Clicky

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 II

Portability
74
Imaging
69
Features
47
Overall
60
Leica M Typ 240 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs

Leica M Typ 240
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
  • Introduced September 2012
Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Announced September 2016
  • Older Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview

Here is a extended analysis of the Leica M Typ 240 versus Olympus E-M1 II, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by brands Leica and Olympus. The image resolution of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and the E-M1 II (20MP) is fairly comparable but the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) use totally different sensor measurements.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The M Typ 240 was released 5 years before the E-M1 II and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Leica M Typ 240 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a quick overview of how the M Typ 240 matches up versus the E-M1 II for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

				

Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 M Typ 240 E-M1 II 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Leica M Typ 240

 E-M1 II M Typ 240 
AnnouncedSeptember 2016September 2012Fresher by 48 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1037k920kSharper display (+117k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-M1 II

 M Typ 240 E-M1 II 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurements

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Leica M Typ 240 has outside dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") having a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 II has sizing of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).

Examine the Leica M Typ 240 versus Olympus E-M1 II in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the M Typ 240 compared to the E-M1 II.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 II size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 240 and E-M1 II is 74 and 68 respectively.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 II top view buttons comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing only by going through specs. The graphic underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the M Typ 240 and E-M1 II.

As you can plainly see, both cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The M Typ 240 featuring a larger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Leica M Typ 240 will produce extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older M Typ 240 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 II sensor size comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Leica M Typ 240
Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1 II
81
you can focus manually
good megapixels (24 megapixels)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
75
focusing manually
good megapixels (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Street photography info
Olympus E-M1 II Street photography info
67
sensor size is big (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
weather proof
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
78
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
features focus by touch
environment sealing
lighter than average (574 grams)
good ISO range (25,600)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-M1 II as a Sports photography camera
55
good megapixels (24 megapixels)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
weather proof
max frames per second very slow (3.0 fps)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
has no phase detect auto focus
74
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
high max frames per second (60.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
environment sealing
supports phase detect autofocus
not so great battery power (350 per charge)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Travel photography factors
Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography factors
63
weather proof
good megapixels (24 megapixels)
lack of Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
72
lighter than average (574 grams)
environment sealing
features focus by touch
good megapixels (20MP)
screen is selfie friendly
not so great battery power (350 per charge)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Landscape photography information
Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography information
73
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Leica M mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
good megapixels (24MP)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
weather proof
no image stabilization
lack of Timelapse recording
76
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
no anti aliasing filter
good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
environment sealing
has dual storage slots
not so great battery power (350 CIPA)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Vlogging advice
Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging advice
26
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
lack of microphone support
79
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection autofocus
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 pxls)
comes with external microphone jack
lighter than average (574 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-M1 II
 Leica M Typ 240Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
General Information
Manufacturer Leica Olympus
Model Leica M Typ 240 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
Type Pro Mirrorless Pro Mirrorless
Introduced 2012-09-17 2016-09-19
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic VIII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 36 x 24mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 864.0mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 24MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Highest resolution 5952 x 3976 5184 x 3888
Highest native ISO 6400 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW format
Lowest boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points - 121
Lens
Lens mounting type Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 59 107
Focal length multiplier 1 2.1
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 920k dot 1,037k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (rangefinder) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage 1 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x 0.74x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/8000 seconds
Highest quiet shutter speed - 1/32000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per sec 60.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 9.10 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 seconds 1/250 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 4096x2160
Video file format Motion JPEG MOV, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 680g (1.50 lbs) 574g (1.27 lbs)
Dimensions 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 84 80
DXO Color Depth score 24.0 23.7
DXO Dynamic range score 13.3 12.8
DXO Low light score 1860 1312
Other
Battery life 500 shots 350 shots
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model - BLH-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots
Storage slots 1 Two
Retail cost $5,479 $1,700