Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica M Typ 262
74 Imaging
69 Features
47 Overall
60
77 Imaging
72 Features
35 Overall
57
Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica M Typ 262 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Released September 2012
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Announced November 2015
- Other Name is Typ 262
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica M Typ 262 Overview
Here is a thorough comparison of the Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica M Typ 262, both Pro Mirrorless cameras and they are both created by Leica. The sensor resolution of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and the M Typ 262 (24MP) is relatively comparable and they come with the same exact sensor sizes (Full frame).
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe M Typ 240 was revealed 4 years earlier than the M Typ 262 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the M Typ 240 scores vs the M Typ 262 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica M Typ 262 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica M Typ 240 & Leica M Typ 262. The full galleries are provided at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery & Leica M Typ 262 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Leica M Typ 262
| M Typ 240 | M Typ 262 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Leica M Typ 240
| M Typ 262 | M Typ 240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | November 2015 |  | September 2012 | Fresher by 38 months |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 920k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Leica M Typ 262
| M Typ 240 | M Typ 262 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica M Typ 262 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Leica M Typ 240 offers external measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") along with a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) while the Leica M Typ 262 has measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") having a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs).
Look at the Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica M Typ 262 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the M Typ 240 and the M Typ 262.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the M Typ 240 and M Typ 262 is 74 and 77 respectively.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica M Typ 262 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing simply by going through technical specs. The visual underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the M Typ 240 and M Typ 262.
As you can tell, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same resolution so you can expect comparable quality of images although you will want to consider the age of the cameras into account. The older M Typ 240 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica M Typ 262 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica M Typ 262 Specifications
| Leica M Typ 240 | Leica M Typ 262 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Leica | Leica |
| Model | Leica M Typ 240 | Leica M Typ 262 |
| Otherwise known as | - | Typ 262 |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
| Released | 2012-09-17 | 2015-11-19 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Maestro |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Full frame | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
| Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 855.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 5952 x 3976 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW files | ||
| Min boosted ISO | - | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Leica M | Leica M |
| Total lenses | 59 | 59 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Optical (rangefinder) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 1% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.68x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | - |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 680g (1.50 pounds) | 600g (1.32 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 84 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 24.0 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 13.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 1860 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | BP-SCL2 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $5,479 | $5,069 |