Clicky

Kodak M340 vs Sony W560

Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
11
Overall
24
Kodak EasyShare M340 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W560 front
Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
28
Overall
33

Kodak M340 vs Sony W560 Key Specs

Kodak M340
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
  • 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
  • Released January 2009
Sony W560
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-104mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 110g - 94 x 56 x 19mm
  • Revealed January 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak M340 vs Sony W560 Overview

Following is a complete analysis of the Kodak M340 versus Sony W560, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Kodak and Sony. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the M340 (10MP) and W560 (14MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The M340 was introduced 24 months prior to the W560 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short summary of how the M340 grades vs the W560 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Sony W560

 M340 W560 

Reasons to pick Sony W560 over the Kodak M340

 W560 M340 
RevealedJanuary 2011January 2009More modern by 24 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Common features in the Kodak M340 and Sony W560

 M340 W560 
Focus manually No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Kodak M340 vs Sony W560 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Kodak M340 has got external dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs) whilst the Sony W560 has sizing of 94mm x 56mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).

Look at the Kodak M340 versus Sony W560 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the M340 compared to the W560.

Kodak M340 vs Sony W560 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M340 and W560 is 96 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M340 vs Sony W560 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M340 vs Sony W560 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reading technical specs. The picture underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the M340 and W560.

As you can tell, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should expect the Sony W560 to offer greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged M340 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Kodak M340 vs Sony W560 sensor size comparison

Kodak M340 vs Sony W560 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M340 vs Sony W560 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M340 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony W560 as a Portrait photography camera
19
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
28
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Kodak M340 Street photography features
Sony W560 Street photography features
47
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
57
image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Kodak M340 as a Sports photography camera
Sony W560 as a Sports photography camera
16
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
35
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Kodak M340 Travel photography factors
Sony W560 Travel photography factors
51
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse recording
low MP (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
65
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (26mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.7)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak M340
Landscape photography with Sony W560
22
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
small screen (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse recording
42
pretty wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
manual focus not available
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.7)
no manual control
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M340 Vlogging factors
Sony W560 Vlogging factors
22
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have microphone port
29
pretty wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish max aperture (f2.7)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing mic jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak M340 vs Sony W560 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M340 and Sony W560
 Kodak EasyShare M340Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W560
General Information
Brand Kodak Sony
Model type Kodak EasyShare M340 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W560
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2009-01-05 2011-01-06
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - BIONZ
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3664 x 2748 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 64 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 5 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35-105mm (3.0x) 26-104mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.1-5.7 f/2.7-5.7
Macro focusing distance 7cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology - Clear Photo LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 2 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.50 m 3.80 m
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 115 gr (0.25 lbs) 110 gr (0.24 lbs)
Dimensions 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") 94 x 56 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID KLIC-7001 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $130 $139