Clicky

Kodak Touch vs Sony W320

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
34
Overall
35
Kodak EasyShare Touch front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front
Portability
97
Imaging
37
Features
21
Overall
30

Kodak Touch vs Sony W320 Key Specs

Kodak Touch
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2011
Sony W320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
  • Released January 2010
Photography Glossary

Kodak Touch vs Sony W320 Overview

Following is a in depth analysis of the Kodak Touch and Sony W320, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Kodak and Sony. The sensor resolution of the Touch (14MP) and the W320 (14MP) is relatively comparable but the Touch (1/3") and W320 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The Touch was manufactured 13 months after the W320 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the Touch scores vs the W320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Touch over the Sony W320

 Touch W320 
ReleasedJanuary 2011January 2010More modern by 13 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Kodak Touch

 W320 Touch 

Common features in the Kodak Touch and Sony W320

 Touch W320 
Manually focus No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Kodak Touch vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Touch offers external dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Sony W320 has dimensions of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

Look at the Kodak Touch and Sony W320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the Touch versus the W320.

Kodak Touch vs Sony W320 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Touch and W320 is 95 and 97 respectively.

Kodak Touch vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Touch vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes purely by checking out specifications. The pic below will give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Touch and W320.

Plainly, the two cameras posses the exact same MP albeit not the same sensor sizes. The Touch has the smaller sensor which is going to make achieving shallower DOF harder. The newer Touch will have a benefit in sensor technology.

Kodak Touch vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison

Kodak Touch vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Touch vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Touch Portrait photography highlights
Sony W320 Portrait photography highlights
33
good megapixels (14MP)
comes with face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/3")
does not have RAW files
28
decent MP (14MP)
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Kodak Touch Street photography information
Sony W320 Street photography information
48
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/3")
does not have RAW files
heavier than competition (150 grams)
49
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak Touch
Sports photography with Sony W320
28
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
26
decent MP (14MP)
max fps low (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Kodak Touch Travel photography info
Sony W320 Travel photography info
68
good megapixels (14MP)
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f)
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (150g)
display isn't selfie friendly
66
decent MP (14MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (26mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
does not have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak Touch
Landscape photography with Sony W320
42
quite wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f)
good sized screen (3 inches)
good megapixels (14MP)
manual focus not available
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/3")
does not have RAW files
missing Time Lapse recording
33
rather wide (26mm)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
screen is small (2.7")
manual exposure not possible
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
lack of Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak Touch
Vlogging with Sony W320
31
quite wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f)
screen is touchscreen
comes with face detection autofocus
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external mic socket
heavier than competition (150g)
26
rather wide (26mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of external mic socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak Touch vs Sony W320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Touch and Sony W320
 Kodak EasyShare TouchSony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
General Information
Brand Kodak Sony
Model Kodak EasyShare Touch Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Launched 2011-01-04 2010-01-07
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 4.8 x 3.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 17.3mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4288 x 3216 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 26-105mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.7-5.7
Macro focus distance 5cm 4cm
Crop factor 7.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 2.7"
Screen resolution 460k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds 1 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/1600 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.20 m 4.80 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 150g (0.33 lb) 117g (0.26 lb)
Dimensions 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7006 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch price $100 $269