Clicky

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL2

Portability
79
Imaging
65
Features
28
Overall
50
Leica M-E Typ 220 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL2 front
Portability
85
Imaging
48
Features
47
Overall
47

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL2 Key Specs

Leica M-E Typ 220
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 2500
  • No Video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
  • Introduced September 2012
Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
  • Revealed February 2011
  • Old Model is Olympus E-PL1s
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-PL3
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL2 Overview

Let's take a more detailed look at the Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL2, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Leica and Olympus. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and E-PL2 (12MP) and the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and E-PL2 (Four Thirds) possess different sensor dimensions.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The M-E Typ 220 was announced 20 months after the E-PL2 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a short highlight of how the M-E Typ 220 scores versus the E-PL2 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Olympus E-PL2

 M-E Typ 220 E-PL2 
RevealedSeptember 2012February 2011More modern by 20 months

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Leica M-E Typ 220

 E-PL2 M-E Typ 220 
Screen dimension3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PL2

 M-E Typ 220 E-PL2 
Manual focus Very precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch screen Missing Touch screen

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL2 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Leica M-E Typ 220 provides physical measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") having a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL2 has proportions of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs).

See the Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL2 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the M-E Typ 220 and the E-PL2.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL2 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the M-E Typ 220 and E-PL2 is 79 and 85 respectively.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL2 top view buttons comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL2 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes just by researching technical specs. The picture below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the M-E Typ 220 and E-PL2.

As you can tell, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The M-E Typ 220 having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will provide you with greater detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more recent M-E Typ 220 provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL2 sensor size comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Portrait photography information
Olympus E-PL2 Portrait photography information
71
you can focus manually
MP count decent (18 megapixels)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
exports RAW formats
no liveview
60
you can focus manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
MP count low (12 megapixels)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Street photography highlights
Olympus E-PL2 Street photography highlights
65
sensor size is large (Full frame)
exports RAW formats
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
73
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
fixed screen
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-PL2 as a Sports photography camera
46
MP count decent (18MP)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
no liveview
low frames per second (2.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
lack of phase detect autofocus
45
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
bad battery pack (280 per charge)
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-PL2 as a Travel photography camera
57
MP count decent (18 megapixels)
lack of Timelapse recording
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
51
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse mode
bad battery pack (280 shots)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly display
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Landscape photography info
Olympus E-PL2 Landscape photography info
61
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Leica M mount)
MP count decent (18 megapixels)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
exports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
lack of Timelapse recording
61
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
MP count low (12 megapixels)
bad battery pack (280 per charge)
lack of Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Leica M-E Typ 220
Vlogging with Olympus E-PL2
9
can't record video
29
image stabilization (Sensor based)
features face detection autofocus
does not feature selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external mic port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PL2
 Leica M-E Typ 220Olympus PEN E-PL2
General Information
Make Leica Olympus
Model Leica M-E Typ 220 Olympus PEN E-PL2
Category Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2012-09-17 2011-02-11
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - Truepic V
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 36 x 24mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 864.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 18MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Peak resolution 5212 x 3472 4032 x 3024
Highest native ISO 2500 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points - 11
Lens
Lens mount Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 59 107
Crop factor 1 2.1
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5" 3"
Display resolution 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology TFT color LCD HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (rangefinder) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Min shutter speed 4 secs 60 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 2.0 frames per sec 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 10.00 m
Flash options Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180 secs 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 585 grams (1.29 lbs) 362 grams (0.80 lbs)
Dimensions 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 69 55
DXO Color Depth score 22.7 21.4
DXO Dynamic range score 11.7 10.2
DXO Low light score 787 573
Other
Battery life - 280 photos
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - BLS-5
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC
Storage slots Single Single
Price at release $0 $0