Kodak Sport vs Panasonic Lumix LS5: The Real-World Camera Showdown of Budget Compacts

Choosing the right compact camera can feel like a jungle, especially when you’re balancing features, price, and your actual photography goals. Two budget-friendly options that often come up are the Kodak EasyShare Sport and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LS5 - both introduced in 2011 with a small sensor, pocketable form, but wildly different target uses.

Having taken both models through their paces over several weeks - across diverse shooting styles from casual travel snaps to outdoor adventures - I’m excited to share a detailed, no-fluff comparison. This is for the cheapskates and clubs-for-thumbs alike, for the enthusiast who wants decent image quality without breaking the bank, and for the everyday photographer keen on one solid, reliable point-and-click.

Let’s dive in. Expect hands-on insights, technical analysis, and practical advice so you can decide which camera - and compromise - is right for you.

Size, Handling, and Build Durability - How Do They Feel in Your Hands?

Before one even powers up these cameras, size and ergonomics matter - how it feels can make or break the shooting experience.

Kodak Sport stands out immediately for being a rugged waterproof camera designed to take punishment. Its physically larger chassis (147mm long by 58mm high, 23mm thick) gives it a chunky, durable feel in the hands, with a hefty 175g weight including two AAs. The body has a textured grip with oversized buttons that work marvelously with wet or gloved fingers - critical for diving or hiking.

By contrast, the Panasonic LS5 opts for a smaller, lighter approach: 97x62x27 mm and just 126g on AA batteries. It’s sleek but noticeably plasticky in build. Definitely aimed at casual everyday use rather than rough environments. It slips comfortably into most pockets and fits smaller hands better, but it feels less solid and less confident for outdoor abuse.

For those into adventure or water sports, Kodak’s waterproof and dustproof sealing puts it miles ahead on durability and peace of mind. Meanwhile, Panasonic’s more refined shape and lighter weight may appeal more to street shooters and travelers prioritizing portability.

Looking at control layouts, Kodak’s buttons are larger and more tactile but fewer in number - less about customization, more about straightforward operation. Panasonic offers nine autofocus points and more menu options, but the smaller buttons require more careful finger placement.

Verdict: For durability and weather resistance, Kodak wins hands down; for pocket-friendliness and refined ergonomics, Panasonic scores.

Sensor Tech and Image Quality - What Do Those Tiny Chips Deliver?

Image quality is king, even in small-sensor compacts. Both cameras share a traditional 1/2.3" CCD sensor - a 2011-era standard that’s not going to match today’s back-illuminated CMOS sensors but offers respectable color rendition if managed right.

Kodak Sport packs a 12MP sensor capturing 4000x3000 pixels max resolution with an ISO range of 80-1250 (no boosted ISO). Notably, Kodak places an anti-aliasing filter before the sensor to reduce moiré at the expense of slight softness. The sensor is about 6.17x4.55mm (28 mm² area).

On the other hand, Panasonic LS5 squeezes a tad more resolution - 14MP (4320x3240 max) with an extended ISO ceiling of 6400 (though noise becomes a plague beyond ISO 800+). Its sensor is negligible smaller (6.08x4.56mm, 27.7 mm²) but optical design and image processing are where this camera tries to edge forward.

In my tests shooting the same scene side-by-side on sunny days, Panasonic produced sharper images with richer detail, likely due to its higher native resolution and slightly faster lens (F2.8 at wide). Kodak’s images appear softer but with more neutral color reproduction - good for skin tones but less punch in landscapes.

Low-light performance was uneven: Kodak capped out at ISO 1250, which keeps noise manageable but requires longer exposures. Panasonic’s high ISO is impressive on paper, but grain and chroma noise creep in past ISO 400, limiting usability.

No RAW support on either (a real bummer for the pixel-peekers), so you’re stuck with JPEGs. Both cameras apply heavy noise reduction and sharpening in post-processing internally, which blunt detail but keep images nice on screen.

Screen & Viewfinder Experience - What Are You Actually Looking At?

Shooting comfort often boils down to the rear screen, especially when neither camera uses an optical or electronic viewfinder.

The Kodak Sport comes with a tiny 2.4" fixed, non-touch TFT LCD with low 112k-dot resolution. This feels grainy and dim, making framing and reviewing shots outdoors a challenge. The display brightness also maxes out subdued, which is frustrating under bright sunlight or underwater.

Panasonic LS5 boasts a slightly larger 2.7" LCD and more than double the resolution (230k dots), making image composition and menu navigation easier on the eyes. Color balance and contrast also feel more natural on this screen under varied lighting.

Neither screen is touch-enabled, so you’re navigating menus with the chunky buttons we mentioned earlier. The lack of viewfinder means relying on these LCDs exclusively, which impacts long shooting sessions or fast-paced photography where quick framing is key.

Pro Tip: For both, adding a hood or using an external screen loupe can help in bright conditions.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed - Can They Keep Up with Life?

Neither camera targets professionals needing blazing-fast autofocus or high frame rates, but autofocus behavior and shutter response times matter, especially when capturing wildlife action or candid street moments.

The Kodak Sport’s autofocus uses a very basic contrast-detection system with a single center-point AF area and face detection enabled. It hunts noticeably in low light and does not support continuous or tracking AF modes. It lacks burst shooting, so every shot is a deliberate press-and-wait.

The Panasonic LS5 steps it up slightly with 9 autofocus points (contrasted-focused as well) and can shoot single frames at approx 1 fps. Face detection is also included, but sluggish AF in dim or complex scenes remains a problem.

Neither model supports manual focus, focus bracketing, or focus stacking, so your options for precision or creative focusing effects are limited.

For wildlife or sports enthusiasts craving speed and tracking, neither camera will satisfy; you’d be better served looking into entry-level DSLRs or mirrorless systems. But for casual snapshots or family events, autofocus is ‘good enough’ on Panasonic and acceptable-but-slow on Kodak.

Lens Coverage and Image Stabilization - Flexibility and Sharp Shots on the Go

The fixed lens on these cameras defines their knack for various photography styles.

Kodak Sport features a surprisingly straightforward 35mm equivalent prime lens (F3.0). This narrower zoom range is unusual for a rugged camera but simplifies the design, reducing moving parts that could fail underwater. However, it limits versatility, especially for landscapes or tight indoor framing.

By comparison, Panasonic LS5 offers a versatile 5x zoom from 26mm wide-angle to 130mm telephoto. This range is extremely useful for travel and street shooting scenarios where switching from sweeping vistas to isolated subjects matters.

Most critically, Panasonic includes optical image stabilization (OIS) in the lens assembly, a rare blessing in this price range. During handheld shots in low light or at longer zooms, OIS helps keep images crisp, which the Kodak Sport sorely lacks.

The Kodak lens aperture is fixed to F3.0, while Panasonic’s varies from F2.8 wide open to F6.5 at tele. This means Panasonic provides better control over depth of field and can gather more light at the wide end, translating to brighter, sharper images in tricky conditions.

Durability, Waterproofing & Environmental Resistance - Built to Brave the Elements?

If you live for adventure photography or trips that flirt with the extreme, camera durability isn't just a feature - it's survival insurance.

The Kodak Sport is the clear champion here. Waterproof (up to 3 meters without casing), dustproof, and reasonably shock-resistant, this camera is built for rugged outings. I took it snorkeling and hiking in wet weather, and it kept ticking without a hitch. No special cases required.

In contrast, the Panasonic LS5 lacks any environmental sealing - no waterproof or dustproof credentials. It’s a delicate flower that needs protecting from rain or dirt. You’ll need extra gear (plastic sleeves, dry bags) if you want to venture anywhere wet or sandy.

Battery Life and Storage - How Long Can You Shoot?

Stamina runners and casual explorers alike want to know how long their cameras last on the go.

Both cameras rely on 2 AA batteries - a blessing for those in the field where recharge’s uncertain and spares fit in any bag.

The Panasonic LS5 has an official battery life rating of about 160 shots (CIPA standard). In testing, with modest use of LCD and occasional snapshots, this translated roughly to a full day of casual shooting without complaints.

Kodak Sport does not list official battery life. However, my experience suggested a similar range, though the added burden of powering a waterproof body and flash means battery drains slightly faster under active use. Using high-quality alkaline or better yet, rechargeable NiMH batteries is a must.

Both cameras store photos on SD/SDHC cards with a single slot and an internal buffer adequate for their slow continuous shooting speeds.

Connectivity and Extras - What About Sharing and Video?

Given their 2011 vintage and budget category, wireless bells and whistles are minimal to nonexistent.

Neither camera offers Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC, so you’re stuck with transferring images by removing the card or USB 2.0 cable.

Videographers won’t find 4K or even full HD. The Kodak Sport maxes out at 640x480 VGA (30fps) with Motion JPEG compression, a relic that feels grainy and unusable for anything but casual clips.

Panasonic LS5 does better with 720p HD video at 30 frames per second, somewhat decent for family moments or YouTube dabbling but nowhere near professional standards. No external microphone ports or headphone jacks are present on either.

Real-World Performance Across Photography Genres

Knowing specs is only half the battle. Here’s how these cameras shape up shooting in popular genres.

Kodak Sport front Kodak Sport screen back Panasonic LS5 front Panasonic LS5 screen back

Portrait Photography

• Kodak Sport color rendition handles skin tones naturally but limited aperture (F3.0) and fixed focal length yield less pleasing bokeh (background blur). Face detection works, but autofocus can hunt in soft light.
• Panasonic LS5 offers wider aperture at 26mm (F2.8) and zoom, allowing for tighter portraits with more background control. Face detection is also present but autofocusing is similarly slow.

Landscape Photography

• Panasonic LS5 wins for wider-angle lens (26mm vs 35mm) and higher resolution sensor giving more detail. Lack of weather sealing means cautious use outdoors.
• Kodak Sport’s rugged shell is great for rough outdoor shoots but narrower angle and softer lens limit landscape impact.

Wildlife Photography

• Neither camera’s autofocus or burst rate (Kodak none, Panasonic 1 fps) is up to serious wildlife work.
• Panasonic’s zoom provides flexibility but laggy AF hinders capturing fast animals.

Sports Photography

• Neither camera suitable for fast action. Burst speeds and AF tracking are minimal or missing.

Street Photography

• Panasonic’s smaller size and zoom versatility make it a better street camera, although noisy high ISO and no viewfinder limit discretion.
• Kodak’s bulk and tougher body impede quick urban shooting but ruggedness impresses for roadside or rainy day shooting.

Macro Photography

• Neither offers close focusing specs or macro bells, making them poor candidates for serious macro.

Night/Astro Photography

• Both cameras struggle with noise due to sensor size and CCD tech. Long exposures capped at ~8 seconds max.
• Panasonic’s higher ISO and stabilization give a slight edge but neither excels.

Video Capabilities

• Panasonic LS5’s 720p makes for decent casual video.
• Kodak sport limited to 640x480 VGA, outdated for any serious work.

Travel Photography

• Kodak’s bulk is a tradeoff for waterproof confidence.
• Panasonic’s zoom and lighter weight make it more travel-friendly in general conditions.

Professional Work

• Neither supports RAW or advanced workflows, so their place is limited to casual backup or quick grab shots.

Whose Buttons Do I Like to Push? Ergonomics and Interface in Depth

Handling small cameras involves compromise, but some designs simply feel more thoughtful.

The Kodak Sport’s oversized buttons, big enough for gloves or fingers fumbling post-surf, emphasise outdoor usability. Menus are minimalistic - no complicated settings or modes. While this limits creative control, it’s a boon for ‘set and shoot’ simplicity.

The Panasonic LS5 offers more autofocus points and customizable white balance, but its small buttons and menu navigation feel cramped if you have bigger hands or want quick access. Also, LCD quality combined with the tight controls makes you wish you had a touchscreen (or at least a dial).

Pricing and Value: What You Pay vs What You Get

At the time of review, the Kodak Sport tiptoes around $155, targeting adventurous casual shooters needing ruggedness without digital bells and whistles.

The Panasonic LS5 comes in at approximately $294, almost doubling Kodak’s price but offering better image quality, optical stabilization, and zoom versatility.

Is Panasonic’s extra $140 worth it? For everyday casual shooting, travel where image quality and zoom count, yes. For beach bums and poolside fun where durability is king, Kodak makes more sense.

The Genre-Specific Breakdown - Which Camera Excels Where?

Final Recommendations: Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Kodak EasyShare Sport if:

• You’re an outdoor adventurer needing a rugged, waterproof camera.
• You want a budget-friendly point-and-shoot for harsh conditions.
• You don’t mind compromised zoom range or image quality.
• Portability and pocket-fitting are less important than durability.
• You want intuitive, click-and-go controls without fuss.

Opt for the Panasonic Lumix LS5 if:

• You want better image quality with higher resolution and zoom.
• You shoot a variety of subjects - portraits, landscapes, street.
• You prioritize optical stabilization and a sharper screen.
• You’re mostly shooting in normal weather and want a compact travel-friendly design.
• You want improved video (720p HD) and more refined controls.

Wrapping It Up - The Real Deal in Compact Cameras Circa 2011

Neither camera will blow your socks off by today’s standards; small sensor compacts made major advances after these models disappeared from the spotlight. However, they each find a niche.

In my extensive hands-on testing, I found the Kodak Sport shines where ruggedness, weather sealing, and simplicity are paramount. It’s a guaranteed companion for splashing through puddles or digressing off the beaten path.

The Panasonic LS5, despite lacking ruggedness, offers superior image sharpness, facility, and general photographic versatility making it a better everyday shooter for the casual enthusiast.

Both suffer from slow autofocus, no RAW, and limited video capabilities, so expect to keep your ambitions modest or plan on upgrading sooner than later. But for a budget-friendly, beginner-level compact camera around $150-$300 - each delivers sensible value with tradeoffs clearly laid on the table.

If I were to pick one out of pure photographic merit - and could keep it safe - it’d be the Panasonic LS5 for versatility. But if I planned to kayak, hike a rainforest trail, or just want worry-free splash-proof shooting, Kodak Sport wins my rugged-heart vote.

Happy shooting, wherever your adventures take you.

Note: All testing was done using standard evaluation protocols common in industry reviews, including side-by-side shooting in natural lighting scenarios and timed battery endurance tests. Image samples and controlled charts used to assess sensor quality, autofocus accuracy, and image stabilization performance.