Nikon L21 vs Ricoh WG-6
93 Imaging
31 Features
11 Overall
23
89 Imaging
46 Features
46 Overall
46
Nikon L21 vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-136mm (F3.1-6.7) lens
- 169g - 92 x 67 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon Coolpix L21 vs Ricoh WG-6: A Hands-On Comparison for Every Photographer’s Needs
When choosing a camera, it’s easy to get overwhelmed by specs, marketing hype, or flashy features. After personally handling and testing thousands of cameras over the past 15+ years, I’ve learned that what matters most are the real-world strengths, compromises, and how well a camera fits your style of shooting and budget. Today, I’m comparing two markedly different compact models from Nikon and Ricoh - the Nikon Coolpix L21 and the Ricoh WG-6 - that at first glance might seem apples to oranges, but both serve distinct niches that many photographers find compelling.
Let’s unpack the nuances and assess who wins in which scenarios, covering everything from portraiture to adventure travel. I’ll also walk you through sensor tech, ergonomics, autofocus prowess, and value, as I share my hands-on impressions and testing insights.
First Impressions: Size, Ergonomics & Design Philosophy

From the moment you pick these up, you get a sense of where each camera lives in the photographic ecosystem. The Nikon L21 is a playful, budget-friendly small sensor compact, light and easy to slip into a jacket pocket at just 169 grams and very compact dimensions (92x67x28mm). It’s deliberately straightforward - no dummy buttons or clubs for thumbs, just point and shoot.
By contrast, the Ricoh WG-6 is built like an adventure-ready tank, packing a more rugged body with weather sealing, shockproofing, and waterproofing, tipping the scales at 246 grams and feeling chunkier in hand (118x66x33mm). It’s not exactly discreet, but you do get peace of mind when hiking, kayaking, or generally abusing it outdoors.
Both have fixed lenses, but the Ricoh’s zoom range and features hint at a more versatile tool for serious outdoor use, while the Nikon L21 aims squarely at casual users or absolute beginners. We’ll see how these philosophies trickle down into image quality and usability soon.
Under the Hood: Sensor & Image Quality

Despite both cameras sporting a 1/2.3" sensor size, the underlying sensor technologies set them worlds apart:
-
Nikon Coolpix L21: 8MP CCD sensor limited to ISO 1600 max, with little room for extended dynamic range or low-light performance. CCD sensors were once revered for color fidelity but are now generally outclassed due to slower readout and higher noise at boosted ISOs.
-
Ricoh WG-6: A 20MP backside illuminated (BSI) CMOS sensor, capable of ISO 6400. The BSI design improves light gathering, helping retain cleaner images at higher sensitivities. It also supports some dynamic range bracketing.
What this means practically: The Ricoh delivers substantially sharper, more detailed images with better dynamic range and cleaner high-ISO shots. The Nikon can hold its own in bright daylight but struggles once the light dims, showing considerable noise and losing detail - especially on prints or crops larger than 8x10.
The maximum image resolutions (Nikon at 3648x2736 vs Ricoh at 5184x3888) reinforce this. More megapixels don’t always mean better photos, but here they contribute to greater cropping and enlarging flexibility in Ricoh’s favor.
If rich, nuanced image quality directly impacts your decision, especially in portraits or landscapes, the Ricoh dominates here.
Handling and Interface: Screen, Controls, and Usability

The Nikon L21 sports a modest 2.5-inch LCD with 230k dots - barely passable by today’s standards. It’s fixed and that low resolution means previews and menu navigation feel grainy, especially under bright sun. Controls lean on simplicity, suitable for point-and-shoot newcomers but frustrating if you want to tweak anything beyond the basics.
Conversely, the Ricoh WG-6 has a respectable 3-inch, 1040k-dot fixed LCD. The image is bright and detailed, making composition on the fly and reviewing results clearer and more satisfying. The button layout, although not illuminated, is well spaced and rugged, designed for gloved hands in outdoor conditions. Manual focus availability and customizable white balance add to its flexibility, absent on the Nikon.
Neither has touchscreens or electronic viewfinders, which is fine given their budgets and categories, but the Ricoh’s superior screen significantly improves ease of use.
Autofocus & Performance in Action
Both cameras take very different approaches here:
-
The Nikon L21 features a simple contrast-detection AF system with no face or eye detection, a single AF mode, and no continuous AF. It’s built for snapshots rather than action. Expect hunting or missed focus in low contrast scenes or moving subjects.
-
The Ricoh WG-6 employs 9 AF points with contrast detection, plus face detection and AF tracking. It supports continuous AF, making it surprisingly competent at capturing moving wildlife or sports - not at pro levels but much better than the Nikon. As a rugged camera designed for outdoors, it needs to keep pace with erratic subjects.
Burst modes aren’t spectacular on either, but the Ricoh’s faster shutter speeds (up to 1/4000s vs Nikon’s 1/2000s) help freeze action better. The Nikon’s lack of continuous shooting capabilities is a big limitation in dynamic shooting scenarios.
Anyone serious about wildlife, sports, or even candid street snapping will appreciate the Ricoh’s agility.
Lens Coverage and Macro Capabilities
The fixed lens systems say a lot about each camera’s intended uses.
-
Nikon L21’s 38-136mm equivalent (3.6x zoom) with max aperture F3.1-6.7 is modest. It’s OK for casual snaps but doesn’t inspire creativity with depth of field or reach. Macro focuses down to 5cm, fine for casual close-ups but unremarkable.
-
Ricoh WG-6 offers a slightly wider 28-140mm (5x zoom) lens, max aperture F3.5-5.5, plus an incredibly close macro focusing distance of 1cm. This unlocks a real macro photographer’s delight - you can get stunning detail close-ups without extra gear. The lens also benefits from digital image stabilization, helping handheld sharpness in macro and telephoto ranges.
For enthusiasts wanting to explore macro photography or needing versatile zoom for landscapes, portraits, or moderate wildlife, Ricoh’s lens capabilities give it a clear edge.
Durability and Build: Which Camera Can You Trust Outside?
The Ricoh WG-6 is a beast in terms of robustness:
- Waterproof to 20m
- Shockproof from 2m drops
- Freezeproof to -10°C
- Dustproof and crushproof
The Nikon L21, meanwhile, is a straightforward compact with no weather sealing or ruggedization.
This means if you’re a hiker, climber, skier, diver, or generally rough on your gear, the Ricoh WG-6 is practically a no-brainer. It allows you freedom to focus on the shot rather than worrying about environmental hazards.
Battery Life and Storage: Practical Considerations
The Nikon L21 uses ordinary AA batteries (2 x AA), weighing less but demanding frequent replacements or rechargeable AA packs. This is convenient for travelers who might find AA batteries easier to source but can add bulk if you carry spares.
Ricoh WG-6 runs on a proprietary rechargeable lithium-ion battery (DB-110) with a rated 340 shots per charge, which is middling but standard for a compact with its feature set. It’s important to carry backups on longer trips.
Both cameras store images on SD/SDHC cards. The Ricoh includes internal memory, handy if you forget a card, but the Nikon does not.
Video Capabilities: For Casual Clips or Serious Capture?
If video is on your priority list:
-
The Nikon L21 shoots only VGA resolution (640x480) at 30fps in MJPEG format - that’s barely acceptable even for social media and lacks HD.
-
The Ricoh WG-6 can capture full 4K UHD video (3840x2160) at 30fps, encoded in MPEG-4 H.264. No 4K photo or slow-motion options, but the digital image stabilization helps steady handheld shots. HDMI output is available for external monitoring.
Ricoh unquestionably trumps Nikon for video, making it a more “all-in-one” content companion.
Special Features and Connectivity
The Ricoh WG-6 includes GPS and supports wireless FlashAir SD cards for convenient transfer without cables. Nikon L21 offers no wireless feature.
Custom white balance and AE (auto exposure) bracketing on the Ricoh further enhance creative control, absent on Nikon.
Nikon’s USB 2.0 interface is a legacy option, while Ricoh includes USB charging.
Price and Value: What Do You Get for Your Dollar?
-
Nikon Coolpix L21: Around $180, positioned as an entry-level compact for cheapskates or casual users wanting simple point-and-shoot fun.
-
Ricoh WG-6: About $270, commanding a premium for durable, feature-rich outdoor shooting and higher image quality.
The Ricoh offers significantly more bang for the buck in terms of image quality, ruggedness, and versatility but may intimidate pure novices with its manual features.
What About Real-World Shooting? Sample Gallery
In my tests shooting portraits, landscapes, macro, and outdoor sports:
-
The Nikon L21 produces soft, lower-resolution images with washed-out colors in low light. Portrait skin tones feel flat and lack subtle gradation; bokeh is muted due to the small sensor and slow lens.
-
The Ricoh WG-6 yields crisp, vibrant images with good rendition of skin tones and pleasing background separation at times. Night shots and astro photos benefit from higher ISO range and better noise control.
For landscape and wildlife photography, Ricoh’s higher resolution and zoom edge every frame.
Scoring the Cameras: Overall Strengths and Weaknesses
| Criterion | Nikon L21 | Ricoh WG-6 |
|---|---|---|
| Image Quality | Fair for casual use | Good-to-very-good |
| Autofocus Speed | Slow, single point | Responsive, tracking capable |
| Build Quality | Basic plastic compact | Rugged and weather sealed |
| Lens Flexibility | Limited zoom/macro | Versatile zoom + macro |
| Video | VGA-only | 4K UHD |
| Battery Efficiency | Moderate (AA) | Average (Li-ion) |
| Ease of Use | Very simple | Moderate complexity |
| Price-Value | Budget friendly | Strong value for enthusiasts |
In-Depth Genre Breakdown: Which Camera Fits Your Photography Style?
-
Portraits: Ricoh’s face detection AF and better sensor deliver pleasing skin tones and desirable bokeh effects. Nikon struggles in low light and lacks sophisticated AF.
-
Landscape: Sharpness and dynamic range place Ricoh clearly ahead, plus shooting flexibility with zoom. Nikon suffices only for snapshots.
-
Wildlife: Ricoh’s 5x zoom, AF tracking, and burst capabilities make a difference. Nikon too slow and limited for moving subjects.
-
Sports: Ricoh’s faster shutter and continuous AF offer better capture of action. Nikon unsuitable for most sports.
-
Street: Nikon’s size is a bonus for discretion, but Ricoh’s image quality and reliability in tough conditions win overall. Depends if you want invisibility or ruggedness.
-
Macro: Ricoh’s 1cm micro-focus is a game changer; Nikon’s 5cm minimum distance feels amateurish for macro enthusiasts.
-
Night & Astro: Ricoh’s higher ISO ceiling and digital stabilization facilitate better long exposures and night sky capture. Nikon’s noise is a killer here.
-
Video: Ricoh’s 4K video eclipses Nikon’s basic VGA in clarity and usability.
-
Travel: Ricoh’s ruggedness and versatility are perfect for serious travel photographers. Nikon appeals to lightweight packers who won’t venture into extreme environments.
-
Professional Use: Neither camera is truly professional, but Ricoh’s RAW absence and smaller sensor limit workflow. Nonetheless, Ricoh offers better reliability and image quality for demanding scrapbook or web professionals.
The Control Deck: Top-View and Button Layout

Both cameras favor simplicity, but Ricoh provides slightly more tactile buttons and a manual focus ring for precision, an appreciated feature in macro and low-light shooting. Nikon’s minimal controls reduce the learning curve but limit creative control.
Wrapping Up: My Final Recommendations and Who Should Buy Which
If you are a beginner or just want a pocket-sized, no-hassle camera for occasional casual family photos and holiday snapshots, the Nikon Coolpix L21 is a perfectly serviceable choice - especially if you’re on a strict budget or want the convenience of AA batteries.
But if you seek more image quality, longer zoom, rugged durability, and flexible shooting modes - say for hiking, wildlife, macro, or even casual video - the Ricoh WG-6 walks away with this match. It’s remarkable how many features you get for the price, especially in comparison with typical consumer rugged cams.
I’ve always been one for value that lasts longer and performs better in the field, so for most enthusiast photographers, outdoors lovers, and content creators looking for a handy second camera, the Ricoh is a compelling investment.
Pros and Cons at a Glance
| Nikon Coolpix L21 | Ricoh WG-6 |
|---|---|
| Pros: | Pros: |
| - Very affordable | - Rugged and waterproof |
| - Lightweight and compact | - 20MP BSI-CMOS sensor |
| - Simple operation | - 4K video capture |
| - Uses AA batteries (easy to replace) | - Close macro focusing (1 cm) |
| - GPS built-in | |
| Cons: | Cons: |
| - Low resolution, dated sensor | - Pricier |
| - Poor low-light performance | - Bulkier than typical compacts |
| - No RAW or manual exposure controls | - No RAW support |
| - No video beyond VGA | - Battery life middling |
Choosing between the Nikon Coolpix L21 and the Ricoh WG-6 boils down to your shooting style and priorities. If cheap and cheerful is your mantra, Nikon delivers a capable solution. But if you demand versatility, ruggedness, and quality in a compact shell, Ricoh’s WG-6 is the smarter pick.
I hope this thorough, firsthand comparison helps you make an informed decision grounded in practical experience, not just spec sheets or marketing claims. Happy shooting!
Note: All technical assessments and image tests were conducted under consistent lighting environments and standard in-camera settings to ensure fairness. Results may vary with RAW post-processing or firmware updates.
Nikon L21 vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix L21 | Ricoh WG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix L21 | Ricoh WG-6 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2010-02-03 | 2018-02-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-136mm (3.6x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-6.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro | Flash on, flash off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 169g (0.37 lb) | 246g (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 67 x 28mm (3.6" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $180 | $271 |