Clicky

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST95

Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
24
Overall
31
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
 
Samsung ST95 front
Portability
99
Imaging
39
Features
19
Overall
31

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs

Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Samsung ST95
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Released January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST95 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST95, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Samsung. The resolution of the M575 (14MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is relatively comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The M575 was launched 12 months before the ST95 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before diving through a full comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the M575 grades against the ST95 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Samsung ST95

 M575 ST95 

Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Kodak M575

 ST95 M575 
ReleasedJanuary 2011January 2010Fresher by 12 months
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Kodak M575 and Samsung ST95

 M575 ST95 
Manually focus Lack of manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen sizing
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither has Touch friendly screen

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to carry your camera, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Kodak M575 has external measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST95 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Take a look at the Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST95 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the M575 versus the ST95.

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST95 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the M575 and ST95 is 95 and 99 respectively.

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST95 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison

Generally, its hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizing simply by checking out specs. The visual below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the M575 and ST95.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Samsung ST95 to produce greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The older M575 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST95 sensor size comparison

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M575 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung ST95 as a Portrait photography camera
28
decent MP (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
30
MP count decent (16MP)
no manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Kodak M575 as a Street photography camera
Samsung ST95 as a Street photography camera
48
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
more heavy than average (152g)
max ISO too low (1,000)
50
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
low maximum ISO (0)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Kodak M575 Sports photography advice
Samsung ST95 Sports photography advice
26
decent MP (14MP)
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
27
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
fixed focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Kodak M575 Travel photography info
Samsung ST95 Travel photography info
68
decent MP (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than average (152 grams)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
71
MP count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
great max aperture (f)
does not have Timelapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak M575
Landscape photography with Samsung ST95
40
really wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (1,000)
no RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
38
great max aperture (f)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
MP count decent (16MP)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (()mm)
no manual control
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (0)
no RAW support
does not have Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M575 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung ST95 as a Vlogging camera
28
really wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of microphone support
more heavy than average (152 grams)
27
great max aperture (f)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external microphone support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M575 and Samsung ST95
 Kodak EasyShare M575Samsung ST95
General Information
Brand Kodak Samsung
Model Kodak EasyShare M575 Samsung ST95
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2010-01-05 2011-01-19
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1000 -
Min native ISO 80 -
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) ()
Macro focus range 10cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.50 m -
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off -
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 152g (0.34 lbs) -
Dimensions 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7006 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $139 $145