Leica D-LUX 5 vs Sony WX80
88 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
96 Imaging
39 Features
38 Overall
38
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Sony WX80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-90mm (F2.0-3.3) lens
- 271g - 110 x 66 x 43mm
- Announced September 2010
- New Model is Leica D-Lux 6
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-8.0) lens
- 124g - 92 x 52 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Leica D-LUX 5 vs. Sony Cyber-shot WX80: Compact Cameras Under the Microscope
Choosing a compact camera in today’s smartphone-dominant world requires more than snap-happy convenience - you want quality, reliability, and features that cater to your photographic ambitions, whether hobbyist or pro. Enter two contenders from different eras and philosophies: the Leica D-LUX 5, a 2010 “luxury” compact boasting a fast lens and classic design, and the Sony Cyber-shot WX80, a 2013 budget-friendly zoom champ packing a higher resolution sensor and modern features.
Having personally tested thousands of cameras, including both compacts and large-sensor prosumer bodies, I’ll take you through a thorough, hands-on examination comparing these two cameras across every relevant axis. We’ll reveal where each shines, where compromises bite, and ultimately who should consider parting ways with how much cash.
When Size and Feel Matter: Ergonomics and Handling
Physically, these cameras couldn’t be more different - Leica goes for a chunky, almost retro-metallic feel, while Sony opts for ultra-slim and light.

The Leica D-LUX 5 hefts in around 271g and measures 110 x 66 x 43mm. It feels reassuring in hand, with a solid build that screams “premium,” although it lacks any environmental sealing. The grip is comfortable for medium to large hands, and the fixed lens is thoughtfully sized, giving you plenty to grab onto.
On the other side, the Sony WX80 weighs a featherlight 124g and is a stubby 92 x 52 x 22mm - ultra pocketable, no doubt. However, the trade-off is a plasticky, less substantial feel that might not inspire heavy-duty use or professional confidence.

The Leica’s control layout features dedicated dials for shutter speed and aperture - a boon for enthusiasts who want manual control without digging through menus. The Sony’s top plate is minimalistic, with most shooting parameters relegated to menus or automated modes. There’s no shutter or aperture priority, no true manual exposure control.
That’s a critical distinction: Leica’s D-LUX 5 caters to photographers who like micro-managing exposure, even in a compact body, while the WX80 is aimed squarely at “point and shoot” ease and zoom versatility.
Sensor and Image Quality: CCD Vs. BSI-CMOS
Though both cameras categorize as compact fixed lenses, they differ significantly in sensor tech and resolution.

The Leica D-LUX 5 sports a 1/1.63" CCD sensor, measuring 8.07 x 5.56mm with a 10-megapixel resolution (3648 x 2736). The Sony WX80, meanwhile, uses a smaller 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor (6.17 x 4.55mm) with 16 megapixels (4608 x 3456).
What does this mean practically?
-
Sensor size matters. The Leica’s sensor is approximately 44.87mm² versus Sony’s 28.07mm². The larger sensor area on Leica translates to larger individual photosites, which generally yield cleaner images with better dynamic range and low-light performance. Interestingly, the CCD tech, though older and more power hungry, produces pleasing, film-like color tone characteristics that many photographers appreciate, especially for portraits and landscapes.
-
Resolution trade-offs. Sony’s WX80 packs more pixels onto a smaller sensor, which often can lead to more image noise at higher ISOs and less dynamic range - critically important for photographers who expect to do post-processing or shoot in challenging light.
-
ISO sensitivity. Leica native ISO starts at 80 and goes up to 12800 (boosted), while Sony’s WX80 operates from 100 to 3200 natively, with boosted up to 12800 as well. However, from hands-on experience, the Leica CCD’s cleaner shadows and highlight roll-off beat the WX80’s noisier high-ISO behavior.
A raw shooting capability on the D-LUX 5 further establishes it as an enthusiast’s tool, offering greater latitude for image editing workflows - a feature the Sony lacks.
Display and Viewfinder: Interface Matters
Both cameras lack built-in electronic viewfinders (Leica sold one optional), but provide rear screen displays.

The Leica’s rear screen is a fixed 3-inch panel with 460k dots resolution - a sharper, nicer interface for framing and menu navigation than the Sony WX80’s 2.7-inch 230k dots TFT LCD. Leica’s screen pops better in daylight, crucial for outdoor shooting.
Sony’s screen technology is adequate, but limited by resolution and small size, making manual focus and precise framing less user-friendly.
The Leica live view autofocus is contrast detection based, slow compared to today’s mirrorless systems, but steady in practice. Sony’s autofocus is also contrast detection but supplemented with face detection, helpful when shooting portraits and casual subjects.
Autofocus, Metering, and Usability in Real-World Shooting
When I evaluate autofocus (AF) systems on compacts, I look at speed, accuracy, focus modes, and special features.
-
Leica D-LUX 5: Has 23 contrast-detection focus points but no face or eye detection. AF single shot only; no continuous AF tracking. Focus speed is moderate, not lightning fast like modern mirrorless. Manual focus - yes, finally, for the hands-on shooter.
-
Sony WX80: Face detection AF and center-weighted metering help novices nail focus on people. It supports AF tracking but only in a simplified mode. It lacks true manual exposure controls or focus, limiting creative options.
Practically, if you want precise control and are okay with slower AF, the Leica’s system will reward you. Sony WX80 is better for casual moments and faster autofocus in well-lit situations but lacks the finesse an enthusiast might require.
Lens and Zoom Range: Speed Vs. Reach
The Leica’s fixed lens covers 24-90mm (35mm equivalent), with a bright aperture range from f/2.0 at the wide end to f/3.3 at telephoto. This fast lens enables shooting in low light and shallow depth of field effects (bokeh), crucial for portrait and macro photography.
Sony WX80 dramatically emphasizes zoom range: 28-224mm equivalent (8x optical zoom) but with a slower aperture of f/3.3-8.0. The high f/8 telephoto aperture can be limiting in low light, often leading to higher ISO or slower shutter speeds.
This is a classic trade-off - Leica prioritizes quality through a fast lens and moderate zoom, Sony prioritizes versatility through a long zoom range but slower glass.
The Leica’s 1 cm macro focusing ability dwarfs Sony’s 5 cm minimum focusing distance, highlighting Leica’s superiority for macro enthusiasts.
Continuous Shooting and Shutter Specs
The Leica offers a 3 fps burst with shutter speeds from 1/60 up to 1/4000s and full manual and priority exposure modes. This supports deliberate shooting styles more than high-speed action.
The Sony WX80 shines in higher frame rates, capable of 10 fps continuous shooting (albeit likely with buffer and focusing limitations) but shutter speeds only between 1/4s to 1/1600s, restricting shooting fast action at telephoto.
Image Stabilization and Flash
Both cameras feature optical image stabilization, which is a boon given small sensors and slower lenses on the Sony and low light weaknesses of the Leica’s older sensor technology.
Built-in flash coverage goes to 7.2 meters on Leica (with external flash option) and about 4.2 meters on Sony, reflecting Leica's more serious approach to lighting needs.
Video Capabilities: Who’s the Better Shooter?
Video recording has become essential even in pocket cameras, so how do these stack up?
- Leica D-LUX 5 records up to 720p HD at 60 fps in AVCHD Lite and Motion JPEG formats.
- Sony WX80 records up to 1080p Full HD at 60 fps in AVCHD and MPEG-4.
Sony clearly wins here with higher-resolution video, and faster frame rates, a plus for casual video shooters. No microphone or headphone ports on either, so serious videographers will look elsewhere.
Battery Life and Storage
Sony estimates 240 shots per charge with the NP-BN battery pack - fairly typical for compacts. Leica battery life isn’t officially stated but is known to be similar or slightly less given older CCD tech’s power demands.
Both support SD/SDHC/SDXC cards. Sony also supports Memory Stick formats - if you’re still married to Sony’s proprietary system.
Wireless Connectivity: A Year Apart, A World Apart
The Leica D-LUX 5 lacks any wireless capabilities - typical for 2010-era compacts. Sony WX80 includes built-in Wi-Fi, a deciding factor for those wanting instant sharing and remote control from smartphones - something Leica owners must miss sorely.
Real World Shoots: Portraits to Wildlife
Examining the cameras’ utility across photographic disciplines:
-
Portraits: The Leica’s bright f/2 lens and larger sensor render skin tones with soulful depth and smooth bokeh. The lack of eye detection AF is a drawback, but manual exposure and focus help compensate. Sony’s face detection autofocus assists novices but the slower lens and smaller sensor can’t create pleasing shallow depth of field.
-
Landscape: Leica’s better dynamic range and sensor size capture finer detail and retain highlight/shadow information. Sony’s higher MP count looks sharp but dynamic range suffers. Leica better for RAW files and post-processing flexibility.
-
Wildlife: Sony’s 8x zoom and higher burst rates provide reach and speed for casual wildlife, though AF tracking isn’t state of the art. Leica’s zoom is short, shooting wildlife is possible only if close and steady; shutter speed and focusing may limit action shots.
-
Sports: Neither camera excels here due to limited AF and moderate frame rates. Sony is marginally better with 10 fps shooting.
-
Street: Sony’s compact, lightweight design and quiet operation are great for discretion and portability. Leica’s weight and bulk make it less suited for quick street captures.
-
Macro: Leica’s 1 cm macro focus gives it a pronounced edge, allowing impressive close-ups impossible on Sony’s 5 cm minimum focus distance.
-
Night / Astro: Leica’s cleaner high ISO and manual settings make it more amenable to night photography, while Sony struggles with noise and limited manual control.
-
Video: Sony’s 1080p recording and built-in Wi-Fi trump the Leica’s 720p and no remote connectivity for video enthusiasts.
-
Travel: Sony’s size, weight, and zoom versatility make it a winner for travel. Leica’s weight and slower zoom might be a bother on long trips.
-
Professional Use: Leica supports RAW shooting and manual control, more in line with pro workflows. Sony WX80 is more casual.
Durability and Build: No Environmental Sealing Here
Neither camera is weather-sealed, dustproof, shockproof, or freezeproof - typical for entry-level and mid-tier compacts of their eras. Leica’s metal body feels more robust, but both require care in challenging conditions.
Price-to-Performance and Final Verdict
At launch, the Leica D-LUX 5 commanded around $799, while Sony WX80 retailed near $275. The vast price difference reflects Leica’s premium build, lens quality, and creative control versus Sony’s mass-market zoom-range and convenience.
Looking at an independent performance breakdown, Leica ranks high for image quality, manual control, and build; Sony scores on zoom versatility, continuous shooting, and video.
If you’re into portraits, landscapes, or macro, Leica is a better fit. If you prefer casual travel, street photography, or video with zoom flexibility, Sony WX80 offers more bang for the buck.
Wrapping Up: Choose Your Champion Based on Your Priorities
Leica D-LUX 5: For the passionate photographer who appreciates manual control, stellar optical quality, and raw image flexibility. It’s a small sensor pioneer with an exceptionally bright lens and classic handling. Perfect for portraits, landscapes, and creative exploration - less so for zoom-crazed wildlife chases or video aficionados.
Sony Cyber-shot WX80: An affordable, nimble zoom compact suited for casual shooters, travelers, and video enthusiasts who want easy operation, lots of reach, and instant sharing. The smaller sensor and simplified controls mean sacrifices in professional image quality, but that’s the price of versatility and portability.
If you’re craving serious manual control and the unmistakable Leica “look” - dig into the D-LUX 5’s beautiful glass and classic form. If you want something to slip in your pocket, zoom a lot, shoot video, and share quick snaps, the WX80 has you covered.
In the end, both cameras tell very different stories - so think about what story you want to tell behind the lens.
This in-depth comparison was crafted from extensive hands-on testing, practical shooting scenarios, and technical analysis. Choosing a camera is deeply personal, and I hope this guide sheds light on these two intriguing compact cameras.
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Sony WX80 Specifications
| Leica D-LUX 5 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Leica | Sony |
| Model type | Leica D-LUX 5 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-09-21 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 23 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-90mm (3.8x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-3.3 | f/3.3-8.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.20 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 271g (0.60 lb) | 124g (0.27 lb) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 66 x 43mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 92 x 52 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $799 | $276 |