Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH3
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
94 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 165g - 98 x 55 x 24mm
- Announced January 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FS11
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH3 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic FH3, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the FH3 (14MP) is very well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and FH3 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe XZ-2 iHS was announced 2 years after the FH3 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summation of how the XZ-2 iHS scores vs the FH3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH3 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FH3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic FH3
XZ-2 iHS | FH3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | January 2010 | Newer by 36 months | |
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH3 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
FH3 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FH3
XZ-2 iHS | FH3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with exterior dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Panasonic FH3 has proportions of 98mm x 55mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic FH3 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the FH3.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and FH3 is 85 and 94 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading through a spec sheet. The picture here should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and FH3.
As you can see, the two cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS with its larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Panasonic FH3 will give extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images much more aggressively. The more modern XZ-2 iHS will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH3 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FS11 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-6.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 6.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 165 gr (0.36 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 98 x 55 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $450 | $160 |