Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-820UZ
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65


69 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Launched October 2013
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
- 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
- Announced August 2012
- Replaced the Olympus SP-820UZ
- Renewed by Olympus SP-820UZ

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 versus Olympus SP-820UZ, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are offered by Olympus. The resolution of the E-M1 (16MP) and the SP-820UZ (14MP) is relatively comparable but the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and SP-820UZ (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizing.

The E-M1 was introduced 15 months later than the SP-820UZ which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-820UZ being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-M1 matches up versus the SP-820UZ for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 & Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 Gallery & Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Olympus SP-820UZ
E-M1 | SP-820UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2013 | ![]() | August 2012 | More recent by 15 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+577k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Olympus E-M1
SP-820UZ | E-M1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Olympus SP-820UZ
E-M1 | SP-820UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 offers external measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") along with a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Olympus SP-820UZ has proportions of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") and a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1 versus Olympus SP-820UZ in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 against the SP-820UZ.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 and SP-820UZ is 71 and 69 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements just by seeing specifications. The visual underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 and SP-820UZ.
Plainly, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1 will provide greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-10-28 | 2012-08-21 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePIC VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 22-896mm (40.7x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.4-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 15.00 m |
Flash modes | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/320 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 497 grams (1.10 lbs) | 485 grams (1.07 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 757 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $799 | $299 |