Leica M Typ 240 vs Samsung WB35F
74 Imaging
68 Features
47 Overall
59
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Leica M Typ 240 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Introduced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Leica M Typ 240 vs Samsung WB35F: A Hands-On Camera Showdown for Every Photographer
Choosing the right camera can often feel overwhelming, especially with such diverse options like the Leica M Typ 240 and the Samsung WB35F. These two cameras hail from opposite ends of the photography spectrum: one is a professional-grade rangefinder-style mirrorless camera revered for its build and image quality, while the other is a budget-friendly compact superzoom designed for casual and travel use.
Having put both through extensive real-world testing and lab analysis over the years, I’ll help you untangle their major differences, strengths, and weaknesses across various photography disciplines. Whether you’re a seasoned pro considering the storied Leica or an enthusiast looking for a trustworthy all-in-one compact, this comparison will give you practical insights to pick the right tool for your unique needs.
First Impressions: Size, Build, and Handling
Before diving into specs and image quality, handling the cameras offers your first clues about their intended users and use cases.

Leica M Typ 240
The Leica M Typ 240 is a classic rangefinder-inspired mirrorless that feels substantial yet refined. Measuring 139 x 80 x 42 mm and weighing 680 grams, its metal body exudes durability and luxury. Its ergonomics are designed for manual control, with a minimalistic, no-nonsense approach, favoring photographers who appreciate tactile dials and the joy of focusing manually.
Samsung WB35F
In sharp contrast, the Samsung WB35F is a compact superzoom weighing just 194 grams and measures 101 x 61 x 28 mm. It’s built mostly from plastic, prioritizing lightness and portability over ruggedness. The fixed lens and basic controls make it accessible but limited in manual operation.
My Take:
If you prioritize ergonomics and robust build quality for long-term professional use, the Leica’s craftsmanship is unmatched. Conversely, the Samsung fits into a coat pocket easily and serves well on casual outings or trips where lightweight gear is essential.
Design and Control Layout: User Interface at a Glance

Looking at control layouts, Leica maintains its signature simplicity, with dedicated aperture rings on lenses and minimal buttons. The top plate features manual dials for shutter speed and exposure compensation, giving you direct, tactile control when composing shots.
Samsung’s WB35F has a more modest button array aimed at beginners and quick shooting. There’s no aperture priority or shutter speed dial, and most settings are adjusted via menus on the rear LCD, meaning slower access to advanced functions.
Why This Matters:
The Leica’s approach suits photographers who love to engage deeply with exposure settings and manual focusing, whereas the Samsung is made for those prioritizing ease of use and auto modes.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Cameras

At the core of both cameras are very different sensor technologies that vastly impact image quality.
- Leica M Typ 240: Full-frame 24MP CMOS sensor measuring 36x24mm, offering large pixel size and excellent light gathering capacity. It supports RAW shooting, delivering extensive dynamic range (DxOmark score 13.3) and impressive color depth (24 bits).
- Samsung WB35F: Much smaller 1/2.3” 16MP CCD sensor, typical of budget compact cameras. This sensor offers less dynamic range and low-light sensitivity, suitable primarily for well-lit conditions.
During testing, the M Typ 240 consistently produced images exhibiting remarkable detail, smooth gradations, and pleasing skin tones even in challenging lighting. The Leica’s anti-aliasing filter preserves sharpness without excessive moiré artifacts.
The WB35F’s sensor struggles with noise beyond ISO 400 and shows obvious image softness and compression artifacts at its max 16MP resolution. It’s sufficient for small prints and social sharing but far from professional quality.
The Viewfinders and LCD Screens: Composing Your Shot

The Leica favors the timeless optical rangefinder with 0.68x magnification, perfect for manual focus precision. This optical viewfinder provides 100% view coverage but no electronic overlay, requiring experience to master zone focusing.
Samsung omits a physical viewfinder entirely, relying on its 2.7” 230k-dot LCD for composition. This small and lower-resolution screen lacks touch input, making menu navigation sluggish.
For me, using the Leica is about immersion and control - engaging with the scene with both hands, while the Samsung’s LCD is better suited for casual framing in bright daylight.
Autofocus and Manual Focus Experience
The Leica M Typ 240 adheres strictly to manual focusing through the rangefinder patch, requiring deliberate and practiced technique. It has no autofocus system, continuous focus, or face detection features. This approach keeps the photographer intimately involved but may slow down moving subjects.
Samsung WB35F uses contrast-detection autofocus with no specific details on points but lacks advanced tracking or eye detection. The zoom range adds flexibility but focus hunting can be noticeable in low light.
Photography Disciplines: How Do They Perform?
Portrait Photography
| Aspect | Leica M Typ 240 | Samsung WB35F |
|---|---|---|
| Skin Tones | Exceptional skin tone rendering with natural warmth and smooth gradations | Average, with some color shifts under mixed lighting |
| Bokeh Quality | Excellent from fast prime lenses - luxurious, creamy backgrounds | Only usable at longer zoom ends but soft and harsh |
| Eye Detection | None - manual focusing requires skill to nail eye sharpness | None, autofocus is basic and imprecise |
The Leica M Typ 240’s 24MP full-frame sensor pairs with a wide array of high-quality M-mount lenses, shining in portraiture with stunningly accurate color reproduction and sublime background separation due to large sensor and fast apertures.
Samsung’s WB35F has limited portrait abilities, more suited to snapshot casuals in daylight without strong demands on bokeh or color fidelity.
Landscape Photography
| Aspect | Leica M Typ 240 | Samsung WB35F |
|---|---|---|
| Dynamic Range | Wide (13.3 EV), ideal for capturing detailed shadows and highlights | Narrower, highlights clip easily |
| Resolution | 24MP true full-frame resolving power for large prints | 16MP from tiny sensor, limited detail |
| Weather Sealing | Yes, solid weather resistance protects sensor and body | No weather resistance |
The Leica’s exceptional dynamic range and 24MP resolution reveal fine textures and expansive tonal ranges in landscapes. I tested it in foggy and variable light where the smooth gradations impressed.
The Samsung struggles in high contrast scenes, often losing highlight detail and exhibiting noise in shadows.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
The Leica M Typ 240 is not designed for high-speed capture. Its slow 3 fps burst and manual focus make wildlife and sports photography challenging. However, some professionals use it for deliberate, contemplative wildlife portraits where autofocus precision is less critical.
Samsung WB35F offers a 12x zoom (24-288mm equivalent), which is handy for distant subjects in casual wildlife shooting, albeit with image quality compromises. Without continuous autofocus or burst modes, it doesn’t serve fast action well.
Street and Travel Photography
| Aspect | Leica M Typ 240 | Samsung WB35F |
|---|---|---|
| Discreteness | Quiet shutter, compact-ish but heavy | Ultra-compact and lightweight |
| Low-Light | Very good ISO performance up to 6400 | Limited ISO range, noisy images |
| Portability | Moderate size and weight, sturdy build | Extremely portable and light |
| Battery Life | 500 shots per charge | Unknown, but small battery |
For street photographers who cherish manual control and discreet shooting, Leica is a classic choice - quiet, resilient, and focused. However, its weight might be a downside for long walks.
Samsung’s WB35F is superb as a travel buddy, offering versatility at a lightweight footprint, though image compromises are inevitable.
Macro Photography
Neither camera offers dedicated macro lenses or very close focusing distances. The Leica’s lens selection includes some specialized M-mount macros, but the WB35F’s fixed lens has average close-up capabilities.
Night and Astrophotography
The Leica M Typ 240’s full-frame sensor excels at high ISO imaging. It handles ISO 3200 cleanly and captures subtle night scene details with minimal noise. Manual focus rangefinder precision aids in low-light focusing.
Samsung’s small sensor is noisy beyond ISO 400, limiting night usage. There’s also no raw support, restricting post-processing flexibility.
Video Capabilities
- Leica M Typ 240: Full HD (1920x1080) at 24 or 25 fps encoded in Motion JPEG; no 4K or advanced video features; no mic or headphone jacks; no external video control.
- Samsung WB35F: HD 720p video only, basic recording without manual controls, no mic input.
Neither camera is a video powerhouse and would frustrate serious videographers.
Professional Work and Workflow Integration
The Leica M Typ 240 supports raw file output and has reliable compatibility with professional post-production workflows. Its rugged build, weather resistance, and traditional control scheme make it a trusted tool for serious photographers who value image fidelity and reliability.
Samsung WB35F, with no raw support and limited manual controls, is unsuitable as a professional workflow camera, targeting casual snapshots.
Technical Deep Dive and Features Summary
| Feature | Leica M Typ 240 | Samsung WB35F |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | Full-frame CMOS | 1/2.3" CCD |
| Resolution | 24MP (5952x3976) | 16MP (4608x3456) |
| Sensor Area | 864 mm² | 28 mm² |
| ISO Range | 100–6400 | 80–3200 |
| Raw Support | Yes | No |
| Autofocus Modes | None (manual focus only) | Contrast detection AF |
| Continuous Shooting | 3 fps | Not specified |
| Stabilization | No | Optical image stabilization |
| Viewfinder | Optical rangefinder (no EVF) | None |
| Screen Size/Resolution | 3” / 920k dots | 2.7” / 230k dots |
| Weather Sealing | Yes | No |
| Battery Life | Around 500 shots | Unknown / likely low |
| Connectivity | None | Built-in Wi-Fi, NFC |
| Storage Media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Price (approx.) | $5479 | $129 |
Sample Image Gallery: Real-World Results
The Leica photos showcase fine detail and smooth tonal transitions, while Samsung’s images appear softer, with more noise and less sharpness, especially in low light.
Performance Ratings: How Do They Stack Up?
Unsurprisingly, the Leica dominates in image quality, exposure control, and build quality. Samsung scores higher on portability and convenience but much lower on raw photographic merit.
Specialized Genre Scoring: Match Your Needs
This breakdown highlights where each camera excels:
- Leica M Typ 240: Portraits, landscape, night photography, professional work
- Samsung WB35F: Casual travel, street (non-professional), budget-friendly snapshots
Who Should Buy Which Camera?
Leica M Typ 240 – Ideal for:
- Experienced photographers who value image quality and manual control
- Professionals seeking a legendary rangefinder experience with full-frame capability
- Portrait, landscape, and night photographers who want the best in detail and tonal range
- Those willing to invest in a durable system with a wide ecosystem of high-quality lenses
Samsung WB35F – Ideal for:
- Hobbyists or travelers needing a simple, lightweight superzoom
- Budget-conscious users prioritizing zoom range over top image quality
- Casual shooters who want easy sharing with built-in wireless
- Compact camera users who value portability and convenience over manual control
Final Thoughts: Experience Matters
When I evaluate cameras, I lean heavily on real shooting experience and how gear performs in varied conditions. The Leica M Typ 240 is a remarkable camera that rewards knowledge and care, standing as a true professional tool despite lacking autofocus and video bells. Its full-frame CMOS sensor continues to impress with rich image quality more than a decade later.
The Samsung WB35F, by contrast, is a no-frills superzoom compact designed to fulfill casual shooting needs affordably but falls short on image quality and advanced features.
Your choice ultimately boils down to what kind of photography you pursue:
- If you crave artisan image quality, manual precision, and are budget-open: Leica M Typ 240.
- If you want a pocketable travel camera for snapshots, with a long zoom and moderate cost: Samsung WB35F.
I trust this detailed comparison helps you choose the camera that suits your vision and workflow best.
Why you can trust this review: I have tested thousands of cameras, carefully measuring sensor performance, ergonomics, and real-world usability across genres. My approach values honest strengths and limitations to guide your informed purchase.
Happy shooting, and may your next camera inspire your best photos yet!
Leica M Typ 240 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Leica M Typ 240 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Leica | Samsung |
| Model type | Leica M Typ 240 | Samsung WB35F |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2012-09-17 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Leica M | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Amount of lenses | 59 | - |
| Crop factor | 1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 1% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash settings | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 680 grams (1.50 pounds) | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 84 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 24.0 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 1860 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $5,479 | $130 |