Clicky

Kodak M381 vs Nikon S220

Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
13
Overall
26
Kodak EasyShare M381 front
 
Nikon Coolpix S220 front
Portability
97
Imaging
33
Features
11
Overall
24

Kodak M381 vs Nikon S220 Key Specs

Kodak M381
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-175mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
  • 153g - 101 x 60 x 20mm
  • Released July 2009
Nikon S220
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 2000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 100g - 90 x 56 x 18mm
  • Released February 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak M381 vs Nikon S220 Overview

Below is a detailed analysis of the Kodak M381 versus Nikon S220, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Kodak and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the M381 (12MP) and the S220 (10MP) is pretty similar and they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The M381 was unveiled 6 months later than the S220 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the M381 scores versus the S220 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M381 over the Nikon S220

 M381 S220 
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")

Reasons to pick Nikon S220 over the Kodak M381

 S220 M381 

Common features in the Kodak M381 and Nikon S220

 M381 S220 
ReleasedJuly 2009February 2009Similar generation
Manually focus No manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kSame screen resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Kodak M381 vs Nikon S220 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Kodak M381 provides outside measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 153 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Nikon S220 has sizing of 90mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs).

Check out the Kodak M381 versus Nikon S220 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the M381 and the S220.

Kodak M381 vs Nikon S220 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M381 and S220 is 95 and 97 respectively.

Kodak M381 vs Nikon S220 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M381 vs Nikon S220 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be hard to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reviewing technical specs. The graphic underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the M381 and S220.

As you can tell, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You should expect the Kodak M381 to offer you extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a little more aggressively.

Kodak M381 vs Nikon S220 sensor size comparison

Kodak M381 vs Nikon S220 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M381 vs Nikon S220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M381 Portrait photography features
Nikon S220 Portrait photography features
21
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
19
no manual focus
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Kodak M381 as a Street photography camera
Nikon S220 as a Street photography camera
47
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
heavier than others in class (153 grams)
48
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Kodak M381 Sports photography factors
Nikon S220 Sports photography factors
17
low max shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
16
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Kodak M381 Travel photography advice
Nikon S220 Travel photography advice
50
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse recording
heavier than others in class (153g)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
52
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse mode
MP count low (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M381 as a Landscape photography camera
Nikon S220 as a Landscape photography camera
28
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
manual focus not available
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual exposure
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
does not have Time Lapse recording
22
no manual focus
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
small screen (2.5")
no manual exposure
no image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
missing Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M381 Vlogging factors
Nikon S220 Vlogging factors
22
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have mic socket
heavier than others in class (153g)
22
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
missing mic support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak M381 vs Nikon S220 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M381 and Nikon S220
 Kodak EasyShare M381Nikon Coolpix S220
General Information
Make Kodak Nikon
Model type Kodak EasyShare M381 Nikon Coolpix S220
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2009-07-29 2009-02-03
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 1600 2000
Min native ISO 64 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35-175mm (5.0x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Max aperture f/3.0-4.8 f/3.1-5.9
Macro focusing distance 10cm 10cm
Crop factor 5.9 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 2.5"
Screen resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8s 8s
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate - 11.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.20 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 153g (0.34 lbs) 100g (0.22 lbs)
Dimensions 101 x 60 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") 90 x 56 x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID KLIC-7003 EN-EL10
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (3 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at release $170 $56