Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS42
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Introduced October 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-500
- Renewed by Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Increase to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Released April 2009
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FS42, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-500 (8MP) and the FS42 (10MP) is very similar but the E-500 (Four Thirds) and FS42 (1/2.5") enjoy different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-500 was manufactured 4 years before the FS42 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-500 scores vs the FS42 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-500 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic FS42
E-500 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus E-500
FS42 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2009 | October 2005 | Fresher by 42 months | |
Display resolution | 230k | 215k | Clearer display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FS42
E-500 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 2.5" | 2.5" | Identical display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-500 enjoys outside dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Panasonic FS42 has measurements of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FS42 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-500 vs the FS42.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and FS42 is 70 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing merely by going over specs. The graphic here may give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and FS42.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-500 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Panasonic FS42 will offer greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Alternate name | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2005-10-21 | 2009-04-17 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 1000 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 2.5" |
Screen resolution | 215 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 479 grams (1.06 pounds) | 132 grams (0.29 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $600 | $580 |