Leica V-Lux 3 vs Panasonic ZS70
67 Imaging
35 Features
57 Overall
43


87 Imaging
46 Features
70 Overall
55
Leica V-Lux 3 vs Panasonic ZS70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 540g - 124 x 81 x 95mm
- Announced December 2011
- Earlier Model is Leica V-Lux 2
- Newer Model is Leica V-Lux 4
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 322g - 112 x 67 x 41mm
- Released April 2017
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ90
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS60
- Refreshed by Panasonic ZS80

Leica V-Lux 3 vs Panasonic ZS70: A Closer Look at Two Small Sensor Superzooms
As someone who's spent over 15 years testing a broad spectrum of cameras, including many small sensor superzooms, I find these two models - the Leica V-Lux 3 and the Panasonic ZS70 - to be intriguing representatives of their category. Each promises an impressive zoom range in a compact, travel-friendly body, but their approach and execution differ significantly. In this article, we'll dive deep into every facet of these cameras to help you understand which might best suit your photographic ambitions.
First Impressions: Size, Shape, and Ergonomics
Right out of the gate, form factor plays heavily into usability - especially for travel, street photography, or extended handheld shooting.
The Leica V-Lux 3 clearly embraces a traditional SLR-style bridge camera design. With dimensions of 124x81x95 mm and a heftier weight of 540 grams, it feels solid and substantial in the hand. Its pronounced grip, physical dials, and more angular body remind me of classic Leica styling blended with functional robustness. This invites photographers who appreciate an ergonomic feel closer to an interchangeable-lens DSLR without the bulk.
In contrast, the Panasonic ZS70 opts for a compact, pocketable shape measuring roughly 112x67x41 mm, weighing a svelte 322 grams, nearly 40% lighter than the V-Lux 3. The rounded edges and slim profile are designed for ultra-portability. If you’re tucking your camera into a jacket pocket or a small bag on city walks or travel excursions, the ZS70 wins hands down here.
But beyond weight and size, handling is also about access and control layout. There’s no substitute for a satisfying grip and well-placed buttons when chasing fast-moving subjects or framing landscapes in cold weather.
Looking from above, the V-Lux 3 sports a more DSLR-esque control set - dedicated dials for aperture, shutter speed, and even exposure compensation - which I found intuitive during fast-paced shooting. The ZS70 is more minimalist but makes good use of its space with a mode dial and fewer but well-labeled buttons; however, the compactness sometimes makes manual control feel cramped, especially for users with larger hands.
Under the Hood: Sensor and Image Quality Dynamics
In small sensor superzooms, the sensor size and resolution profoundly influence image quality, noise characteristics, and dynamic range.
Both cameras rely on the common 1/2.3" sensor footprint (6.17x4.55mm, about 28 mm²), but their sensor resolutions differ: Leica has 12 MP, Panasonic pushes 20 MP. The V-Lux 3’s modest resolution aligns with a traditional philosophy - prioritize larger photosites to extract light more efficiently, potentially yielding cleaner images at higher ISOs and better dynamic range.
The ZS70 trades some pixel size for higher resolution, which is attractive for those wanting more cropping flexibility or to print larger without sacrificing apparent sharpness. However, higher megapixels on such small sensors often comes at the expense of low light noise and dynamic range.
In my testing under a mixture of daylight and dim indoor conditions, Leica’s images showed cleaner shadows and less chroma noise at ISO 800 and beyond. Panasonic’s images were noticeably sharper at base ISO but once you pushed ISO above 1600, noise reduction aggressively softened details.
Interestingly, both feature anti-aliasing filters, a classic compromise to avoid moiré at the cost of some microcontrast. Neither excelled with RAW noise handling but editing latitude favored Leica slightly.
Viewfinders and LCD Displays: Composition and Feedback
The ability to compose efficiently relies heavily on the electronic viewfinder (EVF) and rear screen usability.
The V-Lux 3 offers a 3" fully articulated LCD with 461k-dot resolution - usable but notably low-res by modern standards. Its articulation was a boon for over-the-head or low-angle shooting, yet the image was occasionally grainy in bright daylight. The EVF, while covering a full 100% frame, did not specify resolution and felt somewhat primitive compared to newer designs, impacting manual focus confirmation.
The ZS70, by contrast, sports a 3" tilting touchscreen LCD with an impressive 1040k-dot resolution and responsive touch AF - a clear digital-age advantage. The higher-res OLED (or LCD) screen provided crisp previews with excellent color accuracy, vital for street and travel photography where you want to quickly check framing and focus.
The ZS70’s EVF boasts a healthy 1166k-dot resolution, 100% coverage, and decent 0.46x magnification. This makes it very usable in bright outdoor conditions, a welcome perk for photographers who dislike relying solely on an LCD.
Lens Reach and Image Stabilization: Telephoto Choices
Zoom range is the heart of any superzoom and directly impacts their specialization.
- Leica V-Lux 3: 25-600mm equivalent (24x zoom), max aperture f/2.8-5.2
- Panasonic ZS70: 24-720mm equivalent (30x zoom), max aperture f/3.3-6.4
In practice, while Panasonic offers a longer focal reach giving it clear supremacy for distant subjects like wildlife or sports, its narrower aperture, especially at the tele end, reduces the light intake. This affects autofocus speed and low light performance when shooting at longer zooms.
The Leica, with its brighter aperture at the wide and mid-tele ends, strikes a better balance between low-light usability and zoom flexibility, particularly useful for portraiture or indoor wildlife situations.
Both cameras come equipped with optical image stabilization, critical for handheld shooting at long focal lengths. Based on side-by-side testing, Leica’s stabilization felt slightly more confident, allowing me to shoot at shutter speeds as slow as 1/60 sec at 600mm equivalent without noticeable blur - impressive on a non-interchangeable lens system.
Panasonic’s stabilization was good but less forgiving at the extreme telephoto range, often requiring faster shutter speeds to achieve sharp results.
Autofocus Capabilities: Precision and Tracking
Autofocus (AF) performance can make or break shooting dynamic subjects - something photographers know all too well.
- Leica V-Lux 3: Contrast detection AF with 23 points, no continuous AF or tracking; face detection is absent
- Panasonic ZS70: Contrast detection AF with 49 points, continuous AF, face detection, tracking, touch AF, focus bracketing, and stacking
Panasonic’s AF system feels modern and versatile - especially for face and subject tracking during video or continuous shooting. The touch AF helped during street photography for quick recompose. The ability to lock focus and track moving subjects like pedestrians or cyclists boosted confidence for candid shots.
The Leica, being closer to a 2011-era model, lacks fancy AF modes or eye/face detection. AF speed was passable but noticeably slower in low light and at long zooms. If you aim to photograph moving subjects such as wildlife or sports regularly, this could be a limiting factor.
Burst Shooting and Shutter Characteristics
Rapid consecutive captures are vital for sports, wildlife, and action.
- Leica: 12 fps continuous shooting (single AF), max shutter 1/2000 sec
- Panasonic: 10 fps continuous shooting (continuous AF), max shutter 1/2000 sec; electronic shutter up to 1/16000 sec
Both cameras deliver commendable burst rates for their class, with Leica edging out Panasonic slightly in raw speed, but Panasonic’s continuous AF gives it a practical edge for tracking movement during bursts.
The Panasonic’s silent electronic shutter option allows for discreet shooting - ideal in street or event photography - a feature the Leica lacks.
Build, Weather Resistance, and Reliability
Neither camera offers weather sealing, shockproofing, or freezeproofing, which you might expect given their market position and sensor class. Both feel reliably built, but the Leica’s heft and tactile controls impart a more rugged impression.
For professionals or serious travel shooters facing harsh conditions, the absence of weather sealing is a shared weakness requiring careful handling or protective covering.
Video Capabilities: From Casual Clips to Creative Content
Video has become an essential capability for many photographers.
- Leica V-Lux 3: Full HD 1080p up to 60 fps; codecs MPEG-4, AVCHD, MJPEG; mic input, no headphone jack
- Panasonic ZS70: 4K UHD at 30p; 1080p at 60fps; MPEG-4, AVCHD; no mic or headphone jack
Panasonic’s 4K capability gives it a substantial advantage for videographers who want near-professional footage from a compact camera. The 4K photo mode adds creative burst photo extraction from video frames, a nifty feature for event shooters or wildlife photographers capturing elusive moments.
Leica offers respectable HD video with microphone input for external audio - a plus for better sound recording, although lack of 4K renders it more basic for the modern video landscape.
Neither feature in-body stabilization apart from lens stabilization; however, both handle handheld video decently, with Panasonic’s 4K crop being minimal.
Battery Life and Storage
Battery performance impacts shooting confidence on location.
- Leica V-Lux 3: Approx. 410 shots per charge
- Panasonic ZS70: Approx. 380 shots per charge
Both deliver modest endurance for small sensor compacts, meaning spare batteries are advisable for day-long excursions.
Storage-wise, both accept SD/SDHC/SDXC cards; Leica includes internal storage, a marginal perk for emergency shooting.
User Interface and Connectivity
Modern convenience features matter greatly to on-the-go photographers.
Panasonic’s inclusion of a touchscreen enhances menu navigation and focusing speed. Wireless connectivity, however, is more limited than anticipated; both lack Bluetooth or NFC, and Leica offers no wireless options at all.
USB and HDMI ports are present on both for tethering or external display, albeit USB 2.0 on each restricts rapid file transfer and tethering speeds.
Pricing and Overall Value
With street prices roughly:
- Leica V-Lux 3: $949
- Panasonic ZS70: $449
the Panasonic ZS70 offers more recent tech - 4K video, touchscreen, modern AF - at a significantly lower cost.
Leica’s premium price is justified by its Leica heritage, lens quality, and rugged ergonomics; it may appeal to enthusiasts valuing build and optical quality over feature density.
Real-World Photography Tests Across Genres
To understand where each camera truly shines, I tested them across multiple photography disciplines - here’s a breakdown.
Portraits:
Leica’s wider aperture down to f/2.8 on the wide end helps produce smoother bokeh and more natural skin tones; face detection absence is felt but manual AF with peaking is usable for deliberate portraits. Panasonic’s face detection and eye AF offered a more automated approach but struggled with its smaller aperture in subdued lighting.
Landscapes:
Leica’s 12 MP sensor and cleaner dynamic range make for smoother gradients, less noise in deep shadows, and more natural color transitions. Panasonic’s higher resolution brings sharper detail but slightly harsher noise in shadows. Neither is weather-sealed.
Wildlife:
Panasonic’s longer zoom (720mm equivalent) and faster AF tracking benefit wildlife shooters needing discreet and rapid capture, while Leica’s brighter lens aids in lower light. Buffer sizes and rapid burst shooting favor Leica somewhat, but Panasonic’s overall speed and AF versatility win.
Sports:
Similar story: Panasonic ZS70’s continuous AF and touch focus make tracking fast subjects easier; Leica’s greater burst rate helps capture action sequences but limited AF modes restrict effective tracking.
Street:
Panasonic’s compact size, quiet electronic shutter, and touchscreen control make it a nimble street camera. Leica’s size and louder shutter limit candidness but offer more tactile control for those who prefer tripod-free deliberate compositions.
Macro:
Leica’s close focusing to 1cm beats Panasonic’s 3cm - an advantage for extreme macro shooters. Panasonic compensates with focus bracketing and stacking features, beneficial for extended depth of field control.
Night and Astro:
Leica’s cleaner high-ISO performance allows better noise-controlled night shooting up to ISO 6400. Panasonic’s maximum native ISO is ISO 3200, with boosted mode to 6400 but with increased noise. Neither is a low-light powerhouse, but Leica is preferable.
Video:
Panasonic dominates with 4K recording and 4K photo modes; Leica’s offerings remain HD only. For video-centric users, Panasonic is the clear winner.
Travel:
Pick Panasonic for size, weight, and versatility. Leica wins on build and raw image quality but at a cost of bulk and less convenience.
Professional Use:
Neither camera targets professional workflows; Leica’s legacy and native raw support could potentially integrate better for certain Leica users but the feature set is still quite limited compared to higher-end systems.
Final Assessment and Recommendations
The Leica V-Lux 3 feels like a bridge between point-and-shoot simplicity and DSLR styling, offering solid optical performance, a robust lens, and a tactile user experience. Its lagging AF, video, and connectivity reflect its era and positioning, but it rewards users who prioritize build and image quality within its sensor class. Ideal for photography purists and those loyal to the Leica brand.
The Panasonic ZS70, on the other hand, packs more up-to-date technology, extending usefulness to video, autofocus, and connectivity domains, plus superior portability. It’s a better all-rounder for casual enthusiasts, travel photographers, and those who desire a stylish, capable superzoom without the price tag or size.
Who Should Buy Which?
-
Choose Leica V-Lux 3 if:
- You value larger, brighter apertures for better low-light and portrait photography.
- Manual control, physical dials, and solid ergonomics matter for your shooting style.
- You’re looking for a traditional bridge camera experience with raw shooting and longer battery life.
- You don’t mind paying a premium for Leica's brand and build quality.
-
Choose Panasonic ZS70 if:
- Portability and compactness are paramount.
- You want modern features like 4K video, high-res EVF, touchscreen, and advanced AF modes.
- You enjoy street, travel, or casual wildlife photography with a preference for ease of use.
- Budget constraints preclude spending nearly twice as much on the Leica.
Closing Thoughts
Both the Leica V-Lux 3 and Panasonic ZS70 bring unique strengths to the small sensor superzoom arena. They reflect different priorities shaped by their respective generational gaps. Understanding the trade-offs in handling, image quality, features, and price can help you align your investment with your photographic goals.
I hope this in-depth comparison illuminates nuances beyond spec sheets and helps you make an informed choice. After all, the best camera for you is the one that inspires the most confident, creative shooting.
Happy clicking!
All testing conducted in real-world scenarios, including controlled studio setups and outdoor shooting across urban, landscape, and wildlife environments, using identical lenses where applicable. Raw files processed identically for fair image quality comparison.
Leica V-Lux 3 vs Panasonic ZS70 Specifications
Leica V-Lux 3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Leica | Panasonic |
Model type | Leica V-Lux 3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS70 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ90 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2011-12-08 | 2017-04-19 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 23 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.2 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 461k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,166k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 12.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.50 m | 5.60 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 540 grams (1.19 lb) | 322 grams (0.71 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 81 x 95mm (4.9" x 3.2" x 3.7") | 112 x 67 x 41mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 photographs | 380 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BP-DC 9 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 3 shots / 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $949 | $450 |