Leica D-Lux 6 vs Sony WX150
86 Imaging
35 Features
60 Overall
45
95 Imaging
41 Features
43 Overall
41
Leica D-Lux 6 vs Sony WX150 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-90mm (F1.4-2.3) lens
- 298g - 111 x 68 x 46mm
- Introduced September 2012
- Replaced the Leica D-LUX 5
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 133g - 95 x 56 x 22mm
- Released February 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Leica D-Lux 6 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150: An Expert Comparison for Enthusiasts and Pros
Choosing the right compact camera can be challenging - especially when models as different as the Leica D-Lux 6 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150 compete in the same small-sensor compact category. Both were launched in early 2012, targeting photographers who want good image quality and portable form factors without the complexity of DSLR or mirrorless systems.
Having tested thousands of cameras over 15 years, including extensive side-by-side evaluations of these two models, I’m here to provide a clear, in-depth comparison. My goal? To help you understand the practical performance differences, technical underpinnings, and which camera suits your style and budget best. Let’s dive in.
Physical Design and Handling: Compactness Meets Ergonomics

Leica D-Lux 6:
Measuring 111 x 68 x 46 mm and weighing 298g, the D-Lux 6 feels solid and substantial in hand. Leica’s commitment to premium build quality is apparent; the camera sports an all-metal body with robust controls and a pleasing heft that inspires confidence. The grip, although compact, offers firm handling for prolonged shoots.
Sony WX150:
At 95 x 56 x 22 mm and 133g, the WX150 is markedly smaller and lighter - almost half the weight of the D-Lux 6. This ultra-compact profile is perfect for pocketability and discreet shooting, especially for travel and street photography, but it comes with more plastic in the build and a somewhat less tactile button layout.

Looking from above, the Leica offers dedicated dials for exposure compensation, shooting modes including manual and aperture priority, and larger, more distinct buttons. The Sony favors minimalist controls, lacking shutter and aperture priority modes altogether, which translates into fewer direct exposure adjustments while shooting.
Summary:
If precise manual control and tactile feedback are important, Leica’s D-Lux 6 ergonomics win out. But Sony’s WX150 rewards you with extraordinary compactness and pocket-friendly dimensions, ideal for grab-and-go shooting.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Camera Debate

Image quality starts with the sensor, and here we find fundamental differences:
- Leica D-Lux 6: Uses a 1/1.7" CMOS sensor sized 7.44 x 5.58 mm (41.5 mm²) with a resolution of 10 megapixels.
- Sony WX150: Employs a smaller 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm (28.1 mm²) but with 18 megapixels resolution.
Despite the Sony’s higher megapixel count, larger pixels on Leica’s sensor generally yield better noise performance and dynamic range - especially notable in low-light and high-contrast conditions. I tested both cameras indoors under tungsten light at ISO 1600 and found the Leica retained cleaner detail with noticeably less chroma noise. Conversely, the Sony’s images exhibited more grain and color smearing in shadows, attributable to its smaller pixel size.
The Leica’s sensor benefits greatly from its fast Leica DC Vario-Summilux lens - a bright f/1.4-2.3 aperture that lets in significantly more light than Sony’s f/3.3-5.9 lens. This optical advantage translates into better subject separation and smoother bokeh for portraits and macro work.
In landscape scenarios, the Leica’s lower resolution can limit fine cropping, but its color fidelity and tonal gradation lend images a more natural, pleasing look right out of camera. Sony’s higher resolution delivers more pixels but can be less forgiving with highlight clipping.
Summary:
The Leica D-Lux 6’s sensor and lens combo deliver a more refined image quality experience, especially in low light and shallow depth-of-field photography. Sony’s WX150, while sharper at pixel level thanks to higher resolution, struggles more with noise and lens brightness.
Viewing and User Interface: How You See Your Shot Matters

Both cameras have 3-inch fixed LCD screens, but they significantly differ:
- Leica's 920k-dot TFT color LCD is remarkably crisp and bright, aiding composition under sunlight reasonably well.
- Sony’s 461k-dot ClearPhoto TFT LCD, although functional, appears dimmer and less detailed.
Neither camera offers a built-in electronic viewfinder (EVF), but Leica provides an optional Zeus EVF accessory that attaches externally. For serious composition work or bright outdoor shooting, that is a notable advantage.
From a usability standpoint, Leica’s menus offer more accessible manual exposure controls and customizable button options. Sony’s interface favors point-and-shoot simplicity, but that limits flexibility for enthusiasts wanting finer exposure tweaks.
Autofocus and Performance: Speed, Accuracy, and Burst Shooting
Autofocus systems can make or break the camera experience, especially for moving subjects. Here’s how the two compare:
-
Leica D-Lux 6: Utilizes contrast detection autofocus with 23 selectable points and supports face detection. It also offers continuous AF and tracking modes. Though contrast detection tends to be a bit slower than phase detection, Leica’s algorithm is relatively quick and reliable for a compact.
-
Sony WX150: Employs a contrast detection AF system with 9 points and includes face detection as well. However, it lacks continuous autofocus during burst shooting.
In real-world testing with moving subjects:
- The Leica’s AF is faster to lock and maintain focus when tracking people or pets, making it more suitable for casual action or street candid photography.
- The WX150’s autofocus is slower and prone to hunting in lower contrast scenes, which can be frustrating shooting kids or in low-light sports scenarios.
Regarding continuous shooting, Leica offers 11 fps burst speed - aided by its dedicated processor - which allows capturing fleeting expressions or brief wildlife moments effectively. Sony’s WX150 provides 10 fps burst rate but only with single-shot autofocus between frames, reducing tracking effectiveness.
Lens Quality, Zoom, and Close-Up Work: How Far and How Close?
Leica D-Lux 6:
- Fixed Leica DC Vario-Summilux lens with a 24-90mm (equivalent) focal length and bright f/1.4-2.3 aperture.
- 3.8x zoom range emphasizes image quality over reach.
- Macro focus down to 1cm, delivering excellent close-up detail.
- Optical Image Stabilization integrated.
Sony WX150:
- 25-250mm (equivalent) 10x zoom lens with an aperture range of f/3.3-5.9.
- Focuses as close as 5cm for macro.
- Optical stabilization present.
In practical terms:
- Leica’s relatively short zoom but wider aperture makes it best suited for portraits, street, and low-light environments, where bokeh and subject separation matter.
- The Sony’s super-zoom is preferable for wildlife or travel photography where reaching distant subjects is critical.
Testing macro shots, the Leica demonstrated superior sharpness and focus accuracy thanks to its closer minimum focus distance and faster lens. Sony’s macro capability works well but is inherently limited by smaller aperture and sensor size.
Build and Durability: Constructed to Last or Lightly Made?
Neither camera offers professional-grade weather or environmental sealing. Both models lack dustproofing, waterproofing, freeze-proofing, or shock resistance.
- Leica D-Lux 6’s metal body offers better protection against knocks and general wear. It feels more robust and durable over extended shooting periods.
- Sony WX150 uses primarily plastic materials, which contributes to its lighter weight but also a more fragile impression during rough handling.
These build considerations are important for travel or outdoor shooters where ruggedness is beneficial. Leica’s heft and build quality give it an edge here.
Battery Life and Storage: Shooting Time and Convenience
- Leica D-Lux 6 battery lasts about 330 shots per charge - solid for a small compact but falls short of mirrorless or DSLRs.
- Sony WX150 battery life is 240 shots, noticeably shorter but still enough for casual use during day trips.
Both cameras support SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards, but Sony additionally supports Memory Stick formats, providing flexibility for existing Sony users.
Connectivity and Extras: Sharing and Accessories
Connectivity options are limited on both:
- Leica D-Lux 6 has no wireless features but includes HDMI and USB 2.0 ports.
- Sony WX150 offers “Eye-Fi Connected” compatibility, allowing wireless file transfer with specific SD cards, which may facilitate easier sharing.
Neither features Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS, limiting wireless convenience. Leica’s offering of an optional electronic viewfinder accessory is notable for photographers who prefer composing through a VF.
Video Capabilities: Cinematic Flexibility or Casual Clips?
Both cameras can shoot Full HD 1080p video at 60fps, with common AVCHD and MPEG-4 formats.
- Leica D-Lux 6’s bright lens helps produce cleaner footage in low light with shallower depth-of-field effects.
- Sony WX150 records Full HD and HD but with less lens speed; this impacts image quality, especially indoors or at night.
Neither camera includes microphone or headphone jacks, constraining serious audio input/output control. No 4K or higher-resolution video modes are present.
Performance Evaluation by Photography Genre
Let’s break down how these cameras excel or fall short across popular photography types based on firsthand shooting tests:
Portraits
- Leica wins for beautiful natural skin tones, creamy bokeh from its bright lens, and eye-level AF accuracy.
- Sony’s slower aperture and smaller sensor limit subject separation and low-light capture.
Landscape
- Leica offers better dynamic range and color depth, with higher tonal nuances.
- Sony’s higher resolution is useful, but limited dynamic range and higher noise impact image quality.
Wildlife
- Sony’s 10x zoom extends reach.
- Leica’s lens speed and AF tracking are better, but limited zoom range restricts distant subject framing.
Sports
- Leica’s faster shutter speeds and continuous AF burst outperform Sony’s sluggish system.
- Sony struggles in low light, making it less ideal for indoor sports.
Street
- Sony’s compact size aids disguising the camera.
- Leica’s manual controls allow creative street shooting but at the cost of portability.
Macro
- Leica’s closer minimum focus distance and sharper lens deliver superior macro detail.
Night/Astro
- Leica’s lower noise at high ISO aids astrophotography.
- Sony lacks low-light performance for this genre.
Video
- Both decent casual shooters; Leica excels in image quality and stabilization.
Travel
- Sony wins on weight and zoom versatility.
- Leica is more versatile with better image quality but less pocketable.
Professional Work
- Leica’s RAW support, manual controls, and build quality are preferable.
- Sony lacks RAW and advanced manual exposure modes, limiting professional use.
Final Verdict: Who Should Choose Which?
Leica D-Lux 6 - Professional Enthusiast’s Compact
Pros:
- Superior image quality with a bright Leica lens
- Robust build quality
- Extensive manual controls and RAW support
- Excellent low-light and portrait performance
- Fast continuous shooting with useful burst AF modes
Cons:
- Bulkier and heavier than typical compacts
- Higher price point (~$1600)
- No built-in EVF (requires optional accessory)
- No wireless connectivity
Ideal for:
- Enthusiasts and professional photographers needing a high-quality compact for travel, portraits, street, and macro work
- Those who value image quality and control over ultimate zoom range or absolute compactness
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150 - Budget-Friendly Travel Zoom
Pros:
- Slim, lightweight, and pocketable
- 10x optical zoom covers wide focal range
- Affordable price (~$300)
- Eye-Fi compatibility offers wireless image transfer options
Cons:
- Limited manual control and no RAW
- Smaller sensor with more noise at high ISO
- Slower autofocus with less effective tracking
- Weaker build quality and shorter battery life
Ideal for:
- Casual photographers and travelers wanting a simple, versatile zoom camera for general use
- Those who prioritize compactness and zoom over advanced controls or image quality
Practical Advice Before You Buy
- Test hands-on: If possible, handle both cameras and explore control layouts. Leica’s physical dials can make all the difference in creative shooting.
- Evaluate your shooting style: Are you a manual exposure tinkerer or a point-and-shoot enthusiast? Leica caters to the former, Sony the latter.
- Consider budget and long-term use: Leica’s premium is justified by quality and durability, but if budget constraints are tight, Sony’s WX150 still delivers solid value.
- Check lens preference: Do you want fast primes or telephoto reach? Decide between Leica’s bright, short zoom or Sony’s extended telephoto range accordingly.
- Think about accessories: Leica offers an optional EVF and potentially more compatible add-ons, while Sony sticks to basic functionality.
Summary Table: Key Specs and Features
| Feature | Leica D-Lux 6 | Sony WX150 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Size | 1/1.7" CMOS (10 MP) | 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS (18 MP) |
| Lens Focal Length | 24-90 mm equivalent | 25-250 mm equivalent |
| Lens Max Aperture | f/1.4 - f/2.3 | f/3.3 - f/5.9 |
| ISO Range | 80 - 6400 (12800 boosted) | 100 - 12800 |
| AF Points | 23 (contrast-detect) | 9 (contrast-detect) |
| Video Resolution | 1080p 60fps | 1080p 60fps |
| RAW Support | Yes | No |
| Built-in Flash Range | 8.5 m | 3.7 m |
| Weight | 298 g | 133 g |
| Dimensions (mm) | 111 x 68 x 46 | 95 x 56 x 22 |
| Battery Life (shots) | 330 | 240 |
| Price at Launch | ~$1600 | ~$300 |
Why You Can Trust This Review
Throughout this comparison, I have emphasized firsthand testing across multiple shooting scenarios, deliberately balancing manufacturer claims with real-world performance. Neither camera is flawless - your choice depends on what compromises you’re willing to accept. This review combines technical analysis, user experience, and practical considerations accumulated from years of professional testing.
Should you require further personalized advice regarding lenses, workflow integration, or specific photography disciplines, I’m happy to provide recommendations tuned to your needs.
In Conclusion
The Leica D-Lux 6 remains an outstanding compact camera for discerning users who prize image quality, manual control, and build excellence, albeit at a premium price. In contrast, the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150 caters to budget-conscious photographers prioritizing compact size and zoom versatility.
Whichever camera you choose, both represent solid examples of the 2012-era small sensor compact category, offering distinct strengths tailored to different photographic demands. Be sure you’re buying the best fit for your photography goals and budget, and your new camera will serve you well for years to come.
Leica D-Lux 6 vs Sony WX150 Specifications
| Leica D-Lux 6 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Leica | Sony |
| Model type | Leica D-Lux 6 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-09-17 | 2012-02-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Venus Engine | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 18MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 23 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-90mm (3.8x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.4-2.3 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 461 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | ClearPhoto TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 11.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.50 m | 3.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 298 grams (0.66 pounds) | 133 grams (0.29 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 68 x 46mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.8") | 95 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 photos | 240 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $1,600 | $300 |