Olympus 6020 vs Sony A6400
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
83 Imaging
69 Features
88 Overall
76
Olympus 6020 vs Sony A6400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Bump to 102400)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 403g - 120 x 67 x 50mm
- Launched January 2019
Olympus 6020 vs Sony A6400 Overview
The following is a thorough analysis of the Olympus 6020 vs Sony A6400, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and A6400 (24MP) and the 6020 (1/2.3") and A6400 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe 6020 was announced 10 years before the A6400 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Sony A6400 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a simple summary of how the 6020 grades vs the A6400 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony A6400 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Sony Alpha a6400. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Sony A6400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Sony A6400
6020 | A6400 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6400 over the Olympus 6020
A6400 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2019 | February 2010 | Newer by 108 months | |
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Sony A6400
6020 | A6400 |
---|
Olympus 6020 vs Sony A6400 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus 6020 has got physical measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Sony A6400 has proportions of 120mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") having a weight of 403 grams (0.89 lbs).
Check out the Olympus 6020 vs Sony A6400 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the 6020 compared to the A6400.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the 6020 and A6400 is 95 and 83 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony A6400 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading through a spec sheet. The pic below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the 6020 and A6400.
As you can see, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The 6020 using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sony A6400 will resolve more detail with its extra 11MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged 6020 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony A6400 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6020 vs Sony A6400 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Alpha a6400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Alpha a6400 |
Otherwise known as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2019-01-15 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 32000 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Off, auto, on, slow sync, rear sync, redeye reduction, wireless, hi-speed sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, XAVC-S |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 122g (0.27 pounds) | 403g (0.89 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 120 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 83 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick DUO (UHS-I compliant) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $279 | $898 |