Nikon P300 vs Sony WX70
92 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
97 Imaging
38 Features
46 Overall
41
Nikon P300 vs Sony WX70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 189g - 103 x 58 x 32mm
- Released May 2011
- Later Model is Nikon P310
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
- 114g - 92 x 52 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon Coolpix P300 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70: A Definitive Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals
In the realm of small sensor compacts, the Nikon Coolpix P300 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70 present intriguing propositions, albeit catering to somewhat different priorities despite their shared category. This in-depth technical comparison explores both models across a comprehensive spectrum of performance attributes, operational ergonomics, and photographic disciplines, to inform discerning photographers and imaging professionals about their practical and technical differentiators.
Both cameras were released in the early 2010s, representing relatively mature compact designs that prioritize portability while retaining respectable image quality and feature sets for their class. The examination draws upon direct hands-on testing of each model, focusing on critical parameters such as sensor performance, autofocus capabilities, ergonomics, and real-world shooting results.
Physical Dimensions and Handling: Ergonomics Matter in Compact Cameras
User interface and handling profoundly impact the photographic experience, especially in compact cameras designed for spontaneous shooting scenarios.
- Nikon P300: Measuring 103mm × 58mm × 32mm and weighing 189g, it is noticeably larger and heavier.
- Sony WX70: Smaller and lighter at 92mm × 52mm × 19mm and 114g.

The Nikon’s larger form factor translates into a more substantial grip area and physical controls conducive to extended shooting sessions without excessive hand fatigue. This is critical when manual exposure settings and priority modes come into play. Its mechanical button layout and the inclusion of aperture/shutter priority modes provide photographers with more direct manipulation. The Sony WX70, being slimmer and lighter, appeals to shooters prioritizing absolute portability. However, this comes at the expense of tactile feedback and limited physical controls, relying on menu navigation and touchscreen interaction.
Both cameras feature fixed rear LCDs measuring 3 inches diagonally with 922k-dot resolution, offering sufficiently sharp previews.
Design and Control Interface: Balancing Accessibility and Speed
The design approach influences operational speed and reduces cognitive load during fast-paced shooting.

The Nikon P300’s top plate presents dedicated dials and buttons for exposure modes and manual controls - advantageous for photographers accustomed to DSLR-style operations. In contrast, the Sony WX70 opts for a minimalist approach with fewer physical buttons. Instead, it incorporates a touchscreen enabling more direct access to settings, albeit with some latency and less precision in rapidly changing environments.
Neither camera includes an optical or electronic viewfinder, mandating reliance on the rear screen for composition - a significant consideration for bright daylight conditions and those preferring eye-level framing.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Core of Performance
Both models utilize 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS sensors, standard for the compact segment. Despite identical sensor sizes, differences in resolution and processing architectures impact output quality.

- Nikon P300: 12MP resolution, Expeed C2 image processor.
- Sony WX70: 16MP resolution, BIONZ processor.
Resolution vs. Usable Detail
Although the WX70 offers nominally higher megapixels, practical resolution depends on sensor design and noise control. In hands-on testing, the P300 delivers marginally better low-light performance due to its slightly wider maximum aperture at the wide end (f/1.8 vs. f/2.6). However, the higher resolution on the WX70 enables more cropping flexibility and finer detail in bright conditions.
Dynamic Range & Color Fidelity
Neither camera has published DxO Mark metrics. Subjectively, the Nikon’s color reproduction is more natural with skin tones showing subtle warmth - a benefit for portrait shooters. The Sony leans marginally cooler but more neutral. Both sensors employ anti-aliasing filters, slightly limiting ultimate sharpness.
Noise and High ISO Handling
Maximum native ISO differs markedly: P300 tops at ISO 3200, WX70 extends to ISO 12800. But testing reveals noticeable noise increase on WX70 above ISO 800, limiting practical use in low light. The P300’s noise profiles remain more controlled up to ISO 1600, aided by its faster aperture.
Display and User Interface Experience
While both cameras utilize 3-inch screens with identical resolution, the screen technology and interactive features diverge in practical terms.

Nikon P300: TFT-LCD with anti-reflection coating, fixed, non-touch. Bright, sharp with reasonable outdoor visibility but no touch input. All adjustments require buttons/dials, which may slow down novices but ensures deliberate control.
Sony WX70: Sony’s XtraFine TFT and capacitive touchscreen enable faster menu navigation and focus control, including touch autofocus. However, screen visibility in harsh sunlight is limited compared to Nikon’s anti-reflective coating.
Autofocus Systems and Focusing Performance
Autofocus speed and accuracy are crucial for capturing sharp images in dynamic scenes.
- Nikon P300: Nine contrast-detection AF points; face detection enabled; no phase detection or manual focus.
- Sony WX70: Unknown number of AF points but supports center and multi-area contrast detection with touch AF; face detection present.
Contrast-detection AF is inherently slower than phase detection, but the Nikon’s optimized algorithm and dedicated processing yield relatively fast lock times, especially in good light, with improved tracking on moving subjects. The Sony’s touch AF adds usability benefits but shows a slight lag under low contrast or dim lighting.
Neither camera provides continuous AF during video. Neither supports manual focus, limiting precision for macro or selective focus work.
Lens Characteristics: Reach and Aperture Trade-Offs
Built-in zoom lenses define framing versatility and image capture quality.
- Nikon P300: 24-100mm equivalent, 4.2× zoom, bright f/1.8-4.9 aperture.
- Sony WX70: 25-125mm equivalent, 5× zoom, smaller aperture f/2.6-6.3.
The Nikon’s wider maximum aperture at the 24mm end excels in low-light and shallow depth-of-field scenarios, beneficial in portraiture or night photography. The Sony extends reach to 125mm, providing greater telephoto utility, albeit with narrower apertures limiting dim light usage and increasing susceptibility to motion blur without flash.
Macro focusing capabilities differ slightly: Nikon’s closer minimum focus distance at 3cm vs Sony’s 5cm enables more intimate close-ups with finer detail capture.
Burst Shooting and Shutter Performance
Shooting action sequences relies on frame rates and shutter responsiveness.
- Nikon P300: 7 fps (frames per second) continuous shooting.
- Sony WX70: Up to 10 fps continuous shooting.
While the Sony WX70 theoretically offers higher maximum burst rates, actual buffer depth and focus acquisition during bursts limit prolonged shooting in rapid action scenarios. The Nikon balances slightly slower frame rates with more reliable focus tracking during burst mode.
Shutter speed ranges favor the Nikon with a maximum speed of 1/2000 sec compared to Sony’s 1/1600 sec, allowing better control over freezing fast motion or wide aperture use in bright light.
Flash and Low-Light Capabilities
Integrated flashes provide supplementary light, albeit limited by power and range.
- Nikon P300: Flash range 6.5 meters, modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye.
- Sony WX70: Flash range 5.3 meters, modes Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync.
Nikon’s broader flash range improves fill illumination and indoor effectiveness. Slow Sync on the Sony aids in balanced exposure for ambient and flash combination but lacks Red-Eye reduction, requiring in-software corrections.
Low-light shooting favors the Nikon due to its wider aperture lens and cleaner high ISO performance.
Battery Life and Storage Formats
Both cameras use proprietary battery packs with comparable battery life ratings:
- Nikon P300: Uses EN-EL12 battery, rated for approximately 240 shots per charge.
- Sony WX70: NP-BN battery, also about 240 shots per charge.
Neither camera offers an external battery grip or dual-slot storage redundancy. Storage compatibility differs: Nikon supports SD/SDHC/SDXC cards exclusively, whereas the Sony WX70 accepts memory cards and also Memory Stick variants, affording greater flexibility in media choices.
Video Capabilities: Recording Flexibility and Quality
Video functionality is a significant consideration in compact cameras, often transcending still photography alone.
- Nikon P300: Full HD 1920x1080 at 15 and 30 fps, HD 720p up to 60 fps, formats H.264 and Motion JPEG.
- Sony WX70: Full HD 1920x1080 at 60 fps, plus 1440x1080 and HD 720p, supporting MPEG-4 and AVCHD.
Sony’s video frame rate advantage and AVCHD compatibility offer smoother and higher quality recording for action and slow motion. Both cameras lack microphone and headphone ports, limiting audio quality customization. Neither features video stabilization outside lens-based optical IS.
Durability and Environmental Resilience
Neither camera offers weather sealing, waterproofing, dustproofing, or ruggedized build features. Consequently, both are unsuited for challenging weather or extreme professional conditions without protective housings.
Sample Images and Practical Shooting Insights
Real-world shooting comparisons highlight nuanced performance differences across genres.
- Portraiture: Nikon’s faster lens aperture and more natural color reproduction deliver more flattering skin tone rendition and subtle background blur. Touch AF on Sony aids accurate face focusing but its narrower apertures limit depth-of-field control.
- Landscape: The Sony’s higher resolution supports increased detail capture, though dynamic range and HDR performance remain comparable. Neither camera’s sensor excels in recovering highlights or shadows in extreme contrast.
- Wildlife and Sports: Limited by fixed lens zooms and contrast-detection AF systems; both struggle tracking fast moving subjects. Sony’s slightly faster burst rate is offset by slower AF acquisition.
- Macro and Close-Up: Nikon’s 3cm close focusing excels for flower and product shots, with usable optical stabilization enhancing sharpness at close distances.
- Night and Astro: Nikon’s wider aperture and cleaner ISO result in superior usability for night scenes, though neither camera is optimized for long exposures required for astrophotography.
- Street and Travel: Sony’s smaller size and lighter weight favor inconspicuous carry and quick shooting; however, Nikon’s ergonomic advantages shine in deliberate, manual mode use.
Performance Ratings and Overall Scores
Comprehensive performance assessments considering image quality, speed, ergonomics, and versatility yield the following overview.
While neither camera is exemplary across all metrics, the P300 generally scores higher for image quality and user control, whereas the WX70 excels in portability and burst speed.
Genre-Specific Performance Breakdown
Different photographic disciplines demand tailored capabilities; here is an evaluation of both cameras across key genres:
| Photography Genre | Nikon P300 | Sony WX70 | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Superior skin tones, better bokeh | Good AF, less aperture control | Nikon’s lens speed favors subject isolation |
| Landscape | Balanced dynamic range | Higher resolution | Sony yields more crop options; Nikon offers warmer color |
| Wildlife | Slower AF, limited zoom | Faster burst, longer zoom | Neither ideal; Sony better reach but poorer AF accuracy |
| Sports | Moderate burst and AF | Higher burst rate | Sony leads in fps; Nikon’s AF more reliable |
| Street | Larger, less discreet | Compact, portable | Sony preferred for stealth; Nikon better control |
| Macro | Closer focusing distance | Limited macro focus | Nikon preferred for detailed close-ups |
| Night/Astro | Better ISO performance | Higher ISO ceiling (noisy) | Nikon better noise control for usable night shots |
| Video | 1080p 30fps, H.264 | 1080p 60fps, AVCHD | Sony superior video fluidity and compression options |
| Travel | More versatile, heavier | Lightweight, limited control | Sony for ease; Nikon for shooting flexibility |
| Professional Work | Manual modes support | No manual exposure | Nikon more suited for controlled shooting workflows |
Final Recommendation: Which Camera Suits Your Needs?
-
Choose Nikon Coolpix P300 if:
- You require better manual control (A/ S / M modes) and finer exposure adjustments.
- Image quality, especially in low light and portrait conditions, is a priority.
- You want a faster lens aperture for selective focus and shallow depth-of-field effects.
- Ergonomics and tactile control are more important than compactness.
- Video is secondary; stills are your main interest.
-
Choose Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70 if:
- Extreme portability and lighter weight are paramount.
- Higher resolution JPEG output and 1080p video at 60fps are key requirements.
- You prefer touchscreen control and faster burst shooting for casual action shots.
- Budget constraints favor a substantially lower price point.
- You accept more limited manual control in exchange for convenience.
Closing Technical Insights Based on Testing Methodologies
Extensive side-by-side testing in controlled studio environments and real-world outdoor settings reveals nuanced trade-offs characteristic of small sensor compacts. The Nikon P300’s well-calibrated exposure and emphasis on lens speed provide superior image quality foundations, especially in controlled and portrait contexts. Conversely, the Sony WX70’s design ethos embraces usability and mobility, delivering faster frame rates and touchscreen responsiveness, though at a cost to image quality consistency and manual control.
Photographers evaluating these models should prioritize their usage scenarios and consider the importance of manual exposure options, sensor resolution, and lens aperture relative to their primary shooting styles.
This comparison empowers informed decisions grounded in hands-on metrics and operational realities, beyond marketing narratives, aligning with professional-grade camera evaluation standards.
This article combined practical bedside testing with technical sensor and system analysis to present a balanced and in-depth view for photographers seeking to understand the Nikon Coolpix P300 versus Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70 compact cameras.
Nikon P300 vs Sony WX70 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Sony |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix P300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-05-31 | 2012-01-30 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Expeed C2 | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 160 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-100mm (4.2x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/2.6-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT-LCD with anti-reflection coating | XtraFine TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.50 m | 5.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (15, 30fps), 1280 x 720p (15, 30, 60 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 189 grams (0.42 pounds) | 114 grams (0.25 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 58 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 92 x 52 x 19mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | 240 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $500 | $242 |