Olympus E-420 vs Pentax WG-2
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax WG-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced June 2008
- Previous Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Introduced February 2012
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax WG-2 Overview
In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-420 versus Pentax WG-2, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Pentax. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and WG-2 (16MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and WG-2 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-420 was introduced 4 years earlier than the WG-2 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax WG-2 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-420 grades against the WG-2 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax WG-2 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-420 & Pentax Optio WG-2. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Pentax WG-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Pentax WG-2
E-420 | WG-2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Olympus E-420
WG-2 | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | June 2008 | Fresher by 44 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Pentax WG-2
E-420 | WG-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax WG-2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-420 has outer dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Pentax WG-2 has specifications of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-420 versus Pentax WG-2 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the E-420 against the WG-2.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-420 and WG-2 is 77 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax WG-2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading through technical specs. The photograph here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-420 and WG-2.
As you have seen, both cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-420 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Pentax WG-2 will give more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The older E-420 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax WG-2 Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Pentax Optio WG-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus E-420 | Pentax Optio WG-2 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2008-06-23 | 2012-02-07 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426 grams (0.94 lb) | 192 grams (0.42 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | 260 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $999 | $350 |