Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic GF8
77 Imaging
72 Features
35 Overall
57
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8e12/b8e123edbad624b77bc200569372c45fa64c0b47" alt="Leica M Typ 262 front Leica M Typ 262 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27fce/27fced1b30df29f9c1d9c26f1646ff64695d521a" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8 front"
90 Imaging
54 Features
62 Overall
57
Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic GF8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Introduced November 2015
- Also Known as Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 266g - 107 x 65 x 33mm
- Launched February 2016
- Older Model is Panasonic GF7
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic GF8 Overview
Lets look closer at the Leica M Typ 262 and Panasonic GF8, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Panasonic. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and GF8 (16MP) and the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and GF8 (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The M Typ 262 was manufactured 2 months earlier than the GF8 and they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the M Typ 262 matches up against the GF8 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic GF8 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M Typ 262 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8. The entire galleries are available at Leica M Typ 262 Gallery & Panasonic GF8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Panasonic GF8
M Typ 262 | GF8 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF8 over the Leica M Typ 262
GF8 | M Typ 262 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 921k | Crisper display (+119k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Panasonic GF8
M Typ 262 | GF8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2015 | ![]() | February 2016 | Same age |
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic GF8 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Leica M Typ 262 features physical dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") with a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) and the Panasonic GF8 has sizing of 107mm x 65mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 266 grams (0.59 lbs).
Analyze the Leica M Typ 262 and Panasonic GF8 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the M Typ 262 vs the GF8.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00708/00708a9c67f39e81779c357c74fcd89d9ee991db" alt="Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic GF8 size comparison Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic GF8 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the M Typ 262 and GF8 is 77 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/485a0/485a06da61e2b2320c9fe9689eccf17034b24baa" alt="Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic GF8 top view buttons comparison Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic GF8 top view buttons comparison"
Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic GF8 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing just by going through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 262 and GF8.
Clearly, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The M Typ 262 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Leica M Typ 262 will provide extra detail due to its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cdc2c/cdc2c5ce270cde953089bd9adf0ff24674b93c91" alt="Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic GF8 sensor size comparison Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic GF8 sensor size comparison"
Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic GF8 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32ee5/32ee50f6ac9479f103d77672ac13e6b301eb0245" alt="Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic GF8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic GF8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic GF8 Specifications
Leica M Typ 262 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Panasonic |
Model type | Leica M Typ 262 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8 |
Also called as | Typ 262 | - |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2015-11-19 | 2016-02-15 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Maestro | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 855.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4592 x 3448 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 59 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 921 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | None |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/500s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 5.8 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.60 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, flash off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 50p, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
Maximum video resolution | - | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 600g (1.32 pounds) | 266g (0.59 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 107 x 65 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 230 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BP-SCL2 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3-shot/10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $5,069 | $549 |