Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB350F
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Announced February 2016
- Later Model is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Released January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Below, we are matching up the Nikon A900 versus Samsung WB350F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Nikon and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and WB350F (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe A900 was unveiled 2 years after the WB350F which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the A900 grades vs the WB350F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix A900 & Samsung WB350F. The full galleries are available at Nikon A900 Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Samsung WB350F
| A900 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 |  | January 2014 | More modern by 26 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Nikon A900
| WB350F | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Samsung WB350F
| A900 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and volume. The Nikon A900 comes with physical measurements of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has sizing of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
See the Nikon A900 versus Samsung WB350F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the A900 against the WB350F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A900 and WB350F is 88 and 90 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes only by seeing a spec sheet. The pic underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the A900 and WB350F.
As you can see, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Nikon A900 to show extra detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more recent A900 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A900 | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Samsung WB350F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2016-02-23 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 921 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 289g (0.64 pounds) | 276g (0.61 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $400 | $260 |