Clicky

Konica Minolta 5D vs Olympus E-3

Portability
64
Imaging
44
Features
38
Overall
41
Konica Minolta Maxxum 5D front
 
Olympus E-3 front
Portability
56
Imaging
45
Features
56
Overall
49

Konica Minolta 5D vs Olympus E-3 Key Specs

Konica Minolta 5D
(Full Review)
  • 6MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 670g - 131 x 93 x 67mm
  • Revealed July 2005
  • Also referred to as Dynax 5D
  • Successor is Sony A100
Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
  • Revealed February 2008
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-1
  • Later Model is Olympus E-5
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Konica Minolta 5D vs Olympus E-3 Overview

Below is a in depth review of the Konica Minolta 5D vs Olympus E-3, both Advanced DSLR cameras by manufacturers Konica and Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the Minolta 5D (6MP) and E-3 (10MP) and the Minolta 5D (APS-C) and E-3 (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor sizes.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The Minolta 5D was introduced 3 years before the E-3 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Mid-size SLR).

Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the Minolta 5D scores against the E-3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Konica Minolta 5D over the Olympus E-3

 Minolta 5D E-3 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Konica Minolta 5D

 E-3 Minolta 5D 
RevealedFebruary 2008July 2005More recent by 31 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution230k115kCrisper display (+115k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Konica Minolta 5D and Olympus E-3

 Minolta 5D E-3 
Manual focus More accurate focus
Display size2.5"2.5"Same display dimensions
Touch display Missing Touch display

Konica Minolta 5D vs Olympus E-3 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Konica Minolta 5D offers outside measurements of 131mm x 93mm x 67mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Olympus E-3 has dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs).

See the Konica Minolta 5D vs Olympus E-3 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the Minolta 5D vs the E-3.

Konica Minolta 5D vs Olympus E-3 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Minolta 5D and E-3 is 64 and 56 respectively.

Konica Minolta 5D vs Olympus E-3 top view buttons comparison

Konica Minolta 5D vs Olympus E-3 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements merely by going through specifications. The visual below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Minolta 5D and E-3.

To sum up, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Minolta 5D with its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-3 will provide greater detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The older Minolta 5D will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Konica Minolta 5D vs Olympus E-3 sensor size comparison

Konica Minolta 5D vs Olympus E-3 Screen and ViewFinder

Konica Minolta 5D vs Olympus E-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Konica Minolta 5D
Portrait photography with Olympus E-3
50
has manual focus
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
no liveview
low MP (6MP)
57
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
low megapixels (10MP)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Konica Minolta 5D Street photography features
Olympus E-3 Street photography features
64
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
no moving screen
70
screen can move to multiple angles
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
environment proofing
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Konica Minolta 5D as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-3 as a Sports photography camera
47
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
sensor has phase detect AF
no liveview
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
low MP (6MP)
58
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
environment proofing
sensor has phase detect auto focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
low megapixels (10MP)
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Konica Minolta 5D Travel photography info
Olympus E-3 Travel photography info
44
flash built-in
missing Timelapse recording
low MP (6 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
55
environment proofing
built-in flash
screen is selfie friendly
missing Timelapse recording
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Konica Minolta 5D Landscape photography features
Olympus E-3 Landscape photography features
51
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
screen is small (2.5")
no liveview
low MP (6MP)
missing Timelapse recording
56
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
environment proofing
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inches)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
missing Timelapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Konica Minolta 5D Vlogging info
Olympus E-3 Vlogging info
9
lack of video recording
18
no video recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Konica Minolta 5D vs Olympus E-3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Konica Minolta 5D and Olympus E-3
 Konica Minolta Maxxum 5DOlympus E-3
General Information
Brand Name Konica Olympus
Model Konica Minolta Maxxum 5D Olympus E-3
Also called as Dynax 5D -
Type Advanced DSLR Advanced DSLR
Revealed 2005-07-15 2008-02-20
Body design Mid-size SLR Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.7mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 369.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 6 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Maximum resolution 3008 x 2000 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 9 11
Lens
Lens mounting type Sony/Minolta Alpha Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 143 45
Focal length multiplier 1.5 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display size 2.5 inch 2.5 inch
Display resolution 115 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage 95% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.55x 0.58x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/8000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 13.00 m
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Off Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/160 secs 1/250 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Maximum video resolution None None
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 670 gr (1.48 pounds) 890 gr (1.96 pounds)
Physical dimensions 131 x 93 x 67mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 2.6") 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 58 56
DXO Color Depth score 21.3 21.6
DXO Dynamic range score 11.1 10.5
DXO Low light score 605 571
Other
Battery model NP-400 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $1,100 $670