Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony FX3
79 Imaging
65 Features
28 Overall
50
62 Imaging
65 Features
92 Overall
75
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony FX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Announced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 102400 (Raise to 409600)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 716g - 130 x 78 x 85mm
- Released February 2021
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony FX3 Overview
The following is a in-depth assessment of the Leica M-E Typ 220 versus Sony FX3, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by competitors Leica and Sony. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and FX3 (12MP) but they come with the exact same sensor size (Full frame).
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe M-E Typ 220 was launched 9 years earlier than the FX3 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the M-E Typ 220 grades against the FX3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony FX3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M-E Typ 220 and Sony FX3. The complete galleries are available at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery and Sony FX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Sony FX3
M-E Typ 220 | FX3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony FX3 over the Leica M-E Typ 220
FX3 | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2021 | September 2012 | Newer by 102 months | |
Screen type | Fully articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimension | 3.00" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1440k | 230k | Crisper screen (+1210k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Sony FX3
M-E Typ 220 | FX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony FX3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Leica M-E Typ 220 has got external dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") along with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) and the Sony FX3 has dimensions of 130mm x 78mm x 85mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 716 grams (1.58 lbs).
Check the Leica M-E Typ 220 versus Sony FX3 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the M-E Typ 220 versus the FX3.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M-E Typ 220 and FX3 is 79 and 62 respectively.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony FX3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to see the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading through specifications. The pic underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the M-E Typ 220 and FX3.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Leica M-E Typ 220 to give you greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged M-E Typ 220 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony FX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony FX3 Specifications
Leica M-E Typ 220 | Sony FX3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Leica | Sony |
Model type | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Sony FX3 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2012-09-17 | 2021-02-23 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 847.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 4240 x 2832 |
Maximum native ISO | 2500 | 102400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 409600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 759 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Leica M | Sony E |
Amount of lenses | 59 | 187 |
Crop factor | 1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully articulated |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3.00 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,440 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | None |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 120p / 280 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 100p / 280 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 200 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 50p / 200 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 140 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 140 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 100p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, XAVC S, XAVC HS, XAVC S-1, H.264, H.265 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 585 grams (1.29 lbs) | 716 grams (1.58 lbs) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 130 x 78 x 85mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 69 | 85 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | 24.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.7 | 13.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 787 | 3900 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 600 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | Dual SD/CFexpress Type A slots |
Card slots | 1 | Dual |
Cost at launch | $0 | $3,900 |