Nikon Coolpix L31 vs Samsung TL210: A Detailed Ultracompact Camera Shootout for Enthusiasts and Pros

In a market flooded with digital cameras, the battle between ultracompact models is as fierce as ever - particularly when the brands carry the reputations Nikon and Samsung bring to the table. Today, I’m diving deep into two specifically: the Nikon Coolpix L31 (released in early 2015) and the Samsung TL210 (circa 2010) - both ultracompacts aimed at casual users but with some distinct features that might sway enthusiasts or even professionals looking for a simple backup.

On the surface, these cameras seem like distant cousins - a Nikon with a 16MP CMOS sensor and a Samsung sporting a 12MP CCD chip, both fixed-lens designs with modest zooms and limited manual control. But as someone who’s tested cameras from pocket-friendly shooters to full-frame workhorses over the past decade and a half, I know that the devil’s often in those subtle details.

Let’s unpack what these cameras really offer in practical terms - not just specs hunted from press releases, but how these specs translate to your photography fun and results. We’ll look across all major photography genres: portrait, landscape, wildlife, and more, and I’ll pepper in comparisons of ergonomics, build, and value.

How They Feel in Your Hands: The First Impression Matters

Before pressing the shutter, how a camera feels can make or break the shooting experience. Both cameras embrace the ultracompact form factor, designed for ease of carry and casual use without being a burden.

The Nikon L31 measures 96 x 59 x 29 mm and weighs approximately 160 grams, powered by two AA batteries. The Samsung TL210 is slightly larger and heavier, at 99 x 59 x 20 mm and 177 grams, using a dedicated SLB-07B rechargeable battery.

Feel-wise, the Nikon’s slightly chunkier profile gives it a bit more grip security than the Samsung's slimmer design, which feels more like an ultra-sleek candy bar. The L31's AA batteries make it convenient for travel - AA batteries are ubiquitous worldwide, so you’re unlikely to be left in the lurch without a charged cell. However, that also means extra weight compared to Samsung’s internal rechargeable battery system.

The Samsung’s thinner body is arguably more pocket-friendly, but with a tradeoff in grip comfort - especially if you have larger hands or need steady handheld shots in low light (more on that later). Both cameras are undeniably designed for casual snapshots rather than hardcore, gripped shooting sessions.

Top Controls and Usability: Quick Access or Menu Diving?

Performance isn't just about specs - it's about how intuitively you can operate the camera. Let’s peek at the control layout.

The Nikon L31 has a very minimal top control setup - power, shutter, a zoom toggle, and a mode dial mostly geared toward fully automatic convenience. There’s no manual exposure control or even aperture/shutter priority options. Everything depends on the camera’s automated metering and processing.

Samsung TL210, while also lacking manual exposure modes, adds some clever customizations: self-timer options include double shots and motion detection self-timings - useful for fun candid shots. Its zoom rocker and dedicated mode buttons are slightly more tactile and responsive compared to the Nikon’s, aiding quick operation on-the-fly.

Neither camera boasts an electronic viewfinder, relying solely on their rear LCDs for composition.

Behind the Glass: Sensor Tech and Image Quality

When it comes to image quality, the sensor is king. Both these cameras stick with a 1/2.3-inch sensor size - a standard for ultracompact models, but a size that inherently limits dynamic range and noise performance compared to larger sensors.

Let’s get technical for a moment:

• Nikon L31 uses a 16-megapixel CMOS sensor (6.17 x 4.55 mm sensor area), with an image resolution max of 4608 x 3456 pixels. Its max ISO sits at 1600, with a min ISO of 80.

• Samsung TL210 sports a 12-megapixel CCD sensor (6.08 x 4.56 mm sensor area), shooting at a max of 4000 x 3000 pixels. Its max ISO pushes to 3200.

From testing these sensor types extensively, I can confirm CMOS sensors generally handle noise and dynamic range better than CCDs, especially in 2015-era tech. Nikon’s sensor should, therefore, offer cleaner images at higher ISOs and better shadow recovery capabilities - advantage Nikon here.

However, Samsung’s slightly higher max ISO might appeal in theoretically darker scenarios, but expect grain and color distortions creeping earlier due to CCD limitations.

Both cameras apply an anti-aliasing filter, which helps reduce moiré but can slightly soften microcontrast, vital for landscape detail.

Screen and Interface Usability: The Window to Your Frame

With no viewfinder, the rear screen is your composition and confirmation tool.

Samsung’s 3.5-inch LCD enjoys a slight edge over the Nikon L31’s 2.7-inch screen - not just in size but its readability and touchscreen response (Samsung’s screen is touch-enabled). This makes framing and navigating menus easier on the TL210, especially in bright conditions.

Nikon’s fixed screen is smaller, non-touch, with only 230k-dot resolution - not exactly eye candy, but serviceable for casual use.

If you like tapping through settings or previewing images on a bigger screen, Samsung’s user interface feels more modern and responsive, despite the camera’s age.

Portrait Photography: Skin Tones, Eye Detection, and Lovely Bokeh?

Now, can these ultracompacts handle people shooting with flair?

The Nikon L31 includes face detection autofocus, which helps keep faces sharp - an absolute boon in casual portrait settings. Unfortunately, it lacks eye detection, so the autofocus is less exact on eyes - a feature now standard in higher-end models but rare in this category.

Samsung TL210 lacks face or eye detection but offers multiple autofocus areas (center-weighted, multi-area) with contrast detection AF. In practice, this results in hunting focus in low contrast scenes or tricky lighting.

Neither camera features a bright fast lens - Nikon’s aperture ranges from f/3.2 to f/6.5 across the zoom, Samsung’s from f/3.5 to f/5.9 - meaning low light portraits or creamy background separation won’t be stellar.

The built-in lenses max out at a 5x zoom around 26-27 mm wide to roughly 130-135 mm equivalent telephoto - just enough for headshots at the tele end but limited aperture means shallow depth of field effects and bokeh are minimal.

In short, these are snapshot-level portrait tools - fine for family albums but not the dreamy portraiture pros demand.

Landscape Photography: Resolving Detail and Dynamic Range Challenges

Landscape photography puts sensors, lenses, and dynamic range to the test.

Both cameras allow shooting with aspect ratios of 4:3 and 16:9, with the Nikon packing a higher 16MP resolution enabling more print-friendly large images versus Samsung’s 12MP.

While neither camera has weather sealing or advanced stabilization to protect in rough outdoor conditions, the Nikon does digital stabilization, and the Samsung boasts optical IS - which typically does a better job compensating for hand shake.

The modest max aperture and telephoto zoom ranges limit “creative” landscape framing options. Still, the wider 26-27 mm equivalent offers a decent angle for general landscapes.

Dynamic range is where the Nikon’s CMOS sensor excels slightly. When shooting sunsets or high-contrast scenes, Nikon’s sensor retains more highlight and shadow detail, reducing the dreaded “blown out sky” effect.

Samsung’s CCD sensor, venerable as it may be, falls short here, making images sometimes look flatter with less tonal gradation.

Wildlife Photography: Speed and Reach Under the Microscope

If you're chasing birds or critters, autofocus speed, burst rates, and telephoto zoom matter - none of which these cameras truly shine at.

Neither camera offers continuous or burst shooting modes, with Nikon lacking any burst specs entirely, and Samsung not providing that feature either. Autofocus is contrast-based and single-point-focused for both, with no tracking or animal eye-detection.

The max telephoto zoom around 130-135 mm equivalent (~26-27 mm wide) is somewhat limiting for distant subjects, though decent for casual daytime shots with proximity.

In essence, wildlife enthusiasts are better served by cameras with faster AF systems and longer lenses, but these models can still serve as casual nature shooters for quick snaps.

Sports Photography: Tracking Fast Action with Pocket Cameras?

Sports demand rapid autofocus, high continuous frame rates, and good low-light sensitivity.

Neither camera supports continuous shooting, shutter priority, or manual exposure; this alone makes them unfit for capturing fast-moving sports action where precise framing and exposure control are critical.

Autofocus systems are slow contrast detection with limited focus points, unsuitable for tracking moving subjects.

Low-light performance is also underwhelming - Nikon’s max ISO is 1600 and Samsung’s 3200, but with noisy output in dim conditions, limiting utility in stadiums or evening games.

If sports photography excites you, these cameras are more for casual sidelines snaps than purposeful action photography.

Street Photography: Blending Discretion, Speed, and Portability

Street photography often calls for discreet gear, quick autofocus, and good low light response.

Here, both cameras have virtues:

• Ultra-compact, easy to slip into pockets without drawing attention, especially the Samsung’s thinner silhouette.

• Both use silent shutter sounds by default, minimizing distractions.

• Nikon’s face detection aids candid portraits.

• Samsung’s touch interface and custom self-timer modes (including motion shutter) foster experimental, creative shots.

That said, slower autofocus and lack of manual controls hinder spontaneous exposure adjustment in tricky city lighting.

Still, for casual urban explorers or weekend city strollers, these cameras can serve well, especially the Samsung for its larger screen aiding framing.

Macro Photography: Getting Close and Personal

Macro enthusiasts need a close focusing distance and precise AF control.

Samsung TL210 has a notably shorter macro focus range of 5 cm versus Nikon’s 10 cm - meaning you can get closer to your tiny subject (think flowers, insects).

Both cameras rely on contrast-detection AF, which can be finicky at very close distances, sometimes hunting around instead of locking focus instantly.

Neither supports focus bracketing or stacking, so advanced macro imaging is out.

Image stabilization helps prevent shake at close range; Samsung’s optical IS likely outperforms Nikon’s digital IS here.

Bottom line: For casual close-up snaps - Samsung edges out slightly due to macro proximity and optical stabilization.

Night and Astro Photography: ISO Sensitivity and Exposure Control

Night photography exposes camera weakness quickly - large sensors and manual control are prized here.

Neither camera supports manual exposure modes, long shutter options beyond 4 seconds (Nikon) or 8 seconds (Samsung), nor bulb mode necessary for astro shots.

ISO limits (Nikon 1600, Samsung 3200) are modest, but noise rapidly degrades image quality beyond ISO 400-800.

The Nikon does allow custom white balance, which aids in artificial lighting situations over Samsung’s lack thereof.

Neither camera is an astro-photographer’s tool - better left for casual night shots of friends or cityscapes.

Video Features: Recording Quality and Usability

Video specs are quite basic on both:

• Both max out at 720p HD (1280x720 pixels).

• Nikon L31 records Motion JPEG; Samsung TL210 also uses Motion JPEG but adds VGA and QVGA frame rates.

• Neither has microphone or headphone inputs.

• Samsung supports HDMI output; Nikon does not.

Neither offers image stabilization tailored specifically for video, nor do they have advanced video autofocus like continuous AF.

The takeaway? Video quality is for simple home movies or quick vlogs with moderate quality, not for professional filmmaking.

Travel Photography: Battery, Weight, and Versatility

Travelers prize portability, battery life, and flexibility.

Nikon’s use of AA batteries is a mixed bag - while offering global replaceability, it often yields only modest battery life (rated about 200 shots).

Samsung relies on a proprietary rechargeable battery, potentially more efficient but with risk if the battery dies far away from a charger.

Weight difference is minimal, but Nikon’s compactness and slightly lighter weight (160g vs 177g) potentially help for extended carrying.

Lens-wise, both offer about 5x zooms which are versatile enough for diverse travel scenes.

Given small size, ease of use, and decent image quality for travel snapshots, both serve well as a secondary or casual travel camera.

Pro Work and Reliability: Integration and Workflow

Neither camera can be considered a professional tool outright.

No RAW support (both record only JPEG), no advanced manual controls, nor high-speed capture pipelines limit their inclusion in professional workflows.

No weather sealing, no external flash support, and no Wi-Fi or Bluetooth connectivity reduce adaptability.

However, for quick “grab and go” corporate or event backup shots, these cameras provide reliability through simplicity and an easy user interface.

Build and Weather Resistance: Handling Life’s Elements

Neither the Nikon L31 nor Samsung TL210 offers environmental sealing, waterproofing, or shock protection.

Use carefully in inclement weather or rough terrain.

Build quality is decent but predominantly lightweight plastic components - adequate for gentle casual use, but don't expect ruggedness.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: Fixed Means Fixed

Both cameras have fixed lenses, so no option to change optics.

This fixed 5x zoom (~26-27 to 130-135 mm equivalent) covers most casual shooting needs.

For enthusiasts desiring lenses to match specific genres, neither camera delivers on this front.

Connectivity and Wireless Features: Sharing in the Modern Age

Neither camera supports Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS.

File transfers occur over USB 2.0.

Samsung does offer HDMI output for video playback, which the Nikon lacks.

Lacking wireless features is less surprising given their market era and class, but a notable gap for modern sharing-centric photographers.

Putting Performance Scores in Context

Summarizing objective and subjective performance:

From my hands-on experience, these scores accurately reflect their capabilities - neither breaks new ground but each holds value in their niche.

Delving further, genre-specific performance ratings clarify strengths:

Sample Image Gallery: See for Yourself

Words are one thing, but images demonstrate true capabilities.

The Nikon delivers cleaner images with slightly better sharpness and color accuracy in daylight.

Samsung’s output tends to warmer hues and softer details.

Both suffer in low light but handle daylight snapshots adequately.

Final Verdict: Which Outfits Your Pocket and Shooting Style?

Pick Nikon Coolpix L31 if...

• You want higher megapixels and a modern CMOS sensor offering better low-light capability.

• Convenience of AA batteries sounds like a plus.

• You prioritize face detection for casual portraits.

• Prefer a slightly chunkier grip and straightforward shooting.

• A budget-conscious, simple snapshot tool is your goal.

Pick Samsung TL210 if...

• You value a larger, touch-enabled screen for framing and navigation.

• Macro photography (closer focusing distance) entices you.

• HDMI output for sharing videos on TVs is desired.

• You like a sleeker, slimmer camera that tucks neatly into your pocket.

• You appreciate expanded self-timer modes and a wider range of flash settings.

Caveats for Both

Neither camera suits high-end photography pursuits - wildlife, sports, professional workflows - or video beyond casual use.

Manual control lovers will be frustrated; these cameras mainly appeal to savvy hobbyists seeking simple, grab-and-go shooting with decent image quality.

If you’re eyeing ultracompacts but need something more powerful, you might explore Sony’s RX100 series or Canon’s G-series, which pack larger sensors and manual controls albeit at higher prices and sizes.

In conclusion, the Nikon L31 and Samsung TL210 occupy an intersection of simplicity, portability, and modest capability. They faithfully capture memories, just without the bells and whistles for demanding creators. If that fits your photography philosophy, either could be a cheerful companion.

Happy shooting - and may your next image be your best yet!