Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 III
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
53 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Launched March 2016
- Previous Model is Sony RX10 II
- New Model is Sony RX10 IV
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 III Overview
The following is a extended overview of the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Sony RX10 III, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and RX10 III (1") boast totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-2 iHS was announced 3 years before the RX10 III which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the TG-2 iHS matches up vs the RX10 III in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 III Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Sony RX10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Sony RX10 III
TG-2 iHS | RX10 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
RX10 III | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2016 | June 2013 | Newer by 33 months | |
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 610k | Crisper screen (+619k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony RX10 III
TG-2 iHS | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-2 iHS has external dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sony RX10 III has sizing of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") and a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Sony RX10 III in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at the time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-2 iHS compared to the RX10 III.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-2 iHS and RX10 III is 91 and 53 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to see the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading technical specs. The pic here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-2 iHS and RX10 III.
As you have seen, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-2 iHS with its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF harder and the Sony RX10 III will offer more detail with its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged TG-2 iHS is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 III Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2013-06-28 | 2016-03-29 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 610k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 14.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) | 1051 gr (2.32 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 472 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 420 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $380 | $1,398 |