Kodak Z5120 vs Nikon P510: The Superzoom Bridge Battle You Didn’t Know You Needed

Choosing a superzoom bridge camera in the ever-evolving digital market can sometimes feel like picking between apples and - well, slightly different apples. Today, we’re diving deep into two contenders from the 2012 superzoom playground: Kodak’s easy-going Z5120 and Nikon’s ambitious P510. Both pack a punch with monstrous zoom ranges and SLR-like styling, but how do they really stack up when you put them through the wringer of real-world usage?

Having spent countless hours behind the viewfinder (sometimes squinting at tiny LCDs), I’ve put these two under my usual microscope - covering photography disciplines from portraiture to wildlife, examining sensor tech, ergonomics, and usability quirks. If you’re in the market for a budget-friendly superzoom or just fascinated by what these bridge beasts offer, read on.

Getting Physical: Size, Weight, and Ergonomics

Right off the bat, let’s talk feel - because no amount of megapixels can salvage a camera that’s uncomfortable to wield on a long shoot.

Both Kodak’s Z5120 and Nikon’s P510 sport the classic chunky bridge camera look, but there are noticeable differences.

The Kodak Z5120 measures in at 124 x 91 x 105 mm and weighs a lightweight 445g (using four AA batteries, no less). Its build tends towards plastic-heavy but surprisingly sturdy. The grip is sculpted just enough not to feel like you’re holding a bar of soap, and the body remains compact enough for travel.

Nikon’s P510 is a bit chunkier and heavier at 120 x 83 x 102 mm and 555g (using a proprietary lithium-ion battery). The heft feels more balanced and satisfying in the hand, thanks largely to Nikon’s attention to grip design and button placement. The P510 also boasts a slightly more robust frame, though neither camera is weather sealed - a disappointing omission if you plan to shoot outdoors in unpredictable conditions.

Ergonomically, the P510’s buttons feel more responsive, and its lens zoom ring offers smoother, more precise control - a boon when you’re stalking wildlife and need quick framing without fuss.

Design and Control Layout: Intuitive or Overwhelming?

You don’t want to wrestle your camera in the field, so button placement matters.

The Kodak Z5120 keeps things simple with a basic control layout - no touchscreen, no illuminated buttons, just straightforward dials and a modest 3-inch fixed LCD. It supports manual focus and offers exposure modes like shutter and aperture priority, which is impressive at this price point. However, the buttons aren’t backlit, which can challenge night-time operation.

Nikon stepped up with a 3-inch tilting LCD boasting 921k dots - making framing at tricky angles much easier. The P510 includes an electronic viewfinder (EVF), a huge advantage for composing shots under bright sunlight when LCD glare is a nightmare. Its dedicated movie button, ISO control, and direct access exposure controls show Nikon wasn’t messing around - this camera is built for more advanced shooting.

One downside: navigating the P510’s menu can feel like a rabbit hole. The Z5120’s simpler structure, while less feature-rich, feels more approachable for novices.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

Time for the guts. Both cameras feature a 1/2.3" sensor, standard for superzooms of this era, but the similarities mostly end there.

Kodak’s Z5120 uses a 16 MP CCD sensor - a sensor type known historically for excellent color rendition and lower high-ISO performance. Meanwhile, the Nikon P510 opts for a 16 MP backside-illuminated CMOS sensor. This BSI-CMOS design enhances light gathering efficiency, especially in low-light situations.

Practically speaking, this means the P510 produces cleaner images when shooting indoors or at dusk, with lower noise levels. Kodak’s CCD sensor, though capable, shows more noise above ISO 400 and struggles beyond ISO 800.

The maximum native ISO on the Z5120 is 6400 but don’t expect usable images at this setting - noise dominates. Nikon’s P510 caps at ISO 3200 natively (some extended boost possible), but with better noise control thanks to the BSI sensor architecture.

Kodak allows raw shooting - impressive at this tier - and despite the CCD’s limitations, that can help salvage images with post-processing. Nikon, somewhat surprisingly, lacks raw support, which might disappoint advanced users wanting full control over image editing.

Resolution-wise, the Z5120’s 4608x2456 max resolution suits landscape printing at moderate sizes but falls short compared to the P510’s 4608x3456, offering a better aspect ratio and more pixels to flex.

Discussing the Screen Experience

An image is only as good as what you see while composing it.

Kodak Z5120’s 3” fixed LCD, with only 230k dots, feels dated fast - image review is grainy, and focus checking is a strain. There’s no touchscreen or articulated movement to help grab creative angles, which can limit street and travel photography creativity.

Nikon P510's 3" tilting screen with 921k dots offers a far superior visual experience. The anti-reflection coating aids in sunny environments, and the tilt mechanism lets you shoot low-ground macro or awkward overhead shots without gymnastics. The inclusion of an EVF further boosts flexibility.

Autofocus and Zoom Performance: Eye on the Prize

When using a superzoom from wide to insane telephoto, speed and accuracy make or break your shooting experience.

Kodak sports a contrast-detection autofocus system with face detection, approaching focus speeds suitable mostly for static or slow-moving subjects. Given the lack of continuous autofocus, tracking sports or wildlife action isn’t advisable. The Kodak’s 26-676mm equivalent zoom covers an impressive 26x range and offers macro focusing at a razor-sharp 1cm, great for near-microscopic shots.

Nikon’s P510 steps things up with contrast detection plus AF tracking and face detection that is surprisingly competent given the sensor size. It can lock and maintain focus on moving subjects better than the Kodak.

Zooming from 24-1000 mm (a beastly 41.7x zoom ratio) means you can stalk distant wildlife or get tight framing on sports action. Backup that with a faster max shutter speed of 1/8000s (compared to Kodak’s 1/2000s) for freezing fast subjects. Macro shooting is respectable too, though minimum focus distance sits at 2cm - slightly less aggressive than Kodak’s one-centimeter wonder.

Continuous shooting rates also favor the Nikon at 7 fps against Kodak’s 6 fps - but neither are specialists here.

Low Light, Night, and Astro Potential: Can They Shine in the Dark?

With astrophotography and low-light shooting being niche but growing interests, let’s see if either camera can moonlight as night shooters.

Kodak’s max shutter speed tops out at 16 seconds - great for long exposures typical in night sky shots - paired with manual exposure controls. However, the noisy CCD sensor and limited ISO range mean image quality in night or astro shots will be compromised. The absence of features like live exposure histograms or bulb mode limits astrophotography ambitions.

The Nikon P510 offers a longer shutter speed range as well (up to 30 seconds), with built-in exposure bracketing disabled but white balance bracketing present. The BSI-CMOS sensor gives it a technical edge for low-light capability. Plus, with the tilting screen and EVF combo, composing stars or night scenes becomes less frustrating.

Neither camera is built for heavy-duty astrophotography, but the Nikon pulls slightly ahead for practical night shooting.

Video Capabilities: How Do They Stack Up?

In a time when hybrid photo-video shooting is the norm, video specs matter.

Kodak Z5120 records at max 1280 x 720p at 30 fps using H.264 compression. Decent for basic use but limited in resolution and frame rates. No external mic inputs and no touchscreen means video enthusiasts will feel boxed in.

The Nikon P510 leaps forward with Full HD 1080p recording at 30 fps plus 720p at both 60 and 30 fps, catering to smoother slow-motion options. It records in both MPEG-4 and H.264 formats, offering better compression and versatility. No mic port here either, a common superzoom compromise, but the HDMI output allows clean video out if paired with an external recorder.

Neither model offers advanced video features like 4K, but the Nikon’s higher resolution and frame rate combos make it the better pick for casual videographers.

Battery Life and Storage: Powering Your Adventures

Kodak sticks to a tried and tested formula - four AA batteries. This choice appeals to travelers who dislike hunting for proprietary batteries but adds weight and bulk. Battery life stats are scarce - expect moderate stamina with fresh alkalines, improving with rechargeables.

Nikon’s P510 uses the EN-EL5 rechargeable lithium-ion pack rated for around 200 shots per charge. In practice, this means you’ll want spares if shooting extensively. The proprietary battery keeps weight down but adds the hassle of charging infrastructure.

Both rely on a single SD card slot, with the Nikon P510 supporting SDXC cards - a nod to future-proofing file storage needs.

Connectivity and Wireless Options: Sharing and Working the Field

The Kodak and Nikon both support Eye-Fi card wireless image transfer, which was an innovative feature in 2012 but feels a bit quaint today. Neither camera offers Bluetooth or NFC.

Nikon scores additional points with built-in GPS, embedding location tags right into your photos - a huge plus for landscape, travel, and wildlife photographers who want geographic logging without additional gear.

Both cameras support USB 2.0 and HDMI outputs, though with no microphone or headphone jacks, live audio monitoring and recording options are limited.

The Lens Landscape: Fixed but Flexible

Both sport fixed lenses with monster zoom ranges.

Kodak Z5120 offers a 26-676 mm equivalent range with an aperture of f/2.8–5.6 - solid at the wide end for dimmer scenes and portraiture. The stellar macro capability (focusing down to 1 cm) is a boon for close-up shooters, though the variable max aperture means light transmission drops off in telephoto.

Nikon’s even more ambitious 24-1000 mm (f/3.0–5.9) lens expands your frame range spectacularly, trading some brightness at wide for massive reach. This is perfect for wildlife or sports shooters needing reach without lens swaps.

Neither offers interchangeable lens options, so you are stuck with the built-in optics, meaning the lens quality governs final image quality entirely.

Real-World Performance and Image Samples

After a field day snapping everything from portraits to landscapes, here’s what I found.

Kodak Z5120 front Kodak Z5120 screen back Nikon P510 front Nikon P510 screen back

• Portraits: Kodak’s CCD sensor provides warmer skin tones and pleasing bokeh wide open at 26mm, but Nikon’s slightly better resolution and sharper lenses produce cleaner images, albeit with cooler tone bias you might need to adjust.

• Landscape: Nikon’s higher resolution and wider dynamic range give it the edge for scenic shots, revealing finer detail in shadows and highlights.

• Wildlife & Sports: P510’s longer zoom and better autofocus tracking delivered more keepers during fast action. Kodak lagged noticeably.

• Street: Kodak’s lighter, more compact body and quieter operation made it easier to shoot candidly in low-light urban conditions, despite image quality compromises.

• Macro: Kodak’s 1 cm focus wins here, bringing tiny subjects into sharp relief better than the Nikon’s 2 cm minimum.

• Night: Both cameras struggle with noise but Nikon’s sensor keeps usable detail longer.

• Video: P510 provided smoother, higher-def footage.

Scoring and Value Analysis

Let’s quantify performance by category with the combined data.

Both cameras show strengths and weaknesses balancing budget and features. The Nikon P510 impresses with broader capability but at a price premium (around $600 launch price vs. Kodak’s $200).

Looking at genre-specific performance:

Nikon dominates in wildlife, sports, and landscapes. Kodak shines in macro, portraits (color warmth), and street photography for its portability.

Who Should Buy Which?

• You’re a budget-conscious enthusiast looking for a versatile superzoom to casually shoot travel, portraits, and close-ups without fuss: Kodak Z5120 is a solid entry-level choice with surprise raw shooting support.

• You want more reach, better image quality, and refined controls for outdoor, wildlife, or sports photography and don’t mind paying extra for those features: Nikon P510 is the clear winner, especially with its full HD video, electronic viewfinder, and GPS tagging.

• If portability and battery flexibility matter more than hardcore zoom or video specs, Kodak’s AA power and lighter weight might appeal.

• For hybrid shooters dabbling in video and stills: Nikon’s advanced video capabilities and zoom range shine.

Final Thoughts: Bridging the Gap with Smart Choices

The Kodak Z5120 and Nikon P510 represent two distinct philosophies in the superzoom bridge domain circa 2012.

Kodak delivers a budget-friendly, user-accessible option with surprising features like raw shooting and excellent macro focus. Its CCD sensor, while flattering in color, struggles in low light, and ergonomics are basic but effective.

Nikon’s P510 pushes superzoom boundaries with a massive 41.7x zoom, superior sensor tech, richer manual controls, and multimedia options. It comes at a higher price and weight but justifies this with better image quality and utility.

Both cameras have limitations intrinsic to their small sensor and fixed lens architecture but still cater well to their niche audiences.

For those stepping into superzoom territory today, these cameras remind us that smart compromises and unique strengths define good gear - not just the number on the zoom ring or megapixels alone.

In conclusion, choosing between the Kodak Z5120 and Nikon P510 boils down to your priorities: budget vs. performance, compactness vs. reach, or simplicity vs. control. Having tested both extensively, I can say neither disappoints in their sweet spot, and both can deliver satisfying images with a bit of patience and good light.

Happy shooting - and may your lens always find the perfect frame!

END