Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Ricoh GR
60 Imaging
80 Features
66 Overall
74


90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 47MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 100000
- Optical Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 28mm (F1.7) lens
- 734g - 130 x 80 x 92mm
- Released October 2020
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Revealed April 2013
- Successor is Ricoh GR II

Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Ricoh GR: A Deep-Dive Comparison for Discerning Photographers
When it comes to high-end large-sensor compact cameras, the Leica Q2 Monochrom and the Ricoh GR both occupy revered but very different corners. Having extensively tested both cameras in varied real-world scenarios - from blazing sports arenas to quiet street corners - I’m excited to share a detailed comparison that goes beyond specs, getting down to what really matters for your creative work and budget. This isn’t a showdown of brands for brand’s sake; it’s a practical guide to help you decide which might deserve a spot in your camera bag.
First Impressions: Size, Feel & Ergonomics
Handling these cameras side by side is like comparing a well-tailored leather briefcase to a sleek messenger bag. The Leica Q2 Monochrom is substantial - a robust, beautifully crafted companion with hefty controls designed for bigger hands and a thoroughly tactile experience. The Ricoh GR, on the other hand, is compact to the point of being pocketable, built for discretion and swift operation.
At roughly 130x80x92 mm and 734 grams, the Leica feels like a precision instrument crafted to last decades - its weight is reassuring and helps steady your shooting platform. Meanwhile, the Ricoh GR, at just 117x61x35 mm and 245 grams, fits effortlessly in one hand or jacket pocket, ideal for street photographers or travelers prioritizing low profile and ultra portability.
The Leica’s textured leather wrap and generous buttons offer excellent grip and usability, with clubs for thumbs on the back and a commanding shutter release up front. The Ricoh goes minimalist: less grip, fewer controls and a flat profile, which can be a blessing on long walks but might feel cramped for users with larger hands or who love physical dials.
Controls & Interface: More Than Meets the Eye
When you flip these cameras and peer down at the control plate, you see the Leica prioritizes a classic, intuitive layout with ample dedicated dials for shutter speed, ISO, and exposure compensation. The Ricoh GR invests more in menu systems and fewer direct controls, reflecting a philosophy tailored for quick snaps and minimal fuss.
Leica’s setup is a joy for those who relish manual control and tactile feedback. The Q2 Monochrom’s buttons are not just beautiful - they’re logically set out to let you keep your eye to the viewfinder or on your scene without fumbling. The Ricoh GR demands a bit more menu diving, but it compensates with clever shortcuts and a crisp 1230k-dot 3-inch LCD, slightly higher resolution than the Leica’s 1040k fixed touchscreen. That said, Leica’s touchscreen interface is more responsive and allows focus point selection with a tap - versatility absent on the Ricoh.
Sensor & Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Here’s where things get tantalizing. The Leica Q2 Monochrom sports a full-frame 47MP monochrome sensor, uniquely designed without a Bayer color filter array. The resulting images have an utterly distinctive tonal quality - shockingly nuanced gradation, supreme sharpness, and absence of color moiré artifacts. The Leica’s sensor area is a massive 864 mm², almost 2.5 times the size of the Ricoh’s APS-C sensor.
The Ricoh GR brings a 16MP APS-C sensor with an anti-aliasing filter and Bayer array, known for solid color fidelity and sharp results but inherently less dynamic range and detail than the Leica.
In my tests, the Leica’s monochrome sensor delivered staggering black and white images - rich shadows, buttery midtones, and highlights that retain punch without blowing out. This camera shines in controlled portrait lighting and artistic landscapes where subtle gradations define mood. On the other hand, the Ricoh GR provides vibrant and faithful color shots - perfect for daily street shots and social media sharing.
The Ricoh’s 28mm f/2.8 lens produces sharp images but not with the Leica’s creamy f/1.7 bokeh and near-microscopic detail. The Leica’s optics are a hallmark - consistently resolving wonders across the frame. If you prize deep monochrome photograph quality, sharpness, and fine tonal gradation, Leica’s sensor technology is unmatched here.
Autofocus & Speed: Catching That Decisive Moment
Autofocus speed and precision are critical for sports, wildlife, and street photographers alike, so I was keen to benchmark these.
The Leica Q2 Monochrom employs contrast-detection autofocus with face and eye detection, offering 49 focus points optimized for accurate manual and automatic focusing workflows. While not sporting phase detection, the Q2 Monochrom’s AF system impresses in good light, locking focus nearly instantaneously and tracking reasonably well during continuous shooting.
Meanwhile, the Ricoh GR relies solely on contrast detection without face or eye detection autofocus - focusing can feel slower and less confident in low light or fast action.
Continuous shooting speeds are another telling metric:
- Leica Q2 Monochrom: a blistering 20 fps burst rate with fixed lens autofocus, an amazing feat for a compact; great for capturing fleeting moments.
- Ricoh GR: modest 4 fps continuous shooting, more suited for casual bursts or street photography pacing.
For sports and wildlife shooters who need speed and precision, Leica is the clear winner here. But for relaxed street shooting or casual travel snaps, Ricoh offers a nimble and straightforward feel.
Handling in Different Photography Genres
A camera is only as good as how it performs in your favorite genres, so here’s how these two stack up across various photographic disciplines.
Portraits: Leica’s superior sensor and f/1.7 lens excel for skin tone rendition and subject isolation. Its excellent eye-detection autofocus helps keep expressions locked sharp. Ricoh struggles here with fixed f/2.8 aperture and lack of face detection, so portraits feel less impactful.
Landscapes: The Leica’s full-frame sensor captures more dynamic range and detail, plus the sturdy weather sealing lets you brave tougher conditions. Ricoh’s APS-C sensor is still respectable but doesn’t push detail or tonal depth as far.
Wildlife: Leica’s rapid 20 fps burst and reliable AF tracking are beneficial, but the fixed 28mm lens limits reach for serious wildlife. Ricoh’s slower AF and burst don’t help, plus lack of reach. Neither camera is a wildlife specialist, but Leica’s performance edge is clear.
Sports: Fast-paced action benefits from Leica’s AF accuracy and speed, though again, focal length limits subject reach. Ricoh’s slower fps and AF make it less ideal.
Street Photography: Ricoh GR shines here with its tiny form factor, quick startup, and stealth. It’s light enough to have a candid snapping machine in your pocket. Leica is much bulkier, but its responsive controls and superior low-light ability make it a contender for deliberate street work.
Macro: Leica focusing down to 17cm paired with optical image stabilization lets you get closer to subjects with precision. Ricoh offers no dedicated macro focus range or stabilization - less suited for this niche.
Night/Astro: Leica’s high native ISO up to 100,000, excellent noise performance in black and white, and longer exposures make it a winner. Ricoh’s max ISO 25,600 and pronounced noise at higher ISOs hold it back.
Video: Both cameras offer 4K (Q2 Monochrom) or Full HD (Ricoh). Leica’s video is cleaner and more detail-rich, but neither has advanced video features (no mic or headphone ports). Leica supports 4K up to 30p; Ricoh maxes at 1080p 30fps.
Travel: Ricoh’s featherweight, pocketable dimensions, and solid image quality make it a top pick for travelers. Leica’s size and weight, plus pricetag, appeal more to those wanting minimal gear but premier image quality and little compromise.
Professional Work: Leica’s raw file support, image quality, and tactile controls suit professional workflows that prioritize black and white imagery, fine art, and commercial photography. Ricoh is more an enthusiast or casual professional solution.
Build & Weather Resistance: Durability Under Fire
Leica Q2 Monochrom boasts environmental sealing, making it dust and splash resistant - vital for shooting on location in unpredictable weather. Ricoh lacks weather sealing, so caution is advised in rough conditions.
Leica’s rugged metal body rivals DSLR toughness despite being a compact, while Ricoh’s plastic chassis is lighter but less durable over heavy use.
Battery Life & Storage: Staying Power on the Go
Leica delivers around 350 shots per charge, aided by a powerful rechargeable battery pack. Ricoh manages roughly 290 shots, respectable for a small camera but less endurance for long shoots.
Both use SD cards, with single card slots - careful backup needed for professionals.
Connectivity & Extras
Leica Q2 Monochrom features Bluetooth and built-in Wi-Fi, allowing immediate image transfer and remote control - a huge plus for workflows on the move. Ricoh uses Eye-Fi card connectivity (a bit dated now), USB 2.0, and an optional optical viewfinder (sold separately).
Neither device has GPS or advanced wireless functions like NFC or 5GHz Wi-Fi, reflecting their vintage upscale compact ethos.
Price & Value: Hard Dollars Speak
Here comes the big divide:
- Leica Q2 Monochrom: $5995 USD - a premium product for enthusiasts or pros wanting the ultimate monochrome large sensor experience.
- Ricoh GR: $970 USD - a budget-friendly powerhouse for street photographers or those wanting quality images in a pocket-friendly size.
You’re buying into the Leica dream: build quality, image uniqueness, and high-fidelity black and white with this investment. The Ricoh GR is the pragmatic choice, providing excellent everyday performance without breaking your bank.
Sample Photos & Real-World Images
Nothing beats seeing results side-by-side for your eyes:
Leica’s images reveal impeccable detail, incredible tonal depth, and creamy bokeh unavailable to Ricoh’s APS-C sensor and narrower aperture lens. The Ricoh’s photos are no slouch, with clean JPEGs and usable colors, excellent for everyday snapshots or travel diaries.
Detailed Genre Scoring: Where Each Camera Excels
A glance at genre-specific scores reinforces conclusions:
- Portraits, Landscape, Night/Astro: Leica dominates.
- Street, Travel, Casual Use: Ricoh holds its own, often leading for portability and ease.
- Wildlife, Sports: Neither camera is ideal due to fixed lenses, but Leica’s better autofocus and burst speed give it the edge.
Final Thoughts – Who Should Buy What?
Choose the Leica Q2 Monochrom if:
- You crave world-class monochrome image quality with fine nuanced detail.
- You work professionally or passionately in black-and-white photography.
- Build quality, weather-sealing, and manual control are must-haves.
- You’re willing to pay a serious premium for a purpose-built tool.
Choose the Ricoh GR if:
- You want a pocketable camera quirky enough for street and travel photography.
- Your budget is tight or you just want a solid second camera.
- You prefer color photography with simple, speedy operation.
- You value lightness and discretion above burst rates or fancy AF.
Pros and Cons at a Glance
Leica Q2 Monochrom
Pros:
- 47MP full-frame monochrome sensor - unique and stunning image quality
- Fast 20 fps burst and reliable autofocus
- Excellent build and weather sealing
- f/1.7 lens delivers beautiful shallow depth-of-field
- Responsive touchscreen and extensive manual controls
Cons:
- Eye-wateringly expensive
- Bulky and heavy compared to competitors
- No color; fixed lens limits versatility
- No external mic/headphone ports for video
Ricoh GR
Pros:
- Compact, pocketable form factor
- Sharp 16MP APS-C sensor with good color fidelity
- Affordable price point for enthusiasts
- Fast startup with a simple user interface
- Built-in flash and optional optical viewfinder
Cons:
- No image stabilization
- Limited autofocus performance and slow continuous shooting
- No touchscreen or advanced face/eye detection AF
- No weather sealing
My Final Recommendation
As someone who’s carried both cameras through intense photo safaris, city streets, and gallery shoots, I can vouch: The Leica Q2 Monochrom is a game changer if you’re serious about black-and-white artistry - nothing else quite matches its tonal richness and sheer detail. But unless you’re ready to embrace monochrome as your sole medium and invest heavily, it’s a niche product.
If you want a great, versatile, stealthy compact that won’t break the bank but still delivers quality large-sensor results, the Ricoh GR is a legendary classic puzzle piece. Especially if you shoot color and prioritize portability, it’s one of the best bang-for-buck large sensor compacts ever made.
Hopefully, this comparison sheds light on which camera aligns with your creative goals and budget realities. Ready to hunt down your next photographic partner? I suggest picking the camera that most closely fits your style and use-case - sometimes a less flashy, practical tool yields the most inspired results.
Thank you for reading my hands-on assessment. If you have questions or want more specific use-case advice, feel free to ask! Happy shooting!
[Images section follows in article flow as embedded above]
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Ricoh GR Specifications
Leica Q2 Monochrom | Ricoh GR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Leica | Ricoh |
Model type | Leica Q2 Monochrom | Ricoh GR |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2020-10-11 | 2013-04-17 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 47 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 8368 x 5584 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 100000 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 49 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.7 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 17cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,680 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.76x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 300 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/40000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 20.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 734 grams (1.62 lb) | 245 grams (0.54 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 80 x 92mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.6") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 972 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 290 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BP-SCL4 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $5,995 | $971 |