Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL2
79 Imaging
65 Features
28 Overall
50
85 Imaging
47 Features
47 Overall
47
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Introduced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL1s
- Refreshed by Olympus E-PL3
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL2 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL2, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Leica and Olympus. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and E-PL2 (12MP) and the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and E-PL2 (Four Thirds) possess different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe M-E Typ 220 was announced 20 months after the E-PL2 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a short highlight of how the M-E Typ 220 scores versus the E-PL2 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL2 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus PEN E-PL2. The whole galleries are provided at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery and Olympus E-PL2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Olympus E-PL2
M-E Typ 220 | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2012 | February 2011 | More modern by 20 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Leica M-E Typ 220
E-PL2 | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PL2
M-E Typ 220 | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Leica M-E Typ 220 provides physical measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") having a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL2 has proportions of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs).
See the Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL2 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the M-E Typ 220 and the E-PL2.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the M-E Typ 220 and E-PL2 is 79 and 85 respectively.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL2 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes just by researching technical specs. The picture below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the M-E Typ 220 and E-PL2.
As you can tell, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The M-E Typ 220 having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will provide you with greater detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more recent M-E Typ 220 provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL2 Specifications
Leica M-E Typ 220 | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Olympus PEN E-PL2 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2012-09-17 | 2011-02-11 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Truepic V |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 4032 x 3024 |
Highest native ISO | 2500 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 59 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.00 m |
Flash options | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 585 grams (1.29 lbs) | 362 grams (0.80 lbs) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 69 | 55 |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | 21.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | 10.2 |
DXO Low light score | 787 | 573 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 280 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $0 | $0 |