Kodak Z915 vs Samsung SL102
91 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a73cf/a73cf5c926d4a1a4b396487461558975bc5e20e0" alt="Kodak EasyShare Z915 front Kodak EasyShare Z915 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea7e4/ea7e4ee78f1fa0fb4022ac36c31077cfef4a19c1" alt="Samsung SL102 front Samsung SL102 front"
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Kodak Z915 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
- Additionally referred to as ES55
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Kodak Z915 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
In this write-up, we will be looking at the Kodak Z915 and Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Kodak and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Z915 (10MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is pretty well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The Z915 was brought out about the same time to the SL102 so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the Z915 grades vs the SL102 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Kodak Z915 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Z915 & Samsung SL102. The entire galleries are available at Kodak Z915 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Samsung SL102
Z915 | SL102 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Kodak Z915
SL102 | Z915 |
---|
Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Samsung SL102
Z915 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2009 | ![]() | January 2009 | Similar age |
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | ![]() | 2.5" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Kodak Z915 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Kodak Z915 has got exterior dimensions of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung SL102 has proportions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
See the Kodak Z915 and Samsung SL102 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the Z915 against the SL102.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2bce/c2bcec3640fca69f5deda4a8535a58384ad45453" alt="Kodak Z915 vs Samsung SL102 size comparison Kodak Z915 vs Samsung SL102 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Z915 and SL102 is 91 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4918d/4918d676c6e0e7b949ee6870cae18426058492af" alt="Kodak Z915 vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison Kodak Z915 vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison"
Kodak Z915 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions simply by checking specs. The image underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z915 and SL102.
All in all, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same resolution so you can expect similar quality of pictures however you should always consider the launch date of the products into consideration.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32552/325523d253c335fc3a6bf33d216080af1851ad2d" alt="Kodak Z915 vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison Kodak Z915 vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison"
Kodak Z915 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9650/f9650b9beebdada6f6d9c963a95f17803b237fef" alt="Kodak Z915 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak Z915 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Kodak Z915 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Kodak | Samsung |
Model | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Samsung SL102 |
Otherwise known as | - | ES55 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | - |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 194 gr (0.43 lbs) | 116 gr (0.26 lbs) |
Dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 2 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $200 | $130 |