Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 II
74 Imaging
69 Features
47 Overall
60


68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Introduced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
Here is a extended analysis of the Leica M Typ 240 versus Olympus E-M1 II, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by brands Leica and Olympus. The image resolution of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and the E-M1 II (20MP) is fairly comparable but the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) use totally different sensor measurements.

The M Typ 240 was released 5 years before the E-M1 II and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Leica M Typ 240 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a quick overview of how the M Typ 240 matches up versus the E-M1 II for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The complete galleries are provided at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery and Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Olympus E-M1 II
M Typ 240 | E-M1 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Leica M Typ 240
E-M1 II | M Typ 240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | ![]() | September 2012 | Fresher by 48 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper display (+117k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-M1 II
M Typ 240 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Leica M Typ 240 has outside dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") having a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 II has sizing of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
Examine the Leica M Typ 240 versus Olympus E-M1 II in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the M Typ 240 compared to the E-M1 II.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 240 and E-M1 II is 74 and 68 respectively.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing only by going through specs. The graphic underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the M Typ 240 and E-M1 II.
As you can plainly see, both cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The M Typ 240 featuring a larger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Leica M Typ 240 will produce extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older M Typ 240 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
Leica M Typ 240 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica M Typ 240 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2012-09-17 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 59 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 1 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 60.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MOV, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 680g (1.50 lbs) | 574g (1.27 lbs) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 84 | 80 |
DXO Color Depth score | 24.0 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.3 | 12.8 |
DXO Low light score | 1860 | 1312 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | 350 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLH-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Storage slots | 1 | Two |
Retail cost | $5,479 | $1,700 |