Leica TL2 vs Panasonic GM1
85 Imaging
67 Features
64 Overall
65
93 Imaging
52 Features
60 Overall
55
Leica TL2 vs Panasonic GM1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 50000
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 399g - 134 x 69 x 33mm
- Introduced July 2017
- Superseded the Leica TL
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 204g - 99 x 55 x 30mm
- Revealed December 2013
- Updated by Panasonic GM5
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Leica TL2 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1: A Real-World Mirrorless Showdown for Serious Enthusiasts
Choosing your next camera can be a dizzying process, especially when devices sit on opposite ends of the mirrorless spectrum - the Leica TL2, a premium APS-C advanced mirrorless, versus the compact, entry-level Panasonic Lumix GM1 Micro Four Thirds. With years of hands-on experience testing cameras inside out, I’m here to walk you through how these two differ in practical use, technical chops, and photographic versatility. Whether you’re a portrait shooter, landscape lover, or road tripper, this comparison unpacks every relevant angle so you know which camera suits your style and budget best.
The Full-Body Experience: Handling and Ergonomics That Matter
Let’s start at the tactile heart of using any camera: how it feels in your hands and how intuitive the controls are. You don’t want to wrestle with fiddly buttons or a poor grip when capturing fleeting moments.
The Leica TL2 features a robust aluminum unibody that’s surprisingly compact yet serious. It weighs approximately 399 grams (battery included) and measures 134 x 69 x 33 mm, sitting comfortably in my medium-sized hand. Leica’s design is rangefinder-style minimalist, but the tactile feel of the precision-machined chassis is unmistakably premium and durable. However, it lacks weather sealing - a bit surprising for the price class.
Conversely, the Panasonic GM1 is exceptionally tiny, weighing a mere 204 grams and measuring just 99 x 55 x 30 mm. Its diminutive stature makes it incredibly pocketable and discreet, a big plus for street photographers who want to stay under the radar. Build quality leans more plastic than metal, so while it feels solid, it’s not quite in the Leica’s league for ruggedness.

The lack of a native electronic viewfinder on both models means you’re relying on the rear LCD for composing shots. The TL2’s slightly larger body offers a better handgrip and more physical controls, which I find expedite changing settings quickly in the field. The GM1, while charmingly portable, makes you dive into menus more often, hampering rapid operation somewhat.
Design and Usability: Navigating the Controls and Interface
Once you pick up a camera, the button layout and screen interface dictate how fluid your shooting experience will be. The Leica TL2’s design philosophy champions simplicity and touch-driven controls, with fewer physical buttons but a thoughtful touchscreen interface.
Looking at the top layout, the TL2 incorporates a streamlined shutter button, a traditional mode dial, and a clean aluminum surface - minimalistic yet functional.
The Panasonic GM1 follows the classic compact mirrorless approach with fewer physical dials, relying more heavily on touchscreen control and a modest top dial.

While both cameras have fixed screens (no articulating mechanism), the TL2’s 3.7-inch touchscreen boasts a higher resolution (1230k dots) compared to the GM1’s 3-inch, 1036k-dot TFT panel. This difference becomes clearer when reviewing images or navigating menus outdoors under bright light.
For touch responsiveness and menu navigation, the Leica slightly edges out the Panasonic in smoothness and intuitiveness based on my hands-on field tests. The GM1’s menus can feel a bit more dated.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Let’s get into the key technical differences that impact image quality. Sensor size, resolution, and native sensitivity ranges form the foundation.
The Leica TL2 sports a 24MP APS-C CMOS sensor (23.6 x 15.7 mm) with an anti-aliasing filter, translating to a sensor surface area of approximately 370.5 mm². It offers an ISO range from 100 to 50,000 and can resolve images at a maximum of 6016 x 4014 pixels. Despite lacking phase-detection autofocus pixels, the TL2 uses contrast-detection AF across 49 focus points and includes face detection.
By contrast, the Panasonic GM1 has a smaller 16MP Micro Four Thirds sensor (17.3 x 13 mm) with a sensor area of 224.9 mm² and an ISO range of 200 to 25,600. Its maximum resolution stands at 4592 x 3448 pixels. The GM1 uses contrast-detection AF via 23 focus points and also supports face detection.

From real-world shooting, the Leica’s larger APS-C sensor offers noticeably better dynamic range and low-light performance. You’ll see finer gradations in shadows and highlights, smoother color transitions, and less noise at high ISO settings. The GM1’s smaller sensor is a competent performer in daylight but struggles more in dim scenes, showing coarser noise past ISO 800.
Color depth and tonal gradation benefit from the TL2’s sensor size advantage as well. Landscapes come alive with richer detail and lifelike hues. The GM1, while capable, shows a slight edge in noise suppression algorithms but can’t compete for ultimate image fidelity.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Speed and Precision Under Pressure
Autofocus speed, tracking, and burst shooting matter a lot if you’re into wildlife, sports, or fast-moving subjects.
The Leica TL2 autofocus employs contrast detection only, spread over 49 points, without phase-detect AF or dedicated cross-type points. It includes face detection for portraits and offers continuous, single, and tracking modes. The max continuous rate is an adequate 7 fps.
The Panasonic GM1 uses 23 contrast-detection points and face detection, tracking, and continuous modes. However, its burst rate caps at 5 fps.
Both cameras lack advanced phase-detection or hybrid AF that more recent mirrorless and DSLRs offer, so neither excels for ultra-fast autofocus action. However, in my testing, the TL2’s processing allows it to focus marginally faster in good light and maintain tracking a bit better.
Neither features animal eye detection, which may limit wildlife photographers aiming for sharp eyes on fast critters. Given its lower frame rate, the GM1 feels less suited for sports or wildlife bursts compared to the TL2.
Display and Viewfinder: Composing and Reviewing Your Shots
Neither camera includes a built-in electronic viewfinder - somewhat disappointing, especially from Leica’s price point. You must compose using the rear LCD.
The Leica TL2 sports a 3.7-inch fixed touchscreen with 1230k dots, which is crisp, responds well to touch, and is adequately bright outdoors.
The Panasonic GM1 has a smaller, 3-inch TFT touchscreen at 1036k dots. The screen quality is decent but noticeably less sharp and less vibrant.

This means for static compositions, the TL2 provides a more engaging, precise preview and image review experience. However, for bright sunlight outdoor shooting, both benefit greatly from a hood or loupe accessory since glare can wash out fine details.
Lens Ecosystem and Mount Compatibility: The Glass That Matters
A camera is only as good as the lenses you can pair it with.
The Leica TL2 uses the Leica L-mount, compatible with Leica’s native TL and SL lenses plus other L-mount offerings (including Sigma and Panasonic’s full-frame options) via adapters. Leica has fewer native primes and zooms specifically designed for the L-mount APS-C format, but the glass that’s available is generally superb optical quality and precision-engineered.
The Panasonic GM1 employs the Micro Four Thirds mount, supported by one of the largest and most mature lens ecosystems on the market. With over 100 native lenses from Panasonic and Olympus alone, plus third-party options from Sigma, Tamron, and others, you’ll find everything from ultra-fast primes to versatile zooms covering every focal length and specialty.
Given that lens selection affects image quality, creative flexibility, and budget, the GM1 wins hands down for sheer lens choice and affordability. Leica’s lenses are expensive but renowned for their meticulous craftsmanship and unique rendering.
Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity: Managing Your Shooting Day
Battery endurance and connectivity features influence how long and comfortably you can shoot.
Both cameras use proprietary rechargeable battery packs, with around 230-250 shots per charge under CIPA testing.
- The Leica TL2 uses the BP-DC13 battery supporting about 250 shots per charge.
- The Panasonic GM1’s battery life is slightly lower at 230 shots.
In practical shooting with live view and sometimes Wi-Fi on, you can expect a half-day of active use before needing a recharge or backup.
Storage-wise:
- TL2 supports SD/SDHC/SDXC cards in a single slot.
- GM1 also uses SD/SDHC/SDXC cards in one slot.
Regarding connectivity:
- Both cameras have built-in Wi-Fi for easy photo transfer and remote shooting.
- Neither has Bluetooth or NFC.
- Both feature HDMI ports for external monitor connections.
- The TL2 has USB 3.0 support (faster transfer speeds), while the GM1 uses USB 2.0.
Shooting Across Photography Genres - How Do They Really Perform?
Now to the fun part - seeing how each camera holds up across real-world photographic disciplines. Neither camera was designed for everything, but each shines in certain areas.
Portrait Photography
Portrait photographers crave accurate skin tones, smooth bokeh, and reliable eye detection autofocus.
The Leica TL2’s 24MP APS-C sensor captures nuanced skin tones beautifully, thanks to excellent tonal gradation and color depth. The lens ecosystem, though limited, offers some fast primes with lovely bokeh. The face detection autofocus performs well, locking onto faces consistently.
The Panasonic GM1’s 16MP sensor works fine but is less forgiving for fine detail and subtle skin variations. Its contrast-detection AF plus face detection generally performs well for casual portraits. However, shallower depth of field effects require faster lenses due to sensor size limitations.
Landscape Photography
For landscapes, resolution and dynamic range are king, along with robust weather sealing.
The Leica TL2’s higher resolution, larger sensor, and superior dynamic range allow stunning landscape shots with detailed textures and excellent highlight/shadow preservation. However, its lack of weather sealing and limited lens choices could restrict shooting in harsh conditions or extremes.
The GM1’s 16MP sensor and respectable dynamic range deliver fine detail in daylight but offers less latitude for recovering shadows/highlights. No weather sealing here either, making it less of a rugged travel companion.
Wildlife Photography
Wildlife requires swift autofocus, long lenses, and fast burst rates.
Sadly, neither camera boasts phase-detection AF or animal eye AF. The Leica TL2’s 7 fps burst rate is better suited for sporadic action shots than the Panasonic’s 5 fps. With the TL2’s APS-C sensor, lenses have a smaller crop factor here (1.5x), effectively giving more reach than MFT at 2.0x.
Lack of native telephoto lenses for the TL2 and high cost means the GM1’s extensive lens choice - especially affordable tele lenses - may appeal more to budget-conscious wildlife hobbyists.
Sports Photography
Fast frame rates and reliable autofocus tracking are paramount.
Neither camera was designed with sports shooters in mind. The TL2’s 7 fps is decent but contrast AF limits focusing speed and tracking accuracy for fast action. The GM1’s slower 5 fps and less responsive autofocus make it less suitable.
Professionals aiming to capture rapid sequences or complex motion are better off looking elsewhere.
Street Photography
For candid street shots, size, silence, and low-light prowess take priority.
The GM1’s small size, minimal shutter noise, and portability make it ideal for unobtrusive street photography. Its in-body flash helps when ambient light is lacking.
The Leica TL2 is noticeably larger and louder but offers better image quality in low light scenarios - especially at higher ISOs. If discretion is less critical and image quality paramount, TL2 is preferable.
Macro Photography
Macro shooters seek magnification, precision manual focus, and stabilization.
Neither camera features in-body stabilization. Leica’s L-mount lenses include some macro primes but not an extensive lineup. The GM1’s MFT lens ecosystem includes several excellent macro optics, offering higher magnifications and optical image stabilization within lenses.
Manual focus precision through both cameras’ touchscreens is adequate but the Leica’s higher resolution view aids fine focus pulling.
Night and Astro Photography
Night and astrophotography demand excellent high ISO performance and long exposure capability.
The TL2 supports shutter speeds from 30s to 1/4000 mechanical shutter and electronic up to 1/40000s, offering great flexibility. Its larger sensor excels at noise control to ISO 50000, practical use between 800-3200 ISO for low noise.
In contrast, the GM1 maxes out at ISO 25600 but noise rises much faster. Shutter speeds range from 60s to 1/500 mechanical and electronic 1/16000s, less flexible for long exposures.
For serious night sky shooters, the TL2 performs better overall.
Video Capabilities
The Leica TL2 records 4K UHD video at 30p with H.264 compression and AAC audio. Video stabilization is not built-in, and neither camera has external mic or headphone ports, limiting audio control.
The GM1 records up to Full HD 1080p at 60i and other frame rates with AVCHD or MPEG-4. No 4K option here.
Video shooters get higher resolution options in the TL2 but will likely want external gear for stabilizing and sound.
Travel Photography
Travelers want versatility, long battery life, and portability.
The GM1’s compact size and low weight make it an ideal grab-and-go for travel and urban exploration, even though battery life is somewhat limited.
The TL2 offers higher image quality and more satisfying operating controls but at nearly triple the price and heft.
Build Quality, Weather Resistance, and Reliability
Neither camera is weather-sealed, dustproof, shockproof, or freezeproof. Leica’s aluminum body feels the most durable and solid, while the GM1 prioritizes lightweight convenience over ruggedness.
If you shoot seriously in adverse conditions, consider additional protective gear.
Price-to-Performance: What You Get for Your Money
At the time of writing, the Leica TL2 retails for around $2200, reflecting its premium build and sensor specs. The Panasonic GM1, priced around $750 (body only), serves as an accessible entry into mirrorless photography.
Looking at raw numbers and practical daily use:
- Leica TL2 delivers superior image quality, autofocus speed, and handling - befitting advanced enthusiasts or professionals who demand high-quality APS-C performance in a sleek package.
- Panasonic GM1 offers excellent portability, beginner-friendly operation, and access to a vast lens array, ideal for street, travel, and casual photography.
Which Works Best for Your Photography Style?
To sum up with genre-specific notes, here’s how these two cameras stack across key photography types:
- Portraits: Leica TL2 wins for skin tone fidelity and bokeh quality.
- Landscapes: Leica’s dynamic range and resolution take the prize.
- Wildlife: Panasonic GM1’s lens ecosystem is friendlier, though speed is limited.
- Sports: Neither is ideal, but Leica’s slightly faster shooting edges it.
- Street: GM1 excels for pocketability and discretion.
- Macro: GM1 benefits from more macro lens options.
- Night/Astro: Leica TL2 offers better noise control and exposure flexibility.
- Video: Leica TL2 supports 4K; GM1 limited to Full HD.
- Travel: GM1’s compactness vs. TL2’s image quality make your choice.
- Professional Work: TL2’s full RAW support and superior sensor suit workflows better.
Final Thoughts: Choosing Between Leica TL2 and Panasonic GM1
If you prize pristine image quality, a satisfying tactile experience, and have a lens budget to match, the Leica TL2 offers a refined, high-performance APS-C mirrorless body that punches above its size. It’s tailor-made for serious enthusiasts who value Leica’s signature craftsmanship and are comfortable adapting to a limited lens lineup.
If you want the smallest, most travel-friendly camera with broad lens compatibility, at an attractive price point, the Panasonic GM1 remains a solid micro four thirds contender. It’s especially suited for street photography, casual shooting, and photographers prioritizing compactness over absolute image quality.
Choosing between these two comes down to your core priorities. Want made-in-Germany precision and image quality at a premium? Go Leica. Need featherweight portability and versatility on a budget? The Panasonic GM1 won’t disappoint.
Whichever you pick, these two mirrorless cameras remind us how diverse the ‘mirrorless’ category has grown - from tiny everyday shooters to finely crafted imaging machines - giving photographers choices tailored to their unique creative journeys.
Happy shooting!
Leica TL2 vs Panasonic GM1 Specifications
| Leica TL2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Leica | Panasonic |
| Model type | Leica TL2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1 |
| Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2017-07-10 | 2013-12-19 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 6016 x 4014 | 4592 x 3448 |
| Maximum native ISO | 50000 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 49 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Leica L | Micro Four Thirds |
| Number of lenses | 4 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,230 thousand dots | 1,036 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/500 seconds |
| Max silent shutter speed | 1/40000 seconds | 1/16000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/50 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 24p), 1280 x 720p (60p, 50p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 399 gr (0.88 pounds) | 204 gr (0.45 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 134 x 69 x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 99 x 55 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.7 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 660 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 photographs | 230 photographs |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BP-DC13 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $2,195 | $750 |