, lightness, and macro capabilities, go with the M340. For those on a tight budget, the M340 often sells cheaper and delivers essential features without compromise.

Tips to Get the Most Out of Your Kodak Compact

• Use a tripod or stable surface to improve image sharpness without image stabilization.
• Take advantage of the macro focus abilities for creative close-ups.
• Shoot in good light to minimize ISO noise.
• Explore manual editing software to polish JPEGs as RAW is unavailable.
• Invest in extra batteries and SD cards for travel or extended shoots.
• Pair with a compact carrying case for added protection.

Wrapping It Up - Helping You Choose Wisely

Both the Kodak EasyShare M340 and M380 continue to represent accessible points into digital photography from the late 2000s era. They serve well as beginner cameras or secondary devices for nostalgic Kodak fans.

Our extensive analysis and hands-on tests underscore their practical uses and limits - information you won't always find in spec sheets alone. When you understand these cameras’ strengths and drawbacks, you can select one that truly fits your creative journey.

Don't forget: the best camera is the one you have with you and enjoy using. Check out these Kodak models in person, try their zoom and controls, and see which feels better in your hands before deciding.

Happy photographing!

This article integrates real-world testing data, sensor and lens analysis, and genre-specific performance to help you make an informed Kodak EasyShare M340 vs M380 decision. For more detailed camera reviews like this, keep exploring our expert content.