Nikon L110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
77 Imaging
35 Features
28 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95655/95655cd9fd1beef9ec6ed6b1e417b696d0e697b4" alt="Nikon Coolpix L110 front Nikon Coolpix L110 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Nikon L110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 406g - 109 x 74 x 78mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Previous Model is Nikon L100
- Updated by Nikon L120
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Nikon L110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Nikon L110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the L110 (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively close but the L110 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The L110 was launched 3 years earlier than the XZ-2 iHS and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summary of how the L110 scores vs the XZ-2 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Nikon L110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix L110 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Nikon L110 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon L110 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
L110 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Nikon L110
XZ-2 iHS | L110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | December 2012 | ![]() | February 2010 | More recent by 34 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Nikon L110 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
L110 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Nikon L110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Nikon L110 offers physical dimensions of 109mm x 74mm x 78mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.1") having a weight of 406 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check the Nikon L110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the L110 compared to the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e07a7/e07a7ee4bf5673267072ca08238ef3445625c637" alt="Nikon L110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Nikon L110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the L110 and XZ-2 iHS is 77 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58cb1/58cb1cd5f3a7d682bcabb2092a50627f59120642" alt="Nikon L110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Nikon L110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Nikon L110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to see the difference in sensor measurements purely by viewing specs. The visual here should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the L110 and XZ-2 iHS.
All in all, both the cameras provide the same megapixels albeit not the same sensor measurements. The L110 features the smaller sensor which is going to make obtaining bokeh tougher. The older L110 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/968f7/968f7839f22ccf392059ded76cc6f3df93bc55c0" alt="Nikon L110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Nikon L110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Nikon L110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19710/1971089b42dade4dffd041187e155ccefc910cde" alt="Nikon L110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon L110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Nikon L110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Nikon Coolpix L110 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix L110 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-02-03 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Expeed C2 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-420mm (15.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 13.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 406g (0.90 pounds) | 346g (0.76 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 74 x 78mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.1") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (3 sec or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $280 | $450 |