Clicky

Kodak Sport vs Samsung SL102

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
13
Overall
26
Kodak EasyShare Sport front
 
Samsung SL102 front
Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
21
Overall
28

Kodak Sport vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs

Kodak Sport
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1250
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35mm (F3.0) lens
  • 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
  • Launched January 2011
Samsung SL102
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F) lens
  • 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
  • Revealed January 2009
  • Alternate Name is ES55
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Kodak Sport vs Samsung SL102 Overview

Here, we are reviewing the Kodak Sport and Samsung SL102, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Kodak and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Sport (12MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is very well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The Sport was revealed 2 years later than the SL102 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the Sport matches up versus the SL102 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Samsung SL102

 Sport SL102 
RevealedJanuary 2011January 2009Fresher by 25 months

Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Kodak Sport

 SL102 Sport 
Display size2.5"2.4"Larger display (+0.1")
Display resolution230k112kSharper display (+118k dot)

Common features in the Kodak Sport and Samsung SL102

 Sport SL102 
Manual focus Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither includes Touch friendly display

Kodak Sport vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Kodak Sport features physical dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Samsung SL102 has sizing of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).

Analyze the Kodak Sport and Samsung SL102 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the Sport compared to the SL102.

Kodak Sport vs Samsung SL102 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Sport and SL102 is 92 and 96 respectively.

Kodak Sport vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Sport vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very hard to envision the difference between sensor sizing just by checking specs. The photograph underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Sport and SL102.

As you can plainly see, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Kodak Sport to resolve greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images way more aggressively. The more modern Sport is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Kodak Sport vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison

Kodak Sport vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Sport vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak Sport
Portrait photography with Samsung SL102
26
features face detection focusing
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
25
has face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak Sport
Street photography with Samsung SL102
52
weather proof
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
low maximum ISO (1,250)
55
lighter than competition (116g)
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Kodak Sport as a Sports photography camera
Samsung SL102 as a Sports photography camera
23
weather proof
focal length is fixed (35mm)
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
16
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Kodak Sport Travel photography highlights
Samsung SL102 Travel photography highlights
57
weather proof
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
sensor resolution low (12MP)
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
62
lighter than competition (116 grams)
built-in flash
very good max aperture (f)
lack of Time Lapse function
sensor resolution low (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (35mm)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Sport Landscape photography factors
Samsung SL102 Landscape photography factors
27
weather proof
no manual focus
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
small screen (2.4 inches)
lack of manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (1,250)
has no RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
27
very good max aperture (f)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
lack of Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak Sport
Vlogging with Samsung SL102
25
features face detection focusing
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
does not posses selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external microphone socket
30
very good max aperture (f)
has face detection autofocus
lighter than competition (116 grams)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external mic port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak Sport vs Samsung SL102 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Sport and Samsung SL102
 Kodak EasyShare SportSamsung SL102
General Information
Company Kodak Samsung
Model type Kodak EasyShare Sport Samsung SL102
Also referred to as - ES55
Category Waterproof Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2011-01-04 2009-01-08
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 1250 1600
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35mm (1x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Max aperture f/3.0 -
Macro focusing distance - 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.4 inches 2.5 inches
Display resolution 112k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 secs 8 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/1500 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 175g (0.39 lb) 116g (0.26 lb)
Physical dimensions 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID 2 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Storage slots One One
Retail price $155 $130