Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB800F
65 Imaging
45 Features
56 Overall
49
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Introduced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
The following is a extensive assessment of the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Kodak and Samsung. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and WB800F (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Astro Zoom AZ651 was introduced 13 months after the WB800F which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 scores versus the WB800F for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 & Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Samsung WB800F
Astro Zoom AZ651 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | January 2013 | Newer by 13 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
WB800F | Astro Zoom AZ651 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Samsung WB800F
Astro Zoom AZ651 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 features outer dimensions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") and a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and the WB800F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and WB800F is 65 and 92 respectively.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions merely by checking specifications. The picture underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and WB800F.
Plainly, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can count on the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to give more detail using its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more modern Astro Zoom AZ651 should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Kodak | Samsung |
Model type | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Samsung WB800F |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2014-01-07 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 16 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 9.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 567 gr (1.25 lb) | 218 gr (0.48 lb) |
Dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $419 | $300 |