Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL1s
79 Imaging
65 Features
28 Overall
50
86 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL1s Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Announced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Released November 2010
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL1
- Renewed by Olympus E-PL2
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL1s Overview
Lets look much closer at the Leica M-E Typ 220 versus Olympus E-PL1s, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and E-PL1s (12MP) and the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and E-PL1s (Four Thirds) use totally different sensor sizes.
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsAppThe M-E Typ 220 was revealed 23 months later than the E-PL1s which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a short summary of how the M-E Typ 220 grades vs the E-PL1s in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL1s Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M-E Typ 220 & Olympus PEN E-PL1s. The full galleries are available at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery & Olympus E-PL1s Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Olympus E-PL1s
M-E Typ 220 | E-PL1s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2012 | November 2010 | More recent by 23 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Leica M-E Typ 220
E-PL1s | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PL1s
M-E Typ 220 | E-PL1s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL1s Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Leica M-E Typ 220 has got outside dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL1s has proportions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs).
Look at the Leica M-E Typ 220 versus Olympus E-PL1s in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the M-E Typ 220 versus the E-PL1s.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the M-E Typ 220 and E-PL1s is 79 and 86 respectively.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL1s Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to envision the gap between sensor measurements purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual here will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the M-E Typ 220 and E-PL1s.
Clearly, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M-E Typ 220 with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will offer you more detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more recent M-E Typ 220 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL1s Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL1s Specifications
Leica M-E Typ 220 | Olympus PEN E-PL1s | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Olympus PEN E-PL1s |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2012-09-17 | 2010-11-16 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Truepic V |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 4032 x 3024 |
Maximum native ISO | 2500 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 59 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.00 m |
Flash settings | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 585 grams (1.29 lb) | 334 grams (0.74 lb) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 69 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 787 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $0 | $599 |