Clicky

Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB350F

Portability
88
Imaging
46
Features
58
Overall
50
Nikon Coolpix A900 front
 
Samsung WB350F front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42

Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs

Nikon A900
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
  • 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
  • Announced February 2016
  • Later Model is Nikon A1000
Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Released January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB350F Overview

Below, we are matching up the Nikon A900 versus Samsung WB350F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Nikon and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and WB350F (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The A900 was unveiled 2 years after the WB350F which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the A900 grades vs the WB350F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Samsung WB350F

 A900 WB350F 
ReleasedFebruary 2016January 2014More modern by 26 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution921k460kCrisper display (+461k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Nikon A900

 WB350F A900 
Manual focus Very precise focus
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Nikon A900 and Samsung WB350F

 A900 WB350F 
Display dimension3"3"Identical display sizing
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison

When you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and volume. The Nikon A900 comes with physical measurements of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has sizing of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).

See the Nikon A900 versus Samsung WB350F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the A900 against the WB350F.

Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A900 and WB350F is 88 and 90 respectively.

Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison

Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes only by seeing a spec sheet. The pic underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the A900 and WB350F.

As you can see, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Nikon A900 to show extra detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more recent A900 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison

Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Nikon A900 Portrait photography details
Samsung WB350F Portrait photography details
40
MP count decent (20MP)
supports face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
40
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Nikon A900 Street photography info
Samsung WB350F Street photography info
69
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (289 grams)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
61
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (276 grams)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Nikon A900 Sports photography advice
Samsung WB350F Sports photography advice
56
excellent zoom range (24-840mm 35.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
50
excellent zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Nikon A900 Travel photography info
Samsung WB350F Travel photography info
74
lighter than average in class (289 grams)
has bluetooth
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
long reach (840mm)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.4)
69
lighter than competition (276 grams)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (23mm)
great reach (483mm)
lack of Timelapse function
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Nikon A900 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB350F as a Landscape photography camera
49
rather wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
50
focusing manually
pretty wide (23mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
lack of Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon A900 Vlogging details
Samsung WB350F Vlogging details
34
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection autofocus
great video quality (3840 x 2160 pxls)
lighter than average in class (289g)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
missing external mic jack
34
pretty wide (23mm)
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Optical)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (276g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
lack of external microphone support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon A900 and Samsung WB350F
 Nikon Coolpix A900Samsung WB350F
General Information
Manufacturer Nikon Samsung
Model type Nikon Coolpix A900 Samsung WB350F
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2016-02-23 2014-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Full resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-840mm (35.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.4-6.9 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 921 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 seconds 16 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 7.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) 1920 x 1080
Max video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 289g (0.64 pounds) 276g (0.61 pounds)
Dimensions 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 pictures -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery ID EN-EL12 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $400 $260