Kodak Z981 vs Olympus VR-330
66 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Kodak Z981 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 540g - 124 x 85 x 105mm
- Released July 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched February 2011
- Superseded the Olympus VR-320
Photography Glossary Kodak Z981 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Kodak Z981 vs Olympus VR-330, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the Z981 (14MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Z981 was manufactured 7 months before the VR-330 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Kodak Z981 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the Z981 matches up vs the VR-330 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak Z981 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare Z981 & Olympus VR-330. The entire galleries are available at Kodak Z981 Gallery & Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z981 over the Olympus VR-330
| Z981 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Kodak Z981
| VR-330 | Z981 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2011 |  | July 2010 | Fresher by 7 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 201k | Sharper screen (+259k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z981 and Olympus VR-330
| Z981 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Kodak Z981 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Kodak Z981 features outer dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") along with a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Kodak Z981 vs Olympus VR-330 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the Z981 versus the VR-330.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Z981 and VR-330 is 66 and 94 respectively.
Kodak Z981 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizing only by reviewing specs. The graphic below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Z981 and VR-330.
All in all, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same MP therefore you can expect similar quality of files however you should always consider the age of the products into consideration. The older Z981 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Kodak Z981 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Kodak Z981 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z981 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z981 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-07-06 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 201 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 16 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.20 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 540 grams (1.19 lb) | 158 grams (0.35 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 85 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $299 | $220 |
