Clicky

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB800F

Portability
65
Imaging
45
Features
56
Overall
49
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 front
 
Samsung WB800F front
Portability
92
Imaging
39
Features
51
Overall
43

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
(Full Review)
  • 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Launched January 2013
Photography Glossary

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB800F Overview

The following is a extensive assessment of the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Kodak and Samsung. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and WB800F (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The Astro Zoom AZ651 was introduced 13 months after the WB800F which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.

Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 scores versus the WB800F for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Samsung WB800F

 Astro Zoom AZ651 WB800F 
LaunchedJanuary 2014January 2013Newer by 13 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution920k460kCrisper screen (+460k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

 WB800F Astro Zoom AZ651 
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Samsung WB800F

 Astro Zoom AZ651 WB800F 
Manual focus More precise focus
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen sizing

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison

If you are intending to travel with your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 features outer dimensions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") and a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Take a look at the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and the WB800F.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB800F size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and WB800F is 65 and 92 respectively.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it's difficult to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions merely by checking specifications. The picture underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and WB800F.

Plainly, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can count on the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to give more detail using its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more modern Astro Zoom AZ651 should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Portrait photography factors
Samsung WB800F Portrait photography factors
53
you can focus manually
good resolution (21 megapixels)
supports face detection focus
saves RAW files
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
43
focusing manually
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
offers face detection focus
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
Street photography with Samsung WB800F
59
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
more heavy than average in class (567g)
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (218g)
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Sports photography details
Samsung WB800F Sports photography details
51
amazing zoom range (24-1560mm 65.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (21 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
52
great zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
Travel photography with Samsung WB800F
60
good resolution (21 megapixels)
built-in flash
selfie friendly screen
quite wide (24mm)
long zoom (1560mm)
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than average in class (567 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
69
lighter than average in class (218g)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (23mm)
very long reach (483mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Landscape photography advice
Samsung WB800F Landscape photography advice
54
you can focus manually
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (21MP)
saves RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of Timelapse function
49
focusing manually
pretty wide (23mm)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Vlogging features
Samsung WB800F Vlogging features
60
quite wide (24mm)
selfie friendly screen
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
lack of external microphone jack
more heavy than average in class (567 grams)
35
pretty wide (23mm)
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average in class (218 grams)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external mic port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Samsung WB800F
 Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651Samsung WB800F
General Information
Make Kodak Samsung
Model type Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 Samsung WB800F
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2014-01-07 2013-01-07
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 21 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest Possible resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 25 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-1560mm (65.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing range 3cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 920 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Features
Minimum shutter speed - 16 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 9.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 567 gr (1.25 lb) 218 gr (0.48 lb)
Dimensions 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer - Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage media - SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $419 $300