Kodak M580 vs Olympus FE-5010
90 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
![Kodak EasyShare M580 front Kodak EasyShare M580 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Kodak-EasyShare-M580.jpg)
![Olympus FE-5010 front Olympus FE-5010 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-FE-5010/Olympus-FE-5010-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Kodak M580 vs Olympus FE-5010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 59 x 56mm
- Revealed July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-180mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 130g - 96 x 57 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M580 vs Olympus FE-5010 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Kodak M580 versus Olympus FE-5010, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the M580 (14MP) and the FE-5010 (12MP) is relatively similar and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
The M580 was introduced 7 months after the FE-5010 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the M580 grades versus the FE-5010 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M580 vs Olympus FE-5010 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare M580 and Olympus FE-5010. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak M580 Gallery and Olympus FE-5010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M580 over the Olympus FE-5010
M580 | FE-5010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2009 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 7 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5010 over the Kodak M580
FE-5010 | M580 |
---|
Common features in the Kodak M580 and Olympus FE-5010
M580 | FE-5010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Kodak M580 vs Olympus FE-5010 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Kodak M580 has got outer measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Olympus FE-5010 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs).
Examine the Kodak M580 versus Olympus FE-5010 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the M580 vs the FE-5010.
![Kodak M580 vs Olympus FE-5010 size comparison Kodak M580 vs Olympus FE-5010 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M580-vs-Olympus-FE-5010-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M580 and FE-5010 is 90 and 96 respectively.
![Kodak M580 vs Olympus FE-5010 top view buttons comparison Kodak M580 vs Olympus FE-5010 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M580-vs-Olympus-FE-5010-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak M580 vs Olympus FE-5010 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizes just by going over technical specs. The picture below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the M580 and FE-5010.
As you can tell, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Kodak M580 to deliver more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The fresher M580 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
![Kodak M580 vs Olympus FE-5010 sensor size comparison Kodak M580 vs Olympus FE-5010 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M580-vs-Olympus-FE-5010-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak M580 vs Olympus FE-5010 Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak M580 vs Olympus FE-5010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak M580 vs Olympus FE-5010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M580-vs-Olympus-FE-5010-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M580 vs Olympus FE-5010 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M580 | Olympus FE-5010 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Kodak | Olympus |
Model | Kodak EasyShare M580 | Olympus FE-5010 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-07-29 | 2009-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 36-180mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 150 grams (0.33 pounds) | 130 grams (0.29 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") | 96 x 57 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | KLIC-7006 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | xD-Picture Card (1GB, 2GB), microSD (MASD-1 is required) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $169 | $130 |