Leica Q2 vs Sigma DP2x
61 Imaging
78 Features
70 Overall
74


86 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Leica Q2 vs Sigma DP2x Key Specs
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 41mm (F) lens
- 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
- Launched February 2011
- Old Model is Sigma DP2s

Leica Q2 vs Sigma DP2x: A Deep Dive Into Two Iconic Large Sensor Compacts
Choosing a large sensor compact camera has always meant finding a sweet spot - balancing image quality, handling, and portability while staying true to your creative style. Two intriguing options, separated by nearly a decade but united by their impressively large sensors and fixed focal-length lenses, are the Leica Q2 and Sigma DP2x. Both are beloved for markedly different reasons, but the devil - and delight - is in the details.
Having logged hundreds of hours testing, shooting, and comparing cameras across genres, I’m eager to walk you through a detailed face-off between these two. From pixel punch to autofocus agility, physical ergonomics to real-world performance, this guide helps you decide which is your next creative companion - or simply a worthy study in photographic evolution.
Size Up: Form Factor and Ergonomics
At a glance, the Leica Q2 looks like a hefty, confident powerhouse beside the slim and modestly sized Sigma DP2x. The Q2’s dimensions (130x80x92mm, 718g) bring a solid, comfortable grip that feels reassuring on longer shoots, especially when working handheld in low light or slow shutter speed scenarios. The Sigma, by contrast, at 113x60x56mm and just 280g, is far more pocketable - a true everyday carry camera.
But size isn’t just about portability; it’s also about control and balance. The Leica's build radiates precision-engineered luxury with classic Leica cues - chunky dials, a well-placed shutter button, and an intuitive layout that invites quick manual tweaks, all while incorporating weather sealing, a feature Sigma can only dream of here. The DP2x feels more minimalistic and somewhat toy-like by comparison, though its rough-around-the-edges charm works if you prefer ultra-lightweight travel gear or minimalist setups.
If you shoot landscapes or portraits and want a camera that’s ready to engage you more physically, the Q2 wins on ergonomics. But for street photographers or travelers who prize discretion above all, the DP2x's petite size adds a definite appeal.
Design Language: Control Layout and Top View Comparison
One of the first tactile experiences beginners notice with the Leica Q2 is its expertly thought-out top plate. The Q2 sports dedicated dials for shutter speed, exposure compensation, and ISO, with the shutter button well-positioned for natural finger placement. The controls exude a refined confidence befitting a camera priced north of $5,000.
The Sigma is more Spartan: fewer physical controls, and a more modest, “point and shoot” feel with a lesser tactile feedback quality. This translates to slower manual operation - especially when rapidly changing settings matters. My experience shows you’ll rely more on menus and less on instinctive dials, a difference that matters in fast-paced environments like street or event photography.
That said, the DP2x’s top plate, with its small LCD and buttons, reflects the technology expectations of its era (2011), while the Leica’s controls feel anchored firmly in 2019’s progress. For pro photographers used to quick reflexes, the Q2’s layout supports a faster, more flexible workflow.
Sensor Showdown: From Foveon Innovation to Full-Frame Brilliance
Here lies perhaps the most fundamental divergence: sensor technology. The Leica Q2 boasts a 47.3-megapixel, full-frame CMOS sensor - a remarkable leap in resolution and image quality over most fixed-lens compacts, with no anti-aliasing filter. It supports ISO up to 50,000, with superb dynamic range (13.5 EV per DxOMark), and color depth (26.4 bits), delivering outstanding detail, tonal richness, and low-light prowess.
The Sigma DP2x opts for a different path with its APS-C sized 20.7x13.8mm Foveon X3 sensor. Rather than capturing color via Bayer filters, this sensor captures full color information at every pixel with three stacked layers - a truly unique approach. The native resolution sits around 5 megapixels spatially, but the effective color resolution can feel richer in certain scenarios. This camera impresses with sharpness and color accuracy when lighting cooperates but falls behind in low light and dynamic range.
For me, the Q2’s sensor is a joy in versatility - portraits with sumptuous detail and smooth bokeh, landscapes with wide latitude, and night shots retaining texture without excessive noise. The DP2x’s sensor gives images a distinctive “film-like” signature but demands perfect light and slower shooting styles to get the most.
Seeing is Believing: Rear LCD and Interface
Screen quality often shapes daily shooting pleasure. The Leica Q2’s three-inch touchscreen with 1,040k dots is a pleasure - crisp, bright, and with responsive touch controls that let you set focus points intuitively or swipe through images swiftly. The fixed screen complements the robust viewfinder, making framing in varied lighting conditions a cinch.
Sigma’s 2.5-inch, 230k-dot screen feels cramped and low-res, a blunt reminder of its age and positioning. No touchscreen capability means slower menu navigation and less convenience for manual focus confirmation or exposure adjustment on the fly.
For those who prefer electronic viewfinders, the Leica’s built-in EVF is a standout: a 3.68 million-dot OLED panel with 100% coverage and 0.76x magnification - not the largest out there, but crisp and bright enough for confident framing. Sigma DP2x offers no EVF, relying solely on the LCD. In bright outdoor environments, this is a significant drawback.
Autofocus Systems: Contrast Detection vs. Modern Hybrid Solutions
Autofocus can make or break moments. The Leica Q2 features a 49-point contrast-detection autofocus system with touch-focus capabilities and face detection. Though it lacks phase-detection points (common in hybrid systems), its autofocus is fast and accurate - especially in good light. Continuous AF tracking, while present, is not the Leica's strong suit compared to mirrorless rivals, but sufficient for casual wildlife or sports snapshots with static subjects.
The Sigma DP2x sticks to simple contrast detection, with no continuous AF and no dedicated focus points. My hands-on testing reveals sluggish focus acquisition, prone to hunting in lower light, and no eye or face detection aids. For portraits or macro work (where precision focusing is king), the DP2x demands patience and steady hands.
In essence, if you’re after a camera with snappy and flexible autofocus that “just works,” the Leica Q2 is head and shoulders above the DP2x.
Lens Wisdom: Fixed Prime with Commitment vs. The 41mm Signature
Both cameras come with impressively sharp prime lenses - no zooming here, so compositional discipline is a must.
-
Leica Q2: 28mm f/1.7 Summilux lens. A bright wide-angle that’s perfect for environmental portraits, street, documentary, and landscapes. The f/1.7 aperture delivers creamy bokeh and strong low-light abilities. Optical image stabilization adds another layer of stabilization.
-
Sigma DP2x: 41mm fixed lens with f/2.8 aperture (though exact aperture isn’t specified here). A more “standard” focal range on APS-C, roughly equivalent to 62mm full-frame perspective (because of the 1.7x crop factor). This lends itself well to tighter portraits and “normal” shooting perspectives.
From experience, the Leica’s Summilux shines with trademark Leica bokeh and minimal distortion, nice sharpness from edge to edge, and close focusing down to 17cm enabling some near-macro creativity.
Sigma's lens performs admirably for its vintage but is less versatile given its slower aperture and crop factor. It’s a prime choice for static subjects rather than spontaneous action or ultra-wide scenes.
Burst and Buffer: The Need for Speed
The Leica Q2 offers a blazing 20fps continuous shooting speed using its electronic shutter! This is an extraordinary benefit for wildlife and sports shooters who want to catch fleeting action without switching to a dedicated DSLR or mirrorless sports camera. The buffer size supports reasonably long bursts, allowing more selective post-shoot culling.
The Sigma DP2x, meanwhile, maxes out at an anemic 3fps continuously and is hamstrung by slower processing due to its older True II processor and large amounts of Foveon data per frame. Action and sports photographers will find this a non-starter.
Weather Resistance and Durability
Leica takes robustness seriously in the Q2’s weather-sealed magnesium alloy body - a much-needed feature for landscape, travel, and outdoor photographers often facing dust and moisture. The Sigma DP2x has no environmental sealing, making it less suited to serious outdoor conditions or professional use.
Video Capabilities: An Uneven Battle
Neither camera is a video powerhouse, but the Leica Q2 makes a respectable effort with UHD 4K recording at 24/30 fps and Full HD up to 120 fps for slow-motion effects. Videos benefit from the fast Summilux lens brightness and electronic stabilization.
The Sigma DP2x’s video capabilities are minimal - a mere 320x240p Motion JPEG clip, which is effectively unusable by today’s standards.
If you expect to dabble in serious video, the Leica is clearly the superior choice.
Battery Life and Storage Options
The Leica Q2’s rated capacity of about 370 shots per charge is decent for a compact full-frame, though not extraordinary (many cameras now exceed 400+). Still, with USB charging and an efficient processor, carrying a spare battery resolves any field endurance issues.
The Sigma DP2x’s battery life is unspecified but based on its age and power draw, expect a shorter shooting session. Both cameras use a single card slot, the Leica accepts SD/SDHC/SDXC, while the Sigma supports SD/SDHC/MMC, a versatile but older generation.
Connectivity and Workflow
Today’s shooters demand wireless connectivity - and Leica includes Wi-Fi and Bluetooth in the Q2 for seamless pairing with smartphones and tablets, allowing remote control and instant image sharing via the Leica FOTOS app.
The Sigma DP2x has none of these modern bells and whistles, firmly anchoring it as an offline device. USB 2.0 connectivity on both cameras is slower than today’s norm.
For professional workflows requiring fast transfers or robust tethered control, the Q2’s connectivity is a valuable asset.
Price vs Performance: Is Leica Always Worth It?
While the Leica Q2 retails upwards of $5,000, the Sigma DP2x lands dramatically cheaper around $700 new (though increasingly rare on the market). This gulf reflects not just sensor size and speed but also build quality, features, and modern usability.
Does the Q2’s steep price tag justify itself? If you value outstanding image quality, high resolution for large prints or cropping, swift operation, and a luxury tactile experience, yes. The Q2 delivers a professional-grade tool that also excels as a daily companion.
If budget is tight or you’re curious about the Foveon sensor’s unique character and can live with slower performance and lower resolution, the Sigma DP2x can still offer a niche charm - especially for those loving deliberate, contemplative shooting.
Real-Life Image Samples: Quality Speaks Louder Than Specs
Examining diverse real-world images brings this comparison to life. The Leica’s shots brim with detail, vibrant yet true colors, and subtle tonal transitions in shadows and highlights. Skin tones sing with natural warmth, and bokeh renders portraits with creamy separation.
The Sigma DP2x’s output surprises - colors are punchy, and its edge sharpness is solid, especially in daylight, giving a distinctive “medium format” film-like aesthetic thanks to the Foveon sensor architecture. However, noise becomes intrusive in shadowed or dim scenes, and dynamic range limitations demand careful exposure.
Both cameras carry their legacy in image character - Leica’s precision versus Sigma’s color fidelity - but the Q2’s technical superiority translates to a broader hands-on shooting experience.
How They Score: Overall and by Genre
Overall Performance Ratings:
- Leica Q2: 96 (DxOMark top-tier score reflecting color depth, dynamic range, low-light sensitivity)
- Sigma DP2x: Not tested by DxOMark due to niche sensor technology, but understood as solid for daylight static scenes
Genre-Specific Strengths:
- Portraits: Leica excels with lifelike skin tones, wide aperture, eye AF; Sigma lags without face detection or fast AF
- Landscapes: Leica’s dynamic range and weather sealing dominate; Sigma offers fine detail in bright outdoor shots
- Wildlife & Sports: Leica’s 20fps and stabilization shine; Sigma’s slow AF and frame rate are limiting
- Street & Travel: Sigma’s smaller size and discrete design help; Leica balances size with better image quality and reliability
- Macro: Leica’s close focus and stabilization outperform Sigma’s fixed capabilities
- Night & Astro: Leica’s high ISO and sensor excel; Sigma’s low ISO ceiling limits performance
- Video: Leica vastly superior to almost non-functional Sigma video
- Professional Work: Leica’s RAW, connectivity, and build make it a professional tool; Sigma remains a niche enthusiast option
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
The Leica Q2 stands tall as a modern champion for photographers craving uncompromised image quality, ergonomic comfort, and versatile performance across genres - from precise studio portraits to dynamic street scenes and wild landscapes. Its price and weight demand serious commitment, but the reward is a camera that enables creativity with confidence and sophistication.
The Sigma DP2x, meanwhile, serves as a fascinating relic and specialist tool. It appeals most to those curious about the Foveon sensor’s unique color and detail traits or the minimalistic allure of a straightforward, no-nonsense compact. For photographers who value portability and price over speed and versatility, it’s a viable alternative.
Who should buy the Leica Q2?
- Professionals and serious enthusiasts wanting high-resolution full-frame excellence
- Portrait, landscape, and low-light photographers prioritizing advanced autofocus and stabilization
- Videographers needing 4K video with image stabilization
- Travelers who don’t mind carrying bulk for uncompromised control
Who might consider the Sigma DP2x?
- Budget-conscious photographers intrigued by Foveon sensor color fidelity
- Street shooters wanting a pocketable, discreet large sensor camera
- Users who shoot mostly in good light and prioritize unique rendering over speed
- Collectors or enthusiasts appreciating photographic history and quirkiness
In the tight realm of large sensor compacts, the Leica Q2 defines what a premium, all-rounder camera should be today - while the Sigma DP2x remains a niche marvel from a past era, with an enduring cult appeal. Whichever path you choose, understanding these cameras’ strengths and quirks empowers you to match their capabilities to your creative aims.
Happy shooting!
Leica Q2 vs Sigma DP2x Specifications
Leica Q2 | Sigma DP2x | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Sigma |
Model type | Leica Q2 | Sigma DP2x |
Alternative name | Type No. 4889 | - |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2019-03-07 | 2011-02-08 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | True II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 47 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 8368 x 5584 | 2640 x 1760 |
Maximum native ISO | 50000 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 49 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 41mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/1.7 | - |
Macro focusing range | 17cm | - |
Crop factor | 1 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,680k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.76x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 15 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/40000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 20.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.30 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/500 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4K/30/24p, 1080/120/60/30/24p | 320 x 240 |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 320x240 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 718 grams (1.58 pounds) | 280 grams (0.62 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 80 x 92mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.6") | 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 96 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 2491 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 370 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BP-SCL4 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/MMC |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $4,985 | $699 |