Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung NX2000
77 Imaging
71 Features
35 Overall
56
89 Imaging
62 Features
68 Overall
64
Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung NX2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Announced November 2015
- Other Name is Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 228g - 119 x 65 x 36mm
- Announced November 2013
- Old Model is Samsung NX1100
- Later Model is Samsung NX3000
Photography Glossary Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung NX2000: A Thorough Comparison From an Experienced Photographer’s Perspective
Choosing between cameras like the Leica M Typ 262 and Samsung NX2000 is a little like picking between two very different tools in your photography toolbox. Are you after the ultimate image quality, classic experience, and build of a professional rangefinder, or do you want an affordable, versatile mirrorless with modern conveniences? Having spent 15+ years testing cameras across genres and price points, I’ll bring you a detailed, hands-on comparison of these two cameras. Let’s break down their technology, performance, and usability to see which one delivers in the real world - not just on paper.
First Impressions: Size, Ergonomics, and Handling
When I first held these cameras side by side, the Leica M Typ 262 felt like a serious piece of precision machinery built for photographers who appreciate craft and manual control. The Samsung NX2000, conversely, is compact and light, great for everyday shooting when portability is a priority.

-
Leica M Typ 262: Weighs around 600g with dimensions of 139x80x42 mm. The rangefinder-style body is solid yet elegant, with a focus on simple, tactile dials and buttons. It’s unmistakably a “no-nonsense” tool designed for photographers who prefer manual focus and a classic interface.
-
Samsung NX2000: Significantly lighter at 228g and smaller at 119x65x36 mm. Its modern design with a larger 3.7-inch touchscreen adds a user-friendly flair that beginners or casual shooters will appreciate. The ergonomic grip, though modest, boosts comfort for street or travel photography.
If you value sleek, robust ergonomics and traditional handling, Leica leads here. If weight, compactness, and touchscreen operation are on your checklist, the NX2000 scores points.
Design Language and Controls: Vintage Charm vs. Modern Convenience
Moving to the control layout and top design gives you clues about who these cameras are for.

-
Leica M Typ 262: No touchscreen, no electronic viewfinder, and minimal buttons. The top plate features traditional shutter speed and ISO dials, emphasizing manual exposure with aperture priority available. The absence of autofocus means every shot demands deliberate focusing, rewarding patience and skill.
-
Samsung NX2000: Features touchscreen AF control, live view, and more automated exposure modes including shutter and aperture priority. Though lacking a viewfinder, the large LCD fills the role well. Its user interface is designed with casual shooters in mind, offering a smoother learning curve.
You can see that Leica’s design is a homage to analog photography, preserving rangefinder heritage. Samsung’s NX2000 embraces digital conveniences and touchscreen interaction, providing a different user experience altogether.
Sensor and Image Quality: Full Frame Precision vs. APS-C Efficiency
Here’s where things really get technical - and exciting.

-
Leica M Typ 262: Features a 24MP full-frame CMOS sensor (35.8 x 23.9 mm), noted for delivering excellent dynamic range, sharpness, and color depth. There’s an optical low-pass (anti-alias) filter which slightly decreases maximum sharpness but improves image moire handling.
-
Samsung NX2000: Sports a 20MP APS-C CMOS sensor (23.5 x 15.7 mm), smaller by sensor area but still capable, especially with its 1.5x crop factor. Although it cannot rival full-frame in low light or shallow depth of field, it balances decent resolution with lower cost.
While I haven’t tested Leica Typ 262 with DxO Mark myself due to the camera’s age and rarity, real-world use confirms its images shine with rich mid-tones and clean noise performance up to ISO 3200. Samsung’s NX2000 scores a DxO overall of 75, respectable for an entry-level APS-C sensor, but its color depth (23.4 bits) and dynamic range (12.3 EV) lag slightly behind the Leica.
For landscape photographers requiring maximum detail and shadow recovery, the Leica sensor is a clear winner. But for everyday snaps and casual photography, the Samsung sensor holds solid ground.
The Viewfinder and Screen Experience
The viewing experience is pivotal, and these two cameras take very different approaches.

-
Leica M Typ 262: Has no electronic viewfinder or live view, relying solely on an optical rangefinder with 0.68x magnification. The fixed 3-inch screen at 921k dots is non-touch and limited in functionality, meant primarily for image review.
-
Samsung NX2000: Lacks a built-in viewfinder but makes up with a large 3.7-inch touchscreen with 1.15 million dots resolution. The touchscreen enables tap-to-focus and menu navigation, making focusing and settings quick and intuitive, especially for beginners.
While purists will appreciate the Leica’s optical rangefinder for precise manual focus and a distraction-free shooting experience, most people will find the Samsung’s touchscreen handy for fast, casual shooting.
Autofocus, Speed, and Performance
If you shoot action, wildlife, or sports, autofocus performance becomes critical. Leica M Typ 262, being a manual focus camera, is a different beast compared to the autofocus Samsung NX2000.
-
Leica M Typ 262: No autofocus points or tracking - every shot depends on you nailing focus through rangefinder patch alignment. Continuous shooting maxes out at a modest 3 fps, enough for deliberate shooting rather than bursts.
-
Samsung NX2000: Features contrast-detection AF with 21 selectable focus points and face detection, including continuous AF and tracking modes. Burst shooting is up to 8 fps, more than double the Leica, making it better suited for capturing dynamic moments.
While Leica’s manual method harks back to classic photography and rewards skill, the NX2000’s AF system is more practical for fleeting wildlife or sports shooting, albeit limited compared to modern hybrid AF systems.
Build Quality, Weather Sealing, and Durability
Longevity and robustness are non-negotiable for many photographers who rely on gear in varied environments.
-
Leica M Typ 262: Beautifully crafted with metal chassis and premium materials. However, it lacks formal weather sealing, dustproofing, or freeze-proof certification. Still, the build quality feels legendary and will survive regular pro use if treated with care.
-
Samsung NX2000: Plastic-heavy construction reflecting its entry-level positioning. No weather sealing or rugged features. This camera will need more tender loving care if shooting outdoors frequently.
If you prioritize rugged reliability and plan to shoot in harsh conditions, neither camera excels, but Leica’s solid build gives it a subtle edge in feel and long-term durability.
Lens Systems and Compatibility
Lens choice impacts final image quality and versatility.
-
Leica M Typ 262: Uses the Leica M mount, boasting over 59 native lenses including some of the finest prime lenses in existence. Artisanship and optical excellence here are top-tier, ideal if you love exploring classic primes with superb bokeh, micro-contrast, and minimal distortion.
-
Samsung NX2000: Compatible with Samsung NX lenses - a smaller lineup of 32 lenses ranging from wide-angle to telephoto zooms. The ecosystem is limited following Samsung’s exit from camera business, so future lens options and updates are scarce.
If lens availability and legacy glass are priorities, Leica dominates the landscape. Samsung’s system might suffice for casual use but lacks long-term expandability.
Battery Life and Storage Solutions
Nothing is more frustrating than a camera that dies mid-shoot or limits your workflow.
-
Leica M Typ 262: Uses the BP-SCL2 battery with an unknown official rating, but practical experience suggests around 300-350 shots per charge. Storage is on standard SD/SDHC/SDXC cards in a single slot.
-
Samsung NX2000: Rated for roughly 340 shots per charge using BP1130 battery. Storage relies on MicroSD cards - less common but smaller.
Overall, battery life is similar, both suited for casual to moderate shooting days but will require spare batteries for extended sessions.
Connectivity, Wireless Features, and Extras
Now let’s talk tech conveniences.
-
Leica M Typ 262: No built-in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC. USB 2.0 is the sole connectivity method and lacks HDMI output. GPS is optional and must be added externally.
-
Samsung NX2000: Built-in Wi-Fi and NFC make image sharing and remote control easy via smartphone. The camera has HDMI port and USB 2.0 for wired connections.
For the modern social sharer or traveler who wants quick uploads and smartphone integration, Samsung’s connectivity is a clear plus.
Video Capabilities
Samsung triumphed here; Leica M Typ 262 does not offer video recording.
-
Samsung NX2000: Offers Full HD 1080p at 30 fps, additional lower resolution modes, and MPEG-4/H.264 formats. While not advanced, the 1080p video is solid for casual use.
-
Leica M Typ 262: No video recording capabilities.
Videographers will find the Samsung NX2000 more versatile, though professionals will likely look elsewhere for serious video production.
Genre-Specific Performance Ratings: Who’s Best at What?
Let me sum up the practical strengths of each camera across main photography disciplines:
-
Portrait: Leica’s full-frame sensor and superb lenses produce richer skin tones and beautiful bokeh. Samsung’s autofocus and face detection aid beginners but can’t mimic the Leica’s rendering.
-
Landscape: Leica’s dynamic range and resolution provide exceptional detail and tonal gradation, edging out Samsung’s APS-C sensor.
-
Wildlife & Sports: Samsung’s autofocus and burst rate put it ahead for action capture, although modest compared to modern competitors.
-
Street: Leica’s discreet size and quiet shutter (within rangefinder limits) appeal to street photographers valuing minimalism. Samsung’s compactness and touchscreen also work well here.
-
Macro: Neither is specialized for macro, but lens choice on Leica gives it a potential advantage.
-
Night/Astro: Leica’s higher ISO performance and full-frame sensor handle low light better, though neither camera is tailored for astro.
-
Video: Samsung NX2000 only.
-
Travel: Samsung’s lightweight design and wireless features suit travel better; Leica requires commitment.
-
Professional Work: Leica’s file quality, manual control, and lens quality make it fit for pro use. Samsung is more of a consumer camera struggling in this arena.
Overall Performance Scores and Value Assessment
In purely objective scoring, Samsung NX2000 rates approximately 75 on DxO with solid color depth and dynamic range for its class. Leica M Typ 262 lacks DxO testing but is known for high-level image quality with a full-frame sensor and superb optics.
Price-wise, the Leica carries a premium ~$5,000+. The Samsung NX2000 comes in around $600, making it far more accessible.
For the value-conscious enthusiast or budget-conscious hobbyist, Samsung offers excellent bang for the buck. For professionals or collectors, Leica delivers unparalleled craftsmanship and image quality.
Final Recommendations: Who Should Choose Which?
Choose Leica M Typ 262 if...
- You crave timeless build quality combining digital with classic rangefinder charm.
- Manual focus and pure photographic control hold real appeal.
- Full-frame image quality, dynamic range, and legendary Leica lenses dominate your workflow.
- Your budget can absorb a premium price tag.
- You primarily shoot portraits, landscapes, or artistic stills requiring exquisite rendering.
- Video and fast autofocus are not priorities.
Choose Samsung NX2000 if...
- You want a lightweight, easy-to-use entry-level mirrorless that fits a tighter budget.
- Autofocus, face detection, and faster burst rates matter.
- You desire wireless connectivity and touchscreen control.
- Occasional Full HD video recording is a bonus.
- Your photography leans more towards travel, casual street, or family snapshots.
- You want a flexible APS-C system without a massive investment.
Closing Thoughts
Comparing the Leica M Typ 262 against the Samsung NX2000 is like comparing a master craftsman’s hand tool to a modern power tool. Each excels in its own realm: Leica for deliberate, high-quality manual photography, and Samsung for accessible, versatile shooting modes packed into a compact body.
Neither is perfect in all areas - Leica’s lack of autofocus and video can be limiting, while Samsung’s sensor and lens ecosystem limits ultimate image quality and long-term upgrade paths.
Your choice hinges on your photography style and budget. If you want to dive deep into the art and experience of photography itself, Leica is worth every cent. If you want practical functions, ease of use, and value, Samsung NX2000 is a great starting point.
Feel free to check out my gallery images below to see sample shots from both cameras and get a real sense of their output.
Happy shooting - no matter which side of the fence you land on!
Image credits: All in-house photography and comparative imaging tests performed under controlled conditions with standard lenses and lighting.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung NX2000 Specifications
| Leica M Typ 262 | Samsung NX2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Leica | Samsung |
| Model type | Leica M Typ 262 | Samsung NX2000 |
| Otherwise known as | Typ 262 | - |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2015-11-19 | 2013-11-30 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Maestro | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 855.6mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 21 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Leica M | Samsung NX |
| Total lenses | 59 | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 921k dots | 1,152k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | None |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | - | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 600 grams (1.32 pounds) | 228 grams (0.50 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 119 x 65 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 75 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 908 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 images |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BP-SCL2 | BP1130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC/ MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $5,069 | $599 |