Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus VR-320
65 Imaging
45 Features
56 Overall
49


94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- New Model is Olympus VR-330

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Kodak and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and VR-320 (14MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

The Astro Zoom AZ651 was manufactured 2 years later than the VR-320 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 scores versus the VR-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 & Olympus VR-320. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Olympus VR-320
Astro Zoom AZ651 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | ![]() | July 2011 | Fresher by 31 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
VR-320 | Astro Zoom AZ651 |
---|
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Olympus VR-320
Astro Zoom AZ651 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display size |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 comes with physical measurements of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") along with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Olympus VR-320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and the VR-320.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and VR-320 is 65 and 94 respectively.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to picture the difference in sensor sizing merely by checking out specs. The graphic below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and VR-320.
All in all, both cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You can expect to see the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to produce extra detail due to its extra 7MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more recent Astro Zoom AZ651 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Kodak | Olympus |
Model type | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Olympus VR-320 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2014-01-07 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | - | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 9.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 567 gr (1.25 pounds) | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $419 | $179 |