Kodak Mini vs Sony TX200V
97 Imaging
32 Features
13 Overall
24
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Kodak Mini vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-87mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
- 99g - 86 x 53 x 18mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak Mini vs Sony TX200V Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Kodak Mini versus Sony TX200V, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the Mini (10MP) and TX200V (18MP) and the Mini (1/3") and TX200V (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Mini was released 13 months earlier than the TX200V which makes them a generation away from one another. Both cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the Mini grades versus the TX200V for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak Mini vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare Mini & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The complete galleries are available at Kodak Mini Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Mini over the Sony TX200V
| Mini | TX200V |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Kodak Mini
| TX200V | Mini | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 13 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3.3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+1000k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Kodak Mini and Sony TX200V
| Mini | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Kodak Mini vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Kodak Mini provides exterior measurements of 86mm x 53mm x 18mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of 99 grams (0.22 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has specifications of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak Mini versus Sony TX200V in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the Mini versus the TX200V.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Mini and TX200V is 97 and 96 respectively.
Kodak Mini vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to see the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by seeing technical specs. The pic below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Mini and TX200V.
As you have seen, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Mini featuring a smaller sensor will make getting bokeh more challenging and the Sony TX200V will show extra detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged Mini will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Kodak Mini vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Kodak Mini vs Sony TX200V Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Mini | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Sony |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Mini | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2011-01-04 | 2012-01-30 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 4.8 x 3.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 17.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 18MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3640 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 1000 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 29-87mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-4.8 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 7.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3.3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 2 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 99g (0.22 pounds) | 129g (0.28 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 86 x 53 x 18mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | KLIC-7006 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $100 | $500 |
