Leica M8 vs Leica T Type 701
79 Imaging
49 Features
31 Overall
41
85 Imaging
58 Features
56 Overall
57
Leica M8 vs Leica T Type 701 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-H Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 160 - 2500
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 591g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Released July 2007
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12500
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica L Mount
- 384g - 134 x 69 x 33mm
- Launched April 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Leica M8 vs Leica T Typ 701: An Exhaustive Comparative Analysis for Serious Photographers
Choosing a Leica camera is rarely about casual use; it is a decision grounded in a dedication to craftsmanship, image quality, and often, a particular photographic philosophy. The Leica M8 and Leica T Typ 701, despite sharing the brand’s pedigree and rangefinder styling cues, represent markedly different technological eras and feature sets. This detailed comparison aims to elucidate how these two mid- and advanced-level mirrorless cameras stack up across a broad variety of photographic disciplines and practical use cases, grounded in hands-on testing and technical expertise accumulated over thousands of camera evaluations.

Design and Ergonomics: Tradition Meets Modern Minimalism
The Leica M8 owes much of its identity to the heritage of Leica rangefinders. It features the classic, tactile mechanical controls, a robust yet relatively heavy APS-H sensor body at 591g, and dimensions of approximately 139x80x37mm. The Leica T Typ 701, by contrast, is a deliberate departure towards modern minimalism with a 384g lightweight aluminum unibody construction measuring 134x69x33mm. This influences handling characteristics substantially.
- M8: The M8's larger size and heft provide a reassuring presence and grip stability, especially with larger lenses. The control layout is sparse, relying on traditional mechanical dials without an electronic viewfinder or live view, reflecting its design era focused on manual operation.
- T Typ 701: The T offers a more streamlined grip and a touchscreen-centric interface, trading some physical dials for digital control. The lighter body encourages prolonged handheld use and travel portability but can feel less substantial when paired with heavier optics.

The control layout comparison emphasizes the M8's rangefinder-style simplicity versus the T’s touchscreen-dominant interface with fewer physical buttons in contrast to digital menus. For users who value tactile feedback with precision dials, the M8 offers an unrivaled experience. Conversely, the T advances in user interface responsiveness and configurability, reflecting Leica’s embrace of contemporary user interfaces by 2014.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: CCD vs CMOS Debate
At the core of these two cameras lies a fundamental sensor technology divergence:

| Feature | Leica M8 | Leica T Typ 701 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | APS-H CCD (27x18mm) | APS-C CMOS (23.6x15.7mm) |
| Resolution | 10MP (3936x2630) | 16MP (4944x3278) |
| Native ISO Range | 160–2500 | 125–12500 |
| DxOMark Overall Score | 59 | 75 |
| Color Depth | 21.1 bits | 23.0 bits |
| Dynamic Range | 11.3 EV | 12.7 EV |
| Low Light ISO | 663 ISO | 1082 ISO |
| Anti-Aliasing Filter | None | Yes |
The M8’s APS-H CCD sensor delivers images with a distinct organic tonal quality and smooth color gradations that appeal to purists. However, its limited 10MP resolution and maximum native ISO of 2500 impose constraints in low-light scenarios and cropping flexibility. The absence of an anti-aliasing filter preserves fine detail.
The T’s APS-C CMOS sensor notably increases resolution to 16MP, expands ISO range significantly, and includes an anti-aliasing filter for fewer moiré patterns at the expense of some micro-detail. In our lab tests, the T demonstrated superior dynamic range by approximately 1.4 EV and better noise control at higher ISOs - a vital advantage for practical use in diverse lighting.
Viewfinder and Display Interface: Optical Rangefinder vs Touchscreen LCD

The M8 continues the Leica rangefinder tradition with an exclusive optical rangefinder viewfinder - without electronic overlay or real-time preview - requiring reliance on manual focus and exposure estimation skills. Its fixed 2.5-inch 230k-dot rear LCD provides minimal feedback and lacks live view.
The T Typ 701 embraces modern technology:
- 3.7-inch, 1.3M-dot touchscreen LCD delivers precise framing, instant histogram feedback, and extensive menu navigation.
- Optional electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 2.36M-dot resolution, 100% coverage, and 0.7x magnification available for purchase, significantly aiding composition and focus precision.
- Full live view support with touch autofocus and exposure controls transforms usability for subjects requiring rapid response.
For photographers transitioning from DSLR or mirrorless systems accustomed to live feedback, the T’s interface dramatically reduces the learning curve compared to the M8’s manual-centric operation that demands more experience and patience.
Autofocus and Manual Focusing: Manual Legacy vs Hybrid Focusing System
- Leica M8: Fully manual focus with no autofocus system, using mechanical rangefinder coupling. This demands extensive skill and limits action or low-light focusing speed. Focus confirmation is minimal, relying on the user’s judgement.
- Leica T Typ 701: Equipped with CMOS contrast-detection autofocus, offering single-shot, continuous, selective, multi-area, face detection, and tracking autofocus. Touch AF on the rear screen streamlines target acquisition.
Our comparative testing in challenging lighting and fast-moving subjects showed the T’s AF system as competent but not class-leading; it can struggle in low contrast or rapid autofocus front/rear transitions. Still, for most practical shooting scenarios including street or casual wildlife, it represents a substantial functional leap over the M8’s fully manual focus.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Robustness Evaluated
Both cameras lack professional-grade environmental sealing:
- Neither is weatherproof, dustproof, shockproof, crushproof, or freezeproof.
- The M8’s heavier magnesium alloy chassis and mechanical build exhibit notable durability and a traditional Leica craftsmanship feel.
- The T’s aluminum unibody offers resilience but is more susceptible to wear over years.
Photographers shooting in challenging weather should note these limitations, especially since neither camera is designed explicitly for rugged outdoor use. Protective measures or external housings are recommended for harsh conditions.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: M-Mount vs L-Mount Options
| Camera | Lens Mount | Number of Lenses Tested/Available | Notable Compatibility |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leica M8 | Leica M | 59+ | Wide range of Leica M-mount lenses and legacy optics; focal length multiplier ~1.3x applies for field of view conversion |
| Leica T Typ 701 | Leica L | 4+ | Native Leica L mount lenses optimized for digital sensors; also adaptable to other lens systems with adapters (e.g., Leica M, R, etc.) |
In practice:
- The M8’s Leica M-mount benefits from decades of lens development, delivering outstanding optical quality, especially with primes renowned for bokeh and rendition suited to portraiture and street photography. However, the 1.3x crop factor alters focal length handling slightly, requiring consideration.
- The T’s L-mount system is newer and smaller in lens breadth but optimized for modern optics and sensor characteristics. Adaptability offers flexibility but may necessitate manual focus lenses, impacting autofocus advantage.
Lens availability and optical character should factor heavily into purchase decisions depending on photographer priorities - whether legacy glass utilization or preference for modern digital-optimized designs.
Burst Shooting and Shutter Performance: Capturing the Decisive Moment
- Leica M8: No continuous shooting mode; mechanical shutter speeds range from 8 seconds to 1/8000s. The absence of burst capability restricts its applicability for action or sports photography.
- Leica T Typ 701: Capable of 5 fps continuous shooting with shutter speeds between 30 seconds and 1/4000s, providing usable flexibility for moderate action shooting.
In field testing, the T’s burst rate is adequate for capturing spontaneous street scenes or casual sports but falls short of professional sports cameras delivering double-digit fps. The M8’s lack of continuous mode confines its use primarily to deliberate, static compositions.
Video Capabilities: Silent Observer or Basic HD Recorder?
The M8 entirely lacks video functionality. In contrast, the T Typ 701 offers:
- Full HD 1080p (1920x1080) video recording at 30 fps.
- MPEG-4 format recording.
- No external microphone or headphone jack limits professional audio control.
- No 4K or advanced video features.
Video enthusiasts will find the T a marginally useful tool for versatile multimedia capture, suitable for casual video documentation but inadequate for professional video production.
Battery Life and Storage: Staying Powered in the Field
- M8: Rated for approximately 550 shots per charge using a proprietary battery pack; uses SD/SDHC storage in a single slot.
- T Typ 701: Rated at 400 shots per charge from BP-DC13 lithium-ion battery; supports SD/SDHC/SDXC cards in one slot.
The M8’s marginally superior battery performance benefits extended shooting sessions without compromising weight further. The T’s touchscreen and live view operations primarily consume more power, reducing shooting endurance.
Connectivity and Additional Features
- M8: Limited to USB 2.0 data transfer; no wireless or GPS connectivity.
- T Typ 701: Incorporates built-in Wi-Fi for wireless image transfer and remote control capabilities but lacks Bluetooth or integrated GPS (offered as optional accessory).
Leica’s gradual embrace of connectivity is evident, with the T typifying state-of-the-art conveniences circa 2014 that enhance workflow integration.
Subject-Specific Performance Breakdown: Matching Camera to Discipline
| Photography Type | Leica M8 Strengths | Leica T Typ 701 Strengths | Summary Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Superb skin tones, classic bokeh, manual precision focus | Faster AF, higher resolution, face detection AF | M8 preferred by portrait purists; T better for dynamic portraiture |
| Landscape | Greater sensor area, smooth color (CCD) | Higher DR, higher resolution, touchscreen framing | T offers superior technical image quality; M8 favored for tonal quality |
| Wildlife | Limited applicability due to no AF or burst | Contrast AF, continuous AF, 5fps burst | T is far more practical for casual wildlife |
| Sports | No continuous mode, manual focus hinders | 5fps burst, continuous AF but limited speed | T suitable for casual sports, not professional level |
| Street | Discreet design, quiet shutter, manual focus | Lightweight, touchscreen, live view | M8 preferred by traditionalists; T preferred for portability and speed |
| Macro | Manual focus precision | AF possible, but lacks dedicated macro features | M8 for focused macro work; T easier for quick shooting |
| Night/Astro | High tonal quality; ISO limitations | Higher ISO capability; lacks bulb mode | T better for high ISO; M8 favored for controlled exposures |
| Video | None | Basic HD video | Significant advantage to T |
| Travel | Robust build, classic experience | Lightweight, fast AF, touchscreen | T optimizes travel versatility |
| Professional Work | Durable body, superior color depth, large sensor | Modern interface, better connectivity | Depends on workflow preferences |
Real-World Imaging Samples: Comparative Field Examination
Hands-on evaluation confirms the M8’s images manifest natural color gradations and luscious bokeh with distinctive Leica character. The T delivers noticeably sharper detail, superior dynamic range, and cleaner high-ISO performance, though at the cost of somewhat less "organic" CCD tonal qualities.
Both cameras excel in rendering lens quality; however, the T’s post-processing flexibility due to higher resolution enhances printing and editing scopes.
Overall Performance Ratings and Value Assessment
The DxOMark scores and practical tests place the Leica T Typ 701 ahead in overall sensor performance, autofocus, and versatility metrics. The M8 retains merits in unique image character, construction, and an authentic Leica shooting experience, though technology limitations render it less flexible today.
Final Recommendations: Who Should Choose Which Leica?
-
Choose Leica M8 if:
- You are deeply rooted in Leica’s manual rangefinder tradition.
- You prioritize classic tonal rendition and large sensor size.
- You mainly shoot portraits, street, or landscape in controlled conditions.
- You value tactile mechanical controls and optical viewfinder authenticity.
- Budget allows for a niche tool and you accept operational constraints.
-
Choose Leica T Typ 701 if:
- You seek a more versatile, modern digital rangefinder-style camera.
- You desire autofocus, live view, touchscreen interface.
- You shoot drafts involving video, wildlife, sports, or travel frequently.
- You want enhanced image quality in high ISO and dynamic range.
- You prefer light portability without sacrificing essential Leica build quality.
Summary: Leica M8 vs Leica T Typ 701 - Distinct Tools for Different Photographic Philosophies
The M8 and T Typ 701 represent distinct Leica eras and usage paradigms. The M8 prioritizes tradition and manual engagement with a unique CCD sensor, while the T Typ 701 modernizes the Leica experience with technological advancements in autofocus, sensor design, and usability.
Choosing between them ultimately depends on the photographer’s workflow preferences, subject priorities, and openness to contemporary or classic camera handling. Both deliver Leica’s legendary craftsmanship and image quality hallmarks, yet each excels in specific domains of photographic practice.
This detailed evaluation should empower Leica enthusiasts and professionals to align their selection with realistic performance expectations, operational needs, and creative objectives.
Article and analysis by an industry expert with 15+ years of hands-on Leica and mirrorless camera testing and review.
Leica M8 vs Leica T Type 701 Specifications
| Leica M8 | Leica T Typ 701 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Leica | Leica |
| Model type | Leica M8 | Leica T Typ 701 |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Released | 2007-07-31 | 2014-04-24 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-H | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 27 x 18mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 486.0mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3936 x 2630 | 4944 x 3278 |
| Highest native ISO | 2500 | 12500 |
| Min native ISO | 160 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Leica M | Leica L |
| Total lenses | 59 | 4 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.3 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inch | 3.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 1,300 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.50 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 591g (1.30 lb) | 384g (0.85 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 134 x 69 x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 59 | 75 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.1 | 23.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 12.7 |
| DXO Low light rating | 663 | 1082 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 550 photographs | 400 photographs |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | BP-DC13 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $4,400 | $1,603 |