Leica V-Lux 30 vs Panasonic S1
90 Imaging
36 Features
46 Overall
40
96 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Leica V-Lux 30 vs Panasonic S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 219g - 105 x 58 x 43mm
- Announced May 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 117g - 99 x 59 x 21mm
- Launched January 2011
Photography Glossary Leica V-Lux 30 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-S1: A Hands-On Comparison for Practical Shooters
As someone who’s spent the better part of two decades testing cameras - poking, prodding, and clicking my way through everything from budget compacts to full-frame beasts - I love digging into how cameras perform in the real world. Today, I’m pairing up two small sensor compacts that often fly under the radar but are worth a second look: the Leica V-Lux 30 and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-S1. Both announced in 2011 with similar sensor sizes yet strikingly different feature sets, these cameras speak to budget-conscious consumers and hobbyists hunting for a sensible pocket camera with a decent zoom range.
Let’s get cracking on a practical, no-nonsense tour of these shooters - laying out their strengths, weaknesses, and, most importantly, which one suits your shootin’ style and wallet.
Size, Feel & Control: Handling That Counts
When you’re wielding a camera day in, day out, how it feels in your hands and how quickly you can access settings defines whether you’re set up to catch the moment or chasing shadows.
Leica V-Lux 30: This camera sits chunky but comfortable in the hand. The grip is substantial for its class, reminding me of a small bridge camera that cradles well for longer shooting. It weighs in at 219g and measures 105x58x43 mm - noticeably beefier than its Panasonic counterpart. Leica’s control layout leans toward simplicity with a fixed lens and limited external dials; still, the buttons are reasonably spaced, and the touchscreen (a rare plus in its era) adds a layer of quick-menu access.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-S1: At just 117g and a streamlined 99x59x21 mm, the Panasonic is a real featherweight. It’s ultra-compact - slick for slipping into a pocket or bag without bulking out. The downside? The thin grip and smaller size can make longer usage less stable, especially with heavier zoom zones. Plus, it lacks a touchscreen, making menu navigation clunkier.
In terms of pure ergonomics and handling, I prefer the Leica V-Lux 30 for any kind of extended shooting - it just “fits” better and feels less like a delicate toy. That said, if you prize portability above everything, Panasonic’s diminutive frame makes a strong case.
Peeking Under the Hood: Sensor and Image Quality Fundamentals
These cameras both sport a 1/2.3-inch sensor (common in compact zoomers), with the Leica packing a 14MP resolution against Panasonic’s 12MP CCD sensor - a notable distinction since Leica uses a CMOS sensor, Panasonic’s CCD technology is a bit more antiquated by 2011 standards.
In practical tests, I found the Leica’s CMOS sensor sharper, with less noise above ISO 800. The Panasonic’s CCD has a slightly warmer color rendition but trails in dynamic range and recovers less highlight/shadow detail - a limitation when capturing tricky lighting like sunsets or high-contrast scenes. The Leica also supports an expanded ISO range (80-6400 native) versus Panasonic’s 100-6400, which gave it slightly better flexibility in dim conditions.
Neither camera offers RAW shooting, limiting post-processing potential - an important consideration if you desire greater creative control. If image quality (sharpness, low noise, dynamic range) comes first in this pairing, the Leica V-Lux 30 takes the prize.
Zoom Lenses & Optical Versatility: Reach & Aperture Tradeoffs
Superzoom lenses define this class, and both cameras stake their claim via long focal lengths with varying apertures:
- Leica V-Lux 30: 24-384mm (16x optical zoom), f/3.3-5.9
- Panasonic Lumix DMC-S1: 28-112mm (4x optical zoom), f/3.1-5.6
That whopping 16x zoom on the Leica offers tremendous reach for birding, sporting events, or wildlife snapshots, delivering a telephoto reach few compacts replicate. Panasonic’s 4x zoom is modest but suffices for general travel and portraiture. Macro capability favors the Leica with focusing as close as 3cm, while Panasonic’s closest focus registers at 5cm.
In low light, wider apertures help, and both lenses start around f/3.1-3.3 for their widest angle, creeping to f/5.6-5.9 at full zoom - a common limitation in superzoom lenses that impacts background blur and low-light sharpness.
If your style hinges on versatility and covering vast distances casually, the Leica’s long zoom gives you far more creative freedom. But if you want a modest zoom with a more pocketable lens, Panasonic’s approach is fair game.
Focus & Shooting Performance: Speed and Accuracy on the Fly
Both cameras employ contrast-detection autofocus systems, typical for small sensor compacts. They each provide 11 focus points, but the Leica pulls ahead with continuous AF and tracking modes, while Panasonic lacks continuous AF altogether.
In my real-world shooting, the Leica V-Lux 30’s AF responded faster and more reliably - shooting action sequences or street portraits was less frustrating. Panasonic’s static focusing slows it significantly for moving subjects or spur-of-the-moment snaps, presenting a challenge for dynamic scenes.
Continuous burst shooting is supported at 10fps on the Leica, allowing you to grab fast sequences with ease. Panasonic lacks a specified continuous shooting rate, effectively ruling it out for sports or wildlife enthusiasts looking to chase fast moments.
In short, if autofocus speed, tracking, and burst shooting matter to you, especially for wildlife, sports, or children on the move, the Leica V-Lux 30 pulls ahead without question.
Screen and Interface: Navigating Your Settings
The Leica offers a 3-inch touchscreen LCD with modest 460k-dot resolution. Navigating menus, tapping focus points, or reviewing images on it felt natural and responsive. The touchscreen was a noticeable boon for quick adjustments without fumbling through buttons.
The Panasonic sports a smaller, non-touch 2.7-inch TFT LCD at only 230k dots, offering a dimmer and less clear display for live view and playback. With no touchscreen, all interaction depends on buttons. The small size and reduced resolution made composition and reviewing shots trickier, especially outdoors or in bright light.
User interface on the Leica is simpler but more intuitive, thanks mostly to touchscreen functionality and better button placement. If you prefer poking and swiping, Leica’s interface wins. Panasonic feels slightly dated and less fluid for modern shooters.
Video Capabilities: What’s Your Moving Picture Style?
Both cameras support video recording but with different approaches and resolutions:
- Leica V-Lux 30: Full HD (1920x1080) at 60fps, records in AVCHD and MPEG-4 formats
- Panasonic Lumix DMC-S1: HD (1280x720) at 30fps, records in Motion JPEG format
In practice, the Leica delivers noticeably smoother, sharper video thanks to Full HD and higher frame rate options. AVCHD compression also creates better quality footage at smaller file sizes than Panasonic’s Motion JPEG. Neither camera offers microphone or headphone jacks, and neither supports 4K or advanced video features.
If video performance is a key factor, especially for casual HD video or family events, the Leica’s superior resolution and frame rate make it the clear choice.
Battery and Storage: Power to Keep Shooting
Battery life is similar for both, with the Leica rated at around 260 shots per charge, and the Panasonic just slightly less at 240 shots. Both rely on proprietary rechargeable battery packs. Real-world usage often felt limited to a day of moderate shooting, meaning you’ll want a spare battery if you plan all-day outings or travel.
Storage-wise, both cameras accept common SD/SDHC/SDXC cards plus internal memory, which is typical. USB 2.0 connectivity is standard on each but with no wireless options - no Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC. This limits instant image transfer or remote shooting, a bummer for social media shooters or scouting professionals needing quick backups.
Build Quality & Weather Resistance: Ready for the Rough Stuff?
Neither camera offers any weather sealing, dustproofing, shockproofing, or freeze resistance. Both are designed as typical consumer compacts rather than rugged outdoor tools. The Leica does feel sturdier thanks to a chunkier design, but in terms of pushing into harsh environments, neither model is recommended.
Price and Value: Where Does Your Money Go?
Coming to price, the Leica V-Lux 30 carries a hefty MSRP of around $900 (new), reflecting Leica’s premium branding and zoom offering. Although aging, it still trades at higher prices on the used market due to that cachet and zoom versatility.
The Panasonic Lumix DMC-S1 entered life around $270 new - a budget find for travel compact aficionados. It lacks advanced features but hits a sweet spot for cheapskate shooters wanting basic image-making in a tiny package.
From value alone, Panasonic appeals to strict budget buyers, but when weighing overall performance, image quality, and versatility, the Leica commands a justified premium - making it the better "bang for your buck" if you can stretch the funds.
How Do They Perform Across Photography Styles?
Let’s examine these cameras for the most popular photography types you might have in mind:
Portrait Photography
- Leica V-Lux 30 edges ahead with better resolution, slightly wider zoom start for subtle headshots, and the touchscreen aids in quick focus adjustments. Skin tones render more naturally, but without RAW, heavy editing isn't possible.
- Panasonic feels underwhelming here due to lower resolution, poorer focus control, and screen limitations.
Landscape Photography
- Dynamic range and sensor size are modest for both, but Leica’s CMOS chip pulls more detail out of shadows and highlights - critical for scenery. Plus, longer zoom covers distant peaks or wildlife.
- Lack of weather sealing hurts outdoor hardcore use for both; pack extra care for exposure to elements.
Wildlife and Sports
- Leica’s 16x zoom, 10fps burst, and continuous AF trump Panasonic’s slower AF, limited zoom, and no burst, making Leica the only reasonable choice for action or wildlife.
- Panasonic struggles with fast subjects and reach, best suited for casual static wildlife shots.
Street Photography
- Panasonic’s slim, light design is stealthier and less eye-catching - perfect for discreet street shooting. Leica is bulkier, potentially drawing unwanted attention but compensates with better autofocus for unpredictable urban scenarios.
- Low-light autofocus also favors Leica.
Macro Photography
- Leica’s closer focusing distance and higher resolution facilitate tighter, more detailed close-ups. Panasonic’s minimum focus distance and sensor limit macro appeal.
Night / Astro Photography
- Neither excels here due to small sensor sizes and lack of manual long-exposure modes.
- Leica edges out with slightly lower noise at higher ISOs, but astrophotography enthusiasts would outgrow both quickly.
Video
- Leica handles HD video more capably with smooth 60fps. Panasonic suffices for basic 720p casual clips but won’t please serious videographers.
Travel
- Panasonic’s compact, lightweight form factor maximizes portability and discreet shooting potential - great for urban and cultural travel.
- Leica’s zoom versatility makes it ideal for diverse travel situations - urban, wildlife, landscapes - if size and budget permit.
Professional Use
- Neither camera fits into a pro workflow due to limited RAW support, slow speed, and modest image quality. Leica is slightly better in reliability and build but generally both are consumer-level.
What’s in the Gallery? See Both in Action
Here, you can observe sample shots highlighting color rendition, zoom reach, and clarity differences. The Leica samples show cleaner details and more faithful colors, while Panasonic’s are softer with slightly muted tones. Focus lag is evident in the Panasonic wildlife shots, whereas Leica nails sharpness consistently.
Top-Down Design and Control Layout
The top view highlights Leica’s classier, functional control scheme including dedicated zoom lever and mode dial, contrasting Panasonic’s minimalist approach with fewer physical controls. This points again to the Leica being geared for more engaged shooters who want tactile buttons over menus.
Final Pros and Cons at a Glance
Leica V-Lux 30
- Superior zoom range (16x) with flexible focal lengths
- Faster, continuous autofocus including tracking modes
- Higher resolution, better image quality with CMOS sensor
- 3" touchscreen LCD aids usability
- Full HD video at 60fps
- Better battery life and handling
- Larger and heavier
- Premium price point
- No RAW or advanced video inputs
- No weather sealing
Panasonic Lumix DMC-S1
- Ultra-compact and lightweight, highly portable
- Budget-friendly price
- Decent color rendition for casual shots
- Limited zoom (4x) & slower AF
- Lower resolution CCD sensor, softer images
- No touchscreen, clumsy menu navigation
- Limited video resolution (720p)
- No continuous shooting or tracking AF
Who Should Buy Which? A Practical Recommendation
If you want a compact, cheapskate-friendly camera for effortless casual photography, travel snaps, and street shooting where stealth is key, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-S1 is your ticket. Its petite size and low weight make it excellent for everyday pocket carry and light travel, but temper expectations on speed, zoom reach, and image quality. Ideal if you want something fuss-free and inexpensive.
On the other hand, if you crave a more versatile superzoom compact with better autofocus, wider zoom coverage, superior image and video quality, the Leica V-Lux 30 is worth the higher investment. It handles action, wildlife, landscapes, and video far better and offers greater creative potential due to faster autofocus and higher frame rates. It’s a solid choice for hobbyists seeking a compact zoom with better-than-average performance at a premium price.
Wrapping Up: My Takeaway from Testing
Having live-tested both cameras extensively, I must commend Leica for packing quite a bit of punch into the V-Lux 30 with its comprehensive zoom reach, solid autofocus, and video upgrade over Panasonic. It’s a compact superzoom that punches above its weight but at a noticeable price premium. The Panasonic Lumix DMC-S1 feels more like a simple point and shoot - great for beginners or budget travelers but quickly outpaced when speed, versatility, and image quality count.
If I were buying for myself today and had to choose, the Leica V-Lux 30 would edge out as my practical all-rounder for walks, wildlife, and family gatherings, while the Panasonic might slot into my secondary pocket for quick city snaps due to its paltry size.
In the end, your choice depends on your priorities: bulk and versatility vs. absolute portability and budget. Hopefully, my hands-on insights and this thorough comparison help you pick the camera that fits your photography habits - and your wallet - with no unpleasant surprises.
Happy shooting!
This detailed analysis is grounded in my extensive experience testing hundreds of cameras under varied conditions and practical workflows. I encourage you to consider what features you prioritize most before pulling the trigger.
Leica V-Lux 30 vs Panasonic S1 Specifications
| Leica V-Lux 30 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-S1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Leica | Panasonic |
| Model | Leica V-Lux 30 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-S1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2011-05-26 | 2011-01-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Venus Engine FHD | Venus Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-384mm (16.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 219 gr (0.48 pounds) | 117 gr (0.26 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 58 x 43mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.7") | 99 x 59 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 images | 240 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $900 | $269 |