Kodak Mini vs Samsung TL210
97 Imaging
32 Features
13 Overall
24
![Kodak EasyShare Mini front Kodak EasyShare Mini front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-Mini/Kodak-Mini-front.jpg)
![Samsung TL210 front Samsung TL210 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-TL210/Samsung-TL210-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Kodak Mini vs Samsung TL210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-87mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
- 99g - 86 x 53 x 18mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-135mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
- Also Known as PL150
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Mini vs Samsung TL210 Overview
Here is a detailed comparison of the Kodak Mini vs Samsung TL210, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Samsung. The image resolution of the Mini (10MP) and the TL210 (12MP) is relatively similar but the Mini (1/3") and TL210 (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The Mini was revealed 13 months later than the TL210 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the Mini scores against the TL210 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Mini vs Samsung TL210 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare Mini & Samsung TL210. The full galleries are provided at Kodak Mini Gallery & Samsung TL210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Mini over the Samsung TL210
Mini | TL210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL210 over the Kodak Mini
TL210 | Mini | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+1") |
Common features in the Kodak Mini and Samsung TL210
Mini | TL210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Kodak Mini vs Samsung TL210 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Kodak Mini provides external dimensions of 86mm x 53mm x 18mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of 99 grams (0.22 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL210 has measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
See the Kodak Mini vs Samsung TL210 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the Mini compared to the TL210.
![Kodak Mini vs Samsung TL210 size comparison Kodak Mini vs Samsung TL210 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Mini-vs-Samsung-TL210-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Mini and TL210 is 97 and 94 respectively.
![Kodak Mini vs Samsung TL210 top view buttons comparison Kodak Mini vs Samsung TL210 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Mini-vs-Samsung-TL210-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak Mini vs Samsung TL210 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizing purely by going over specifications. The photograph here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Mini and TL210.
To sum up, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Mini using its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Samsung TL210 will offer greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots more aggressively. The fresher Mini provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
![Kodak Mini vs Samsung TL210 sensor size comparison Kodak Mini vs Samsung TL210 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Mini-vs-Samsung-TL210-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak Mini vs Samsung TL210 Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak Mini vs Samsung TL210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak Mini vs Samsung TL210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Mini-vs-Samsung-TL210-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Mini vs Samsung TL210 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Mini | Samsung TL210 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Kodak | Samsung |
Model | Kodak EasyShare Mini | Samsung TL210 |
Also called | - | PL150 |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2011-01-04 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 4.8 x 3.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 17.3mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3640 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1000 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 29-87mm (3.0x) | 27-135mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-4.8 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 7.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3.5" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 3.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 99 grams (0.22 lb) | 177 grams (0.39 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 86 x 53 x 18mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | KLIC-7006 | SLB-07B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $100 | $230 |