Clicky

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS

Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Kodak EasyShare M550 front
 
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs

Kodak M550
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 125g - 98 x 58 x 23mm
  • Released January 2010
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Released December 2012
Photography Glossary

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview

Below is a in depth review of the Kodak M550 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the M550 (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is very close but the M550 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") use totally different sensor size.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The M550 was announced 3 years earlier than the XZ-2 iHS and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the M550 scores versus the XZ-2 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M550 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 M550 XZ-2 iHS 

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Kodak M550

 XZ-2 iHS M550 
ReleasedDecember 2012January 2010More recent by 35 months
Focus manually Dial precise focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kCrisper display (+690k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Kodak M550 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 M550 XZ-2 iHS 
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Kodak M550 provides outside measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).

Analyze the Kodak M550 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at that moment. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the M550 versus the XZ-2 iHS.

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M550 and XZ-2 iHS is 95 and 85 respectively.

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be hard to see the difference in sensor measurements simply by viewing specs. The photograph below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the M550 and XZ-2 iHS.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact megapixel count but not the same sensor measurements. The M550 uses the smaller sensor which should make achieving bokeh tougher. The older M550 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak M550
Portrait photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
21
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
46
focusing manually
provides face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
low MP (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Street Comparison

Kodak M550 Street photography factors
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Street photography factors
54
lighter than competition in class (125g)
no moving screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
maximum ISO low (1,000)
66
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
more heavy than others in class (346 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Kodak M550 Sports photography highlights
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sports photography highlights
17
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
43
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking focus
better than average battery life (340 per charge)
low MP (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Kodak M550 Travel photography information
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography information
67
lighter than competition in class (125g)
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f)
does not have Time Lapse recording
MP count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
61
better than average battery life (340 per charge)
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than others in class (346 grams)
low MP (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M550 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography highlights
31
rather wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (1,000)
does not have RAW support
does not have Time Lapse recording
55
focusing manually
fairly wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
better than average battery life (340 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
low MP (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
doesn't have Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M550 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Vlogging camera
31
rather wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f)
lighter than competition in class (125g)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have mic jack
36
fairly wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
has microphone jack
display isn't selfie friendly
more heavy than others in class (346g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M550 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
 Kodak EasyShare M550Olympus XZ-2 iHS
General Information
Brand Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak EasyShare M550 Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Released 2010-01-05 2012-12-18
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 1000 12800
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points - 35
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28-112mm (4.0x)
Max aperture - f/1.8-2.5
Macro focus distance 10cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30s 60s
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.50 m 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 125 grams (0.28 pounds) 346 grams (0.76 pounds)
Dimensions 98 x 58 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 49
DXO Color Depth score not tested 20.4
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.3
DXO Low light score not tested 216
Other
Battery life - 340 photographs
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery model KLIC-7006 Li-90B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, double) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Retail price $119 $450