Kodak Z915 vs Samsung HZ35W
91 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Kodak Z915 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
- Also referred to as WB650
Photography Glossary Kodak Z915 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
The following is a thorough assessment of the Kodak Z915 vs Samsung HZ35W, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Kodak and Samsung. The image resolution of the Z915 (10MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is very close and both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Z915 was brought out 17 months prior to the HZ35W making them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the Z915 scores against the HZ35W with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Kodak Z915 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare Z915 & Samsung HZ35W. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak Z915 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Samsung HZ35W
| Z915 | HZ35W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Kodak Z915
| HZ35W | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2010 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 17 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Samsung HZ35W
| Z915 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Kodak Z915 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Kodak Z915 features exterior measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Kodak Z915 vs Samsung HZ35W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the Z915 against the HZ35W.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Z915 and HZ35W is 91 and 91 respectively.
Kodak Z915 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions only by viewing specs. The pic below might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Z915 and HZ35W.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Samsung HZ35W to render greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged Z915 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Kodak Z915 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Kodak Z915 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB650 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 gr (0.43 lb) | 245 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 2 x AA | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $200 | $300 |
