Kodak S-1 vs Sony NEX-F3
88 Imaging
53 Features
61 Overall
56
![Kodak Pixpro S-1 front Kodak Pixpro S-1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-Pixpro-S-1/Kodak-S-1-front.jpg)
![Sony Alpha NEX-F3 front Sony Alpha NEX-F3 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Alpha-NEX-F3/Sony-NEX-F3-front.jpg)
86 Imaging
57 Features
60 Overall
58
Kodak S-1 vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 290g - 116 x 68 x 36mm
- Launched June 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
- Introduced August 2012
- Previous Model is Sony NEX-C3
- Later Model is Sony NEX-3N
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Kodak S-1 vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Kodak S-1 versus Sony NEX-F3, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by rivals Kodak and Sony. The image resolution of the S-1 (16MP) and the NEX-F3 (16MP) is relatively comparable but the S-1 (Four Thirds) and NEX-F3 (APS-C) come with different sensor dimensions.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The S-1 was announced 23 months after the NEX-F3 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short overview of how the S-1 scores against the NEX-F3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Kodak S-1 vs Sony NEX-F3 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak Pixpro S-1 & Sony Alpha NEX-F3. The whole galleries are available at Kodak S-1 Gallery & Sony NEX-F3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak S-1 over the Sony NEX-F3
S-1 | NEX-F3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2014 | ![]() | August 2012 | Newer by 23 months |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Kodak S-1
NEX-F3 | S-1 |
---|
Common features in the Kodak S-1 and Sony NEX-F3
S-1 | NEX-F3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Kodak S-1 vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak S-1 has got outside measurements of 116mm x 68mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.4") and a weight of 290 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Sony NEX-F3 has proportions of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).
Examine the Kodak S-1 versus Sony NEX-F3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the S-1 against the NEX-F3.
![Kodak S-1 vs Sony NEX-F3 size comparison Kodak S-1 vs Sony NEX-F3 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-Pixpro-S-1-vs-Sony-Alpha-NEX-F3-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S-1 and NEX-F3 is 88 and 86 respectively.
![Kodak S-1 vs Sony NEX-F3 top view buttons comparison Kodak S-1 vs Sony NEX-F3 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-Pixpro-S-1-vs-Sony-Alpha-NEX-F3-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak S-1 vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by seeing specifications. The picture here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the S-1 and NEX-F3.
To sum up, both cameras enjoy the same exact megapixel count albeit different sensor dimensions. The S-1 contains the smaller sensor which is going to make getting shallower depth of field trickier. The more recent S-1 should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
![Kodak S-1 vs Sony NEX-F3 sensor size comparison Kodak S-1 vs Sony NEX-F3 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-Pixpro-S-1-vs-Sony-Alpha-NEX-F3-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak S-1 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak S-1 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak S-1 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-Pixpro-S-1-vs-Sony-Alpha-NEX-F3-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Kodak S-1 vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications
Kodak Pixpro S-1 | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Kodak | Sony |
Model | Kodak Pixpro S-1 | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2014-06-24 | 2012-08-16 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4640 x 3480 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 16000 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Available lenses | 107 | 121 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash options | Auto, Red-Eye Reduction, Fill Flash, Flash Off, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain Sync, Slow Sync+ Red-Eye Reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 290g (0.64 lbs) | 314g (0.69 lbs) |
Dimensions | 116 x 68 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.4") | 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 images | 470 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LB-070 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $250 | $470 |